green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
18.5 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"Badgley II "
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Landy v. Irizarry
ometimes authority to arrest a suspect is based on facts known only to his superiors or associates.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. David Lee Pace
the trial court does not abuse its discretion as long as the jury receives sufficient information to appraise the biases and motivations of the witness.
cited
Cited "see"
People of Michigan v. Arshad Hamza Aljamailawi
See United States v Atisha, 804 F2d 920 (CA 6, 1986), cert den 479 US 1067 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Cervantes
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 550 (9th Cir. 1986) (“We uphold a district court’s findings of fact at a suppression hearing unless they are clearly erroneous.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Cervantes
(3×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 550 (9th Cir. 1986) (“We uphold a district court’s find- ings of fact at a suppression hearing unless they are clearly erroneous.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Cervantes
(3×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 550 (9th Cir.1986) (“We uphold a district court’s findings of fact at a suppression hearing unless they are clearly erroneous.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Colon
See United States v. Valez, 796 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 957 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1987) ("The rule that permits courts to assess probable cause to arrest by looking at the collective knowledge of the police force - instead of simply looking at the knowledge of the arresting officer .... exists because, in light of the complexity of modern police work, the arresting officer cannot always be aware of every aspect of an investigation; sometimes his authority to arrest a suspect is based on facts known only to his superiors or associates.”). 39 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Lee Hardwell, United States of America v. Marcel A. Hardwell, United States of America v. Dennis L. Hardwell, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Frederick D. Bowens, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Adam Stallings, AKA Gene Walker, United States of America v. Dennis L. Hardwell Marcel A. Hardwell, Frederick D. Bowens Adam Stallings, AKA Gene Walker
(2×)
See United States v. Vreeken, 803 F.2d 1085, 1092-93 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hardwell
(2×)
See United States v. Vreeken, 803 F.2d 1085, 1092-93 (10th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanley Sims and Sam Sims, Jr.
See United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 927 (6th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Saccoccio
See, ___ e.g., United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 927 (6th Cir. ____ _____________ ______ 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987). _____ ______ The apparent strength of the argument is that the taped evidence showed these two appellants being told to assemble amounts over $10,000 and the "over $10,000" instruction appears to dovetail with this evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael S. Menzer
(2×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 549 (9th *1228 Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Wickham
(2×)
See United States v Atisha, 804 F2d 920 (CA 6, 1986), cert den 479 US 1067 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Musella
(2×)
See Badgley v. Santacroce, 800 F.2d 33, 37-38 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987) (judgment of federal court must be respected even if compliance violates state law). *603 As Magistrate Judge Grubin observed, Mr. DeAngelis could raise the required funds by selling or renting the Florida condominium, by selling or using income from DeAngelis Jewelers, or by renting out the second-family apartment that is currently being occupied rent-free by his gainfully employed 22-year-old grandson.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Day
(2×)
See United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 924 (6th Cir.1986) (“government is obligated to adhere” to “open file” agreements made with a defendant, and a “defendant is justified in relying upon” such agreements), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987); see also United States v. Millet, 559 F.2d 253, 256-58 (5th Cir.1977) (Government’s non-compliance “with any and all agreements and promises it makes with and to defendants” constitutes a “serious breach of the Government’s duty, as well as a possible violation of a defendant’s constitutional…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eva R. Amundsen, United States of America v. Leon G. Hill, United States of America v. Wayne G. Hill, United States of America v. Hyrum J. Amundsen, Jr.
See United States v. Vreeken, 803 F.2d 1085, 1091 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987). 26 Moreover, Hill has failed to demonstrate a logical nexus between his subjective understanding of the law and Hoffman's own opinions; Hill never claims to have sought or become aware of Hoffman's opinions during the period in question.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Lee Taylor
(3×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 554 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joan Anna Yuk Lin Van Schoiack Frederick Neal Stribling Cecil Cleve Van Schoiack Larry Cecil Van Schoiack Allene Van Schoiack Appellants-Appellants
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 556 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald S. Brown
(2×)
In Lovasco , Justice Marshall, writing for the Court, recognized that, while statutes of limitations provide the primary guarantee against the prosecution of overly stale criminal charges, id. at 789 , 97 S.Ct. at 2048 ; accord United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 928 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987), the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment also plays a “limited role” in protecting against excessive preindictment delay, Lovasco, 431 U.S. at 789 , 97 S.Ct. at 2048 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Joseph Valeri
See United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 926 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987); United States v. Terry, 729 F.2d 1063, 1067 (6th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tucker v. City of Charleston, W.Va.
See Badgley v. Santacroce, 800 F.2d 33, 38 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987); Kirkland v. New York Dep't of Correctional Servs., 711 F.2d 1117 , 1132 n. 18 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 (1984); Hoots v. Pennsylvania, 672 F.2d 1124, 113132 (3d Cir.1982); Carter v. Gallagher, 452 F.2d 315, 328 (8th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 950 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Richard Tripp and Richard Alfred Fonseca
See United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 927 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987). 60 Defendant Fonseca argues that the inference from the remark was that defendants are armed robbers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nited States of America v. Richard Bruce Vorpagel
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987). 7 AFFIRMED. * The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and 9th Cir.R. 34-4 ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy L. Green (No. 90-5249) and Mary A. Gillespie (No. 90-5250)
See United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 928 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987) (faulty memory of key government witness may satisfy the prejudice prong). 35 The defendants argue that actual prejudice should be presumed in this case "since the inescapable conclusion is that the government delayed intentionally to gain a tactical advantage." Appellant Green's Brief at 22.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roman Magana-Olvera
(2×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 549 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur P. Tranakos, United States of America v. William Pilgrim
(2×)
See United States v. Vreeken, 803 F.2d 1085 , 1091 & n. 2 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald Levy (89-5980) and Calvin Black (89-6099)
(2×)
See United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 925-26 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Malcolm Davis
(2×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 550 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987). *251 Davis contends that the Coast Guard illegally stopped, boarded, and searched the Myth.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ben Collins v. John Nagle
Accord United States v. Valez, 796 F.2d 24, 28 (2nd Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 957 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1987); United States v. Hawkins, 595 F.2d 751 , 752 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 2005 , 60 L.Ed.2d 380 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ned Begay
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 555 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 (1987); United States v. Hernandez-Miranda, 601 F.2d 1104, 1107 (9th Cir.1979). 9 Begay also challenges the following instruction. 10 There is evidence in this case tending to show that the defendant may have been intoxicated prior to and at the time of the alleged commission of the offense with which he is charged.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Lois Tillman v. Edward Coley, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Bleckley County, Ga.
(2×)
See United States v. Valez, 796 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 957 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1987) (information casting doubt on identity relevant to the determination of reasonableness).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Samantha D. Lopez Ronald J. McIntosh
(4×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 554 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kerry Lynn Brown
(2×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 556-57 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987) (evidence of substantial debt admitted to show motive for bank robbery); Bowman, 720 F.2d 1103, 1104-05 (evidence of prior conviction admitted to show motive of revenge); Bradshaw, 690 F.2d 704, 708-09 (evidence of prior sexual acts between victim and defendant admitted to show motive for kidnapping).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kerry Lynn Brown
(2×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 556-57 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987) (evidence of substantial debt admitted to show motive for bank robbery); Bowman, 720 F.2d 1103, 1104-05 (evidence of prior conviction admitted to show motive of revenge); Bradshaw, 690 F.2d 704, 708-09 (evidence of prior sexual acts between victim and defendant admitted to show motive for kidnapping).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rollins
(2×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544 (9th Cir.1966), cert. denied 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Palmigiano v. DiPrete
(2×)
See Badgley v. Santacroce, 800 F.2d 33, 36 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987) (holding correction officials in contempt for exceeding population cap established by consent decree when political difficulties and possible conflict with state courts were only reasons cited as making compliance impossible).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Richard Comerford
(2×)
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 557 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas, Dated January 5, 1988. Richard Roe, Abc Corporation and Def L.P. v. United States
See United States v. Rylander, 460 U.S. 752, 757 , 103 S.Ct. 1548, 1552-53 , 75 L.Ed.2d 521 (1983); United States v. Barth, 745 F.2d 184, 187 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); see generally Badgley v. Santacroce, 800 F.2d 33, 36-37 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brad Dong Lee, James Young Lee
This court recently stated that “[w]hen reviewing a claim of error relating to jury instructions, this court views the instructions in the context of the overall charge.” United States v. Alcantar, 832 F.2d 1175, 1178 (9th Cir.1987); see United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 555 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987); United States v. Burgess, 791 F.2d 676, 680 (9th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Lewis, Jr.
See United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 557 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Badgley v. Santacroce
(2×)
See New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey, 706 F.2d 956, 970 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 464 U.S. 915 , 104 S.Ct. 277 , 78 L.Ed.2d 257 (1983). (“As experience with this type of litigation increases, a concensus is emerging among commentators in favor of modification with a freer hand.”) See also Badgley v. Santacroce, 800 F.2d 33 , 38 n. 3 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987) (noting that Supreme Court recently held consent judgments enable federal court to adopt broader remedial measures).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Ex Parte Fierro
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987); Parker v. State, 594 S.W.2d 419, 424 (Tex.Crim.App.1980), cert. granted and judgment vacated on other grounds, 453 U.S. 902 , 101 S.Ct. 3134 , 69 L.Ed.2d 988 (1981); Green v. State, 587 S.W.2d 167, 170 (Tex.Crim.App.1979), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 3146 , 69 L.Ed.2d 996 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sarno
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 557 (9th Cir.1986) (bank robbery), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987); United States v. Saniti, 604 F.2d 603, 604 (9th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 461 , 62 L.Ed.2d 384 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9376, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,355 United States of America v. Anthony C. Sarno and Charles W. Knapp, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Joseph v. Nash
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 557 (9th Cir.1986) (bank robbery), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987); United States v. Saniti, 604 F.2d 603, 604 (9th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 461 , 62 L.Ed.2d 384 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Antonio DUQUE, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
If the indictment is dismissed at the government’s behest, on the other hand, and thereafter a charge is filed against the defendant for the same offense, or any offense required to be joined with that offense, any period of delay from the date the charge was dismissed to the date the time limitation would commence to run as to the subsequent charge had there been no previous charge [is tolled]. 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(1); see also United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 548 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hurley
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 927 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vincent Hurley, United States of America v. Carlo Demarco, United States of America v. James Saccoccio, United States of America v. Stanley Cirella, United States of America v. Kenneth Saccoccio, United States of America v. Stephen Pizzo, United States of America v. Donna Saccoccia, United States of America v. Anthony Demarco
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Atisha, 804 F.2d 920, 927 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1067 , 107 S.Ct. 955 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1987). 65 The apparent strength of the argument is that the taped evidence showed these two appellants being told to assemble amounts over $10,000 and the "over $10,000" instruction appears to dovetail with this evidence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 527, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8949 United States of America v. John Jario Gil, United States of America v. Daniel Montoya
(2×)
The district court found that “the specific identity of that warehouse is of less materiality ... whereas ... the potential harm of disclosure of this material appears to be great.” The cross-examination limits did not interfere with the defendants’ ability “to expose to the jury facts from which the jurors, as the sole triers of fact and credibility, could appropriately draw inferences relating to the reliability of witnesses.” Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 318 , 94 S.Ct. 1105, 1111 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); see also United States v. Feldman, 788 F.2d 544, 554 (9th Cir.1986) (“The…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vreeken
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-1044.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1987.
Cited by 177 opinions | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.