Edwards v. United States, 481 U.S. 1019 (1987). · Go Syfert
Edwards v. United States, 481 U.S. 1019 (1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
85 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kendell Shawn Vanbelle A/K/A Shawn Vanbelle v. State (texapp, 2013-05-09) · Strongest negative: United States v. Regina Kay Garrett (ca5, 1993-02-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Regina Kay Garrett
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: but see · confidence high
See also United States v. Wulff, 758 F.2d 1121, 1125 (6th Cir.1985) (felony provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which prohibit the sale of migratory birds, violate due process because of “the absence of a requirement that the government prove some degree of scienter”); but see United States v. Engler, 806 F.2d 425, 432-34 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1900 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987) (declining to follow Wulff).
discussed Cited "see" Kendell Shawn Vanbelle A/K/A Shawn Vanbelle v. State
Tex. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Almanza v. State, 724 S.W.2d 805, 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1901 , 95 L.Ed.2d 507 (1987) (Almanza III); Almanza v. State, 696 S.W.2d 282 , 283-85 & n. 1 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1985) (Almanza II), aff'd, Almanza III. 7 .
cited Cited "see" Wilkerson v. State
Tex. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 171 (Tex.Crim.App.1984), cer t. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1901 , 95 L.Ed.2d 507 (1987).
discussed Cited "see" McDonnell v. United States
3rd Cir. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
The requesting individual must appeal an adverse determination to the head of the agency before filing suit in federal court. 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (a)(4), (6)(A)(ii); see Dettman v. Department of Justice, 802 F.2d 1472, 1476-77 (D.C.Cir.1986) (FOIA lawsuit subject to dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction if plaintiff fails to timely exhaust administrative remedies); accord Hymen v. Merit Systems Protection Bd., 799 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1900 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987); Brumley v. Department of Labor, 767 F.2d 444, 445 (8th Cir.1985); see …
discussed Cited "see" Baumgardner Oil Co. v. Commonwealth
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Engler, 806 F.2d 425 (3rd Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1900 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987). 10 The penalties contained in the SWMA, however, are not any harsher than the penalties contained in other federal statutes determined by the Supreme Court to be constitutional.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Fred Agron
2d Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wallace, 800 F.2d 1509, 1513 (9th Cir.1986) (stun gun is dangerous weapon under Federal Aviation Act of 1958, § 902(0, 49 U.S.C.App. § 1472(0), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1901 , 95 L.Ed.2d 507 (1987).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Nicholas Marino (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Engler, 806 F.2d 425 (3d Cir.1986) (“[t]o be entitled to an entrapment charge in this circuit, ‘a defendant must first present evidence both that the government initiated the crime ... and that the defendant was otherwise not predisposed to commit the crime.’ ”), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1900 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Cody J. Hutzell
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See generally United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 608 (1971); see also United States v. Meade, 175 F.3d 215, 225-26 (1st Cir. 1999), and United States v. Engler, 806 F.2d 425, 435 (3d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 (1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Cody Jeremiah Hutzell (2×)
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See generally United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 608 (1971); see also United States v. Meade, 175 F.3d 215, 225-26 (1st Cir. 1999), and United States v. Engler, 806 F.2d 425, 435 (3d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 (1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Stephen S. Boynton James R. Booth Bernard Dadds, Jr.
4th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Engler, 806 F.2d 425, 431 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1900 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987); United States v. Chandler, 753 F.2d 360, 363 (4th Cir.1985); United States v. Brandt, 717 F.2d at 958-59; United States v. Jarman, 491 F.2d 764, 766 (4th Cir.1974); United States v. Wood, 437 F.2d 91, 91 (9th Cir.1971); Rogers v. United States, 367 F.2d 998, 1001 (8th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 943 , 87 S.Ct. 976 , 17 L.Ed.2d 874 (1967); see also United States v. FMC Corp., 572 F.2d 902, 906 (2d Cir.1978) (stating that cases have “consistently held…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Giampa
D.N.J. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
As the Third Circuit has explained: “[T]he trial court will not instruct on entrapment unless the defendant has produced sufficient evidence on both prongs of the defense.” Fedroff, 874 F.2d at 181 ; Wright, 921 F.2d at 44 ; see also United States v. Engler, 806 F.2d 425, 428 (3d Cir.1986) (“To be entitled to an entrapment charge in this circuit, ‘a defendant must first present evidence both that the [Government initiated the crime ... and that the defendant was otherwise not predisposed to commit the crime.’ ” (quoting United States v. Gambino, 788 F.2d 938, 943 (3d Cir.), cert. d…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Engler, 806 F.2d 425 (1986) certiorari denied Engler v. United States, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1900 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Geier
Iowa · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Wallace, 800 F.2d 1509, 1513 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1901 , 95 L.Ed.2d 507 (1987) (finding stun gun to be a “dangerous weapon” for purposes of a federal airline violation, where “dangerous weapon” was statutorily defined as a weapon “likely to produce death or great bodily harm”); State v. Evans, 247 Mont. 218 , 806 P.2d 512, 516-17 (1991) (concluding that jury properly found a stun gun to be a weapon, where weapon was statutorily defined to be “any instru *172 ment, article or substance which, regardless of its primary …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edwards
v.
United States
No. 86-6279.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1987.
481 U.S. 1019
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.