green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Schrader v. Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.
No. 1 MEBAJNMU, AFL —CIO v. Defries, 943 F.2d 474 , 477-78 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1074 , 112 S.Ct. 972 , 117 L.Ed.2d 137 (1992); see Somnters Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan Enters., Inc., 793 F.2d 1456, 1459-60 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cigna Healthplan of Louisiana, Inc. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. State of Louisiana, Ex Rel. Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General
See Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan Enter., Inc., 793 F.2d 1456 (5th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 884 , 93 L.Ed.2d 837 , and cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Monroe R. Rokohl, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Texaco, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
See Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan Enter., Inc., 793 F.2d 1456 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 884 , 93 L.Ed.2d 837 , and cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson
See Sommers Drug Stores v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc., 793 F.2d 1456, 1460 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1034 , and cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 (1987) (defendants could be found fiduciaries with respect to sale of trust's stock only if they controlled trustees' decision to sell; such control not inferable from defendants' power to appoint trustees). -7- In sum, there was no possible basis for the court's conclusion that Cottrill was a fiduciary.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pens. Plan Guide P 23917o Arthur T. Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, Inc., Arthur T. Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, Inc.
See Sommers Drug Stores v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc., 793 F.2d 1456, 1460 (5th Cir.1986), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 884 , 93 L.Ed.2d 837 and cert, denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987) (defendants could be found fiduciaries with respect to sale of trust’s stock only if they controlled trustees’ decision to sell; such control not inferable from defendants’ power to appoint trustees).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson
See Sommers ___ _______ Drug Stores v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc., 793 F.2d 1456 , ____________ ___________________________ 1460 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1034 , and cert. ____________ _____ denied, 479 U.S. 1089 (1987) (defendants could be found ______ fiduciaries with respect to sale of trust's stock only if ____ they controlled trustees' decision to sell; such control not inferable from defendants' power to appoint trustees). -7- In sum, there was no possible basis for the court's conclusion that Cottrill was a fiduciary.
discussed
Cited "see"
Computer Associates International, Inc. v. American Fundware, Inc.
See Seismic Int’l Research Corp. v. South Ranch Oil Co., 793 F.2d 227, 232 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1297 , 94 L.Ed.2d 153 (1987); Harrison v. Luse, 760 F.Supp. 1394, 1401 (D.Colo.), aff'd, 951 F.2d 1259 (10th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Westbrook v. Beverly Enterprises
See Sommers Drug Stores v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc., 793 F.2d 1456, 1467 (5th Cir.1986), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Karim Faruq, A/K/A Charles Williams
See United States v. Binker, 799 F.2d 695 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 (1987); United States v. Boldin, 772 F.2d 719 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, Scarborough v. United States, 475 U.S. 1098 (1986). 3 22 As a threshold matter, we reserve judgment on whether the "due diligence" exception merits adoption in this Circuit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richmond v. American Systems Corp.
See Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan Enters., Inc., 793 F.2d 1456, 1467 (5th Cir.1986) (noting cases that treat state laws regulating traditional areas of state authority as less likely to be preempted, but expressing hesitation about using this principle as a determinative factor), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 884 , 93 L.Ed.2d 837 and 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987); Rebaldo v. Cuomo, 749 F.2d 133, 138 (2nd Cir.1984) (state scheme enacted to contain hospital costs under medicaid and medicare not preempted by ERISA because “[…
discussed
Cited "see"
Henry v. Black & Decker Inc.
The Applicable Law Section 1132 of Title 29 of the United States Code provides that a civil action may be brought in a United States district court by a participant or beneficiary to recover benefits due him or to clarify his rights to future benefits under a plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(1)(B), (e)(1); see Jameson v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. Pension Plan etc., 765 F.2d 49, 51 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1297 , 94 L.Ed.2d 153 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Memorial Hospital System v. Northbrook Life Insurance Company
See Robertson v. Alexander Grant & Co., 798 F.2d 868, 870 (5th Cir.1986) ("The regulations prescribed by the Secretary are ‘entitled to considerable deference, and we will uphold any interpretation that is reasonably defensible.’”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1296 , 94 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs, Harry P. Boggs and David B. Boggs
Since we affirm the district court's denial of Sandra Boggs' request for a declaratory judgment, she is not entitled to attorney's fees 2 Hook v. Morrison Milling Co., 38 F.3d 776, 780 (5th Cir.1994) 3 Ingersoll-Rand Company v. McClendon, 498 U.S. 133, 137 , 111 S.Ct. 478, 482 , 112 L.Ed.2d 474 (1990) 4 Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 , 103 S.Ct. 2890, 2897 , 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983) 5 Ingersoll-Rand Company, 498 U.S. at 137 , 111 S.Ct. at 482 6 Hook, 38 F.3d at 781 7 Shaw, 463 U.S. at 96-97 , 103 S.Ct. at 2900 8 Rozzell v. Security Services, Inc., 38 F.3d 819, 821 (5th Cir.1994) (…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Simpson v. Ernst & Young
See also Robertson v. Alexander Grant & Co., 798 F.2d 868, 871 (5th Cir.1986), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1296 , 94 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ehrlich v. Howe
Agreements covering only partners are not “employee benefit plans” governed by ERISA. 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-3 (1991); see also Robertson v. Alexander Grant & Co., 798 F.2d 868 (5th Cir.1986) (holding that plan covering only partners is not an ERISA plan), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1296 , 94 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Maza A/K/A Rafael Maza
See also United States v. Binker, 799 F.2d 695, 699 (11th Cir.1986) (per curiam), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1296 , 94 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987) ("assuming, but expressly not deciding, that this theory [due diligence as a bar to prosecution] would provide a ground” for relief). 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawrence v. Jackson MacK Sales, Inc.
See, e.g., Sommers Drug Stores v. Corrigan Enterprises, 793 F.2d 1456 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maza
See also United States v. Binker, 799 F.2d 695 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1296 , 94 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
See, e.g., Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc., 793 F.2d 1456, 1463-64 (5th Cir.1986) (Congress did not intend to permit plans to recover punitive damages from fiduciaries who breach their duties under ERISA), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 884 , 93 L.Ed.2d 837 and cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987); Leigh v. Engle, 669 F.Supp. 1390, 1413 (N.D.Ill.1987), aff'd, 858 F.2d 361 (7th Cir.1988); Utilicorp United Inc. v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 88-0129-CV-W-1 (W.D.Mo.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brad Harper v. American Chambers Life Insurance Company
See, e.g., Robertson v. Alexander Grant & Co., 798 F.2d 868, 870-71 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1296 , 94 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987); 29 C.F.R.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harper v. American Chambers Life Insurance
See, e.g., Robertson v. Alexander Grant & Co., 798 F.2d 868, 870-71 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1296 , 94 L.Ed.2d 152 (1987); 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-3 (b).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Utilcorp United Inc. Ex Rel. Utilicorp United Inc. Employee Benefit Plans Master Trust v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.
See, e.g., Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc., 793 F.2d 1456, 1462-64 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1089 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987); Leigh v. Engle, 669 F.Supp. 1390, 1413 (N.D.Ill.1987), aff'd, 858 F.2d 361 (7th Cir.1988); Bigger v. American Commercial Lines, Inc., 652 F.Supp. 123, 128 (W.D.Mo.1986). 6 For example, the Fifth Circuit in Sommers after a thorough analysis expressly found that “the language and legislative history of ERISA § 409(a) persuades us that Congress did not intend to permit plans to recover puniti…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kanarek
v.
Wambaugh
v.
Wambaugh
No. 86-969.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1987.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.