green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Money laundering and drug trafficking are often intimately connected.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Harris v. Ron Champion
But see Schandelmeier v. Cunningham, 819 F.2d 52, 54-55 (3d Cir.1986) (holding that because petitioner had not pursued procedures for presenting his claims based on sentencing delay to the state court, he had not exhausted his remedies and could not seek federal relief), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1584 , 94 L.Ed.2d 774 (1987). 64 Once exhaustion is excused, a federal court has the power to review the merits of a petitioner's habeas petition to the extent that it raises federal issues.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Harris v. Champion
But see Schandelmeier v. Cunningham, 819 F.2d 52, 54-55 (3d Cir.1986) (holding that because petitioner had not pursued procedures for presenting his claims based on sentencing delay to the state court, he had not exhausted his remedies and could not seek federal relief), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1584 , 94 L.Ed.2d 774 (1987).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Alberto Castro (89-1528), Ignacio Forte (89-1530), Guillermo Rocha (89-1531), Jaime Giraldo (89-1893), Norberto Giraldo (89-1894)
money laundering and drug trafficking are often intimately connected.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Goodwin
See United States v. Loscalzo, 18 F.3d 374, 385 (7th Cir.1994) (“[T]he decision not to call a witness is a tactical choice that is not subject to review.”) (citing Cartee v. Nix, 803 F.2d 296, 303 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1584 , 94 L.Ed.2d 774 (1987)); Jones v. United States, 918 A.2d 389, 409 (D.C.2007) (“[Djecisions concerning which witnesses to call at trial are often based on tactical considerations, and therefore, generally remain within the discretion of the defense *55 attorney.”); Lopez v. United States, 863 A.2d 852, 861-62 (D.C.2004) (“[T]he de…
cited
Cited "see"
F.C. Cycles International, Inc. v. Fila Sport, S.p.A.
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1441 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1585 , 94 L.Ed.2d 775 (1987) and cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yvonne Tunstall, United States of America v. Jerretta Hatcher
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1444-45 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 (1987). 11 Next, the Government did not violate Hatcher's due process rights by failing to disclose certain hospital records prior to trial.
cited
Cited "see"
Debra Christie v. Nona T. Switala
See Cartee v. Nix, 803 F.2d 296, 298-99 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nos. 94-1718, 94-5404
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1442 (4th Cir.1986) (including as questions of fact, whether a person sought to become a client, sought advice from the attorney, and expected the communications to remain confidential), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1585 , 94 L.Ed.2d 775 (1987). 9 Sweeney argues that he considers the memoranda and all conversations that Sweeney had with Arent Fox from March of 1992 to the end of 1993, to be confidential, and additionally, in the civil case, he seeks to protect all of Doe's statements made to John Clarke, Jr., who is the Union's attorney in …
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n v. Sweeney
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1442 (4th Cir.1986) (including as questions of fact, whether a person sought to become a client, sought advice from the attorney, and expected the communications to remain confidential), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1585 , 94 L.Ed.2d 775 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Paul Sarno
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437,1450 (4th Cir.1986) (holding that, where denial of severance was not abuse of discretion, any delay resulting from the joinder of defendant’s trial with co-defendant was properly excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1585 , 94 L.Ed.2d 775 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eusebio Dishmey
Evid. 403, 404(b); see United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1444 (4th Cir. 1986) (allowing evidence of prior drug dealings with co-defendant to show that defendant knew he was handling drug proceeds), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 (1987); United States v. Rhodes, 779 F.2d 1019, 1031 (4th Cir. 1985) (allowing evidence of defendant's prior cocaine convictions to refute claim that he lacked intent to commit drug offenses), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1182 (1986). 12 Balancing the probative value of evidence against its risk of undue prejudice is within the district court's discretion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rubin v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1585 , 94 L.Ed.2d 775 (1987) (where privilege issue presented complex issues of fact, record was consistent with trial judge’s finding that defendant, an attorney, spoke to another attorney, in law firm where both were employed, as a friend and not as attorney, even though still other attorneys in same firm were advising defendant concerning potential criminal charges).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Thomas Owens
That he may have been known generally as an unarmed nondangerous individual does not make any relevant fact more or less probable; the probation officer's testimony was thus irrelevant under Fed.R.Evid. 401. 10 With regard to the district court's admission of evidence that Owens's prior robbery conviction was a felony supporting the felony-firearm charge, when later evidence established that the robbery was only a misdemeanor, we agree that admission of this evidence was error; see United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1444 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 (1987) (evidence of extri…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Earl Sweeney, United States of America v. Gregory Rudolph Davis, A/K/A Rudy Davis, United States of America v. Frederick Allan Fleming, A/K/A Freddy Fleming
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1444 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 (1987); United States v. Masters, 622 F.2d 83 (4th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cornelius Snow
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1443-44 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 (1987) (evidence of plan to sell marijuana in the mid-1970's relevant for 1984 indictment relating to an expanded scheme to sell marijuana); Gallo, 782 F.2d at 1193-94 (evidence of drug deals between the defendant and a government witness happening four years prior to the charged offense was admissible to prove intent, scheme, opportunity, or business enterprise). 6 Snow further argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge used a definition of "distribution" in his jury instructi…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walton
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1444-45 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1585 , 94 L.Ed.2d 775 (1987); United States v. Holman, 680 F.2d 1340, 1352 (11th Cir.1982); United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 390 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); see also United States v. Dietrich, 854 F.2d 1056, 1058-60 (7th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walton
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1444-45 (4th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1585 , 94 L.Ed.2d 775 (1987); United States v. Holman, 680 F.2d 1340, 1352 (11th Cir.1982); United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 390 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); see also United States v. Dietrich, 854 F.2d 1056, 1058-60 (7th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Election Commission v. Franklin
See United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1443 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1585 , 94 L.Ed.2d 775 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jimmie L. Morrison v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden and Attorney General of the State of Indiana
See, e.g., Cartee v. Nix, 803 F.2d 296, 301-02 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1584 , 94 L.Ed.2d 774 (1987); Zellers v. Duckworth, 763 F.2d 250, 252-53 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 952 , 106 S.Ct. 319 , 88 L.Ed.2d 302 (1985); Williams v. Duckworth, 724 F.2d 1439, 1442 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 841 , 105 S.Ct. 143 , 83 L.Ed.2d 82 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Camden v. Circuit Court
Sutton v. Lash, 576 F.2d 738, 745 (7th Cir.1978) (citing Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 309 , 83 S.Ct. 745, 755 , 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963)); see also Cartee v. Nix, 803 F.2d 296, 298-99 (7th Cir.1986) (if state fact-finding procedures in postconviction proceedings provide defendant with a full and fair hearing, district court does not abuse its discretion when it declines to hold evidentiary hearing on habeas petition), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1584 , 94 L.Ed.2d 774 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Camden v. Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit
Sutton v. Lash, 576 F.2d 738, 745 (7th Cir.1978) (citing Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 309 , 83 S.Ct. 745, 755 , 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963)); see also Cartee v. Nix, 803 F.2d 296, 298-99 (7th Cir.1986) (if state fact-finding procedures in postconviction proceedings provide defendant with a full and fair hearing, district court does not abuse its discretion when it declines to hold evidentiary hearing on habeas petition), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1584 , 94 L.Ed.2d 774 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cartee
v.
Nix, Warden
v.
Nix, Warden
No. 86-6281.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1987.
480 U.S. 938
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.