green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…the right of an accused to counsel of his choice ... is not absolute
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Walter A. Tolliver v. William Dallman
See Wilson, 761 F.2d at 281 n. 10; see also Bland v. California, Dep't of Corrections, 20 F.3d 1469, 1478 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 357 (1994); but see United States v. Allen, 789 F.2d 90 , 92 n. 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 (1986).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Person
the right of an accused to counsel of his choice ... is not absolute
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Person
the right of an accused to counsel of his choice ... is not absolute
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Earl Person
the right of an accused to counsel of his choice ... is not absolute
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Allen
See State v. Breazeale, 238 Kan. 714, 726-27 , 714 P.2d 1356 , cert. denied 479 U.S. 846 (1986) (finding omissions from affidavit were not material and trial court did not err in denying defendant’s request for evi-dentiary hearing); State v. Abu-Isba, 235 Kan. 851, 854-55 , 685 P.2d 856 (1984) (finding affidavit establishes probable cause); Wilbanks v. State, 224 Kan. 66, 74 , 579 P.2d 132 (1978) (holding Idaho complaint lacked information sufficient to support finding of prob able cause), overruled on other grounds by In re Habeas Corpus Application of Danko, 240 Kan. 431 , 731 P.2d 240 (1…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McLeod
See United States v. Allen, 789 F.2d 90, 93 (1st Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McLeod
See United States v. Allen, 789 F.2d 90, 93 (1st Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 164 , 93 L.Ed.2d 103 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moeller
(2×)
See State v. Breazeale, 238 Kan. 714 , 714 P.2d 1356, 1358 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 164 , 93 L.Ed.2d 102 (1986), (same result involving the use by the defendant of "a small handgun"); State v. Thomas, 110 Ariz. 106 , 515 P.2d 851, 853 (1973)(wherein the court relied in part on the defendant's use of "a knife" and that "the geographical location of the crimes was either in the defendant's neighborhood or in areas where he previously resided"); State v. Braman, 191 Conn. 670 , 469 A.2d 760, 764 (1983) ("a shotgun with a cut-down configuration and a small automatic pistol");…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Allen, 789 F.2d 90, 92 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 164 , 93 L.Ed.2d 103 (1986); United States v. Welty, 674 F.2d 185, 190 (3d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. DePrima
See United States v. Mest, 789 F.2d 1069 (4th Cir.) (holding that a change in the Federal Rules of Evidence which was procedural in nature does not violate the ex post facto clause), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 163 , 93 L.Ed.2d 102 (1986); United States v. Alexander, 805 F.2d 1458 (11th Cir.1986) (holding that new Rule 704(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence does not violate the ex post facto clause).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pierce
See id. ___ ___ We also are mindful that when, as here, the granting of the defendant's request would almost certainly necessitate a last-minute continuance, the trial judge's actions are entitled to extraordinary deference.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Westfahl
See State v. Breazeale, 238 Kan. 714, 729-30 , 714 P.2d 1356 , cert. denied 479 U.S. 846 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Ramon Kimble
See United States v. Mest, 789 F.2d 1069, 1071-72 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David D. Lawson
See Goins v. Lane, 787 F.2d 248, 254 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 165 , 93 L.Ed.2d 103 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Aguado
(2×)
See also United States v. Allen, 789 F.2d 90, 92 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S. Ct. 164 (1986); United States v. Whaley, 788 F.2d 581, 583 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 962 , 107 S. Ct. 458 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. T. Cheetham Sr.
(2×)
See also United States v. Allen, 789 F.2d 90, 92 (1st Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S. Ct. 164 (1986); United States v. Whaley, 788 F.2d 581, 583 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 962 . 107 S. Ct. 458 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
This court has stated plainly that “[rjemoteness in time, standing alone, is insufficient to establish reversible error in the admission of a prior conviction.” State v. Carter, 220 Kan. 16, 20-21 , 551 P.2d 821 (1976); see also State v. Breazeale, 238 Kan. 714, 723 , 714 P.2d 1356 (remoteness of 10-year-old convictions affected weight of prior crimes evidence rather than its admissibility), cert. denied 479 U.S. 846 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thunder Hawk Ex Rel. Jensen v. Union Pacific Railroad
GRAham, Federal Practice and Procedure: Evidence § 6651 (interim ed. 1992); see also United States v. Mest, 789 F.2d 1069, 1073-74 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 163 , 93 L.Ed.2d 102 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wag-Aero, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Lamport, 787 F.2d 474, 476 (10th Cir.) (“financial records”), cert. de *1497 nied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 166 , 93 L.Ed.2d 104 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cromwell
See, e.g., State v. Breazeale, 238 Kan. 714, 729-30 , 714 P.2d 1356 , cert, denied 479 U.S. 846 (1986); State v. Howell, 223 Kan. 282, 285-86 , 573 P.2d 1003 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Andrews
Discussion It is well established that “[a]n indigent criminal defendant has an absolute right to be represented by counsel, but he does not have the right to have a particular lawyer represent him, ... nor to demand a different appointed lawyer except for good cause.” Thomas v. Wainwright, 767 F.2d 738, 742 (11th Cir.1985) (citing Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 1610 , 75 L.Ed.2d 610 (1983)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1241 , 89 L.Ed.2d 349 (1986); see also United States v. Allen, 789 F.2d 90, 92 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 164 , 93 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sexton v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct
The Eighth Circuit, and several other circuits, have held that the statute could be applied retroactively “because it represented a procedural, as opposed to substantive, change in the applicable law.” U.S. v. Bartlett, 856 F.2d 1071 , 1077 n. 7 (8th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Mest, 789 F.2d 1069, 1072-73 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 163 , 93 L.Ed.2d 102 (1986); United States v. Prickett, 790 F.2d 35, 37 (6th Cir.1986); United States v. Alexander, 805 F.2d 1458, 1461-62 (11th Cir.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zaragoza
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-7201.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (3)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.