green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
6.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2004 · 2 courts ·
…under the weight of authority, insurance contracts have been said to be embraced in this statutory definition of 'property.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Morris v. National Union Fire Insurance (In Re Eastwind Group, Inc.)
under the weight of authority, insurance contracts have been said to be embraced in this statutory definition of 'property.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ochs v. Lipson (In Re First Central Financial Corp.)
under the weight of authority, insurance contracts have been said to be embraced in this statutory definition of 'property.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
American Bankers Insurance v. Maness
the prevailing view is that an insurance policy is property of the estate_
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Jack D. Maness, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Joseph L. Houska and Judy C. Houska, and Joseph L. Houska Judy C. Houska Cenit Bank, F.S.B., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, and American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida v. Jack D. Maness, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Joseph L. Houska and Judy C. Houska, and Joseph L. Houska Judy C. Houska Cenit Bank, F.S.B., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida v. Jack D. Maness, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Joseph L. Houska and Judy C. Houska, and Joseph L. Houska Judy C. Houska Cenit Bank, F.S.B.
the prevailing view is that an insurance policy is property of the estate....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Davis v. the Merv Griffin Co.
the clear implication of the decision is that, if there had been a contract to indemnify, a contrary result would have been in order
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
McCartney v. Integra National Bank North
Robins Co., Inc. v. Piccinin, 788 F.2d 994, 999 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 876 (1986), these courts have extended the automatic stay to nonbankrupt codefendants in “unusual circumstances.” As the case 7 law demonstrates, courts have found “unusual circumstances” where “there is such identity between the debtor and the third-party defendant that the debtor may be said to be the real party defendant and that a judgment against the third-party defendant will in effect be a judgment or finding against the debtor.” Id. at 999 (relying on both the automatic stay provision and the…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Plummer et ux.
v.
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
v.
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
No. 85-7195.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.