green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Stefanoni v. Darien Little League, Inc.
See Perlmutter v. Johnson, 6 Conn. App. 292, 295 , 505 A.2d 13 (‘‘the trial court admirably demonstrated its impartiality in permitting [the defendant], as a pro se litigant, a broad latitude in trying his case’’), cert. denied, 200 Conn. 801 , 509 A.2d 517 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1035 , 107 S. Ct. 886 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Butterworth Scheck v. Cristwood Contr., No. Cv94 031 88 18 (Jun. 18, 1999)
See also Perlmutter v. Johnson , 6 Conn. App. 292 , 298 , 505 A.2d 13 , cert. denied, 200 Conn. 801 , 509 A.2d 517 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1035 , 107 S.Ct. 886 93 L.Ed.2d 839 (1987) (plaintiff attorney obtained subject funds on defendant client's behalf as a result of an action which he undertook as defendant's attorney, and therefore was entitled to a lien on those funds).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gdowik v. United States (In Re Gdowik)
See, e.g., Biermann v. Commissioner, 769 F.2d 707 (11th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1035 , 107 S.Ct. 887 , 93 L.Ed.2d 840 (1987); Stoecklin v. C.I.R., 865 F.2d 1221 (11th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Trammell
(2×)
See, also, United States v. Hicks, 798 F.2d 446 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 1035 , 107 S. Ct. 886 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Feflie
(2×)
Compare United States v. Henry, 447 U.S. 264 , 100 S.Ct. 2183 , 65 L.Ed.2d 115 (1980) (deliberate elicitation found where the State intentionally creates a situation likely to induce defendant to make incriminating statements), with, Maine v. Moulton, 474 U.S. 159 , 106 S.Ct. 477 , 88 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985) (Sixth Amendment not violated when, by luck or happenstance the State obtains incriminating statements), United States v. Hicks, 798 F.2d 446 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1035 , 107 S.Ct. 886 , 93 L.Ed.2d 839 (1987) (despite fact that informant worked as a government informant in th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juan Andres Cardenas
See, e.g., United States v. Hicks, 798 F.2d 446, 451-52 (11th Cir.1986) (court found that government did not have exceptionally strong case on intent where key government witness could be impeached on basis of criminal history), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1035 , 107 S.Ct. 886 , 93 L.Ed.2d 839 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Westmac, Inc.
v.
Smith
v.
Smith
No. 86-795.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1987.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.