green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“there is no evidence that knowingly and intentionally committed an act in conscious disregard for the rights of others.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Arriola v. Safeco
there is no evidence that knowingly and intentionally committed an act in conscious disregard for the rights of others.
discussed
Cited "see"
United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America v. Southern California District Council Of Carpenters
See Motion Picture & Videotape Editors Guild, Local 776 v. International Sound Technicians, 800 F.2d 973 , 975, amended and reh'g denied, 806 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir.1986), and cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 765 (1987). 15 The question here, however, is whether the Affiliation Agreement constitutes an internal governing document.
discussed
Cited "see"
United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Lathers Local 42-L v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners
See Motion Picture & Videotape Editors Guild, Local 776 v. International Sound Technicians, 800 F.2d 973 , 975, amended and reh’g denied, 806 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir.1986), and cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 765 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph E. O'Neill v. Air Line Pilots Association, International
See Motion Picture & Video *1207 tape Editors Guild, Local 776 v. International Sound Technicians, Local 695, 800 F.2d 973, 975 (9th Cir.1986) (a court should not disturb a union’s interpretations of its own documents “absent bad faith”), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 765 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cunningham v. Bank One
See Dawkins v. Sears Roebuck and Company, 109 F.3d 241, 243 (5th Cir.1997); see also Pinner v. Schmidt, 805 F.2d 1258, 1264 (5th Cir.1986)(holding that 60-day notice period begins to run “when a disputed statement is first received”), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 766 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Stuart Dawkins v. Sears Roebuck and Company
Further, the applicable regulation (known as “Regulation Z”) specifies that the 60-day period begins to run “after the creditor [has] transmitted the first periodic statement that reflects the alleged billing error.” 12 C.F.R. § 226.13 (b)(1) (emphasis added); see also Pinner v. Schmidt, 805 F.2d 1258, 1264 (5th Cir.1986) (holding that the 60-day notice period begins to run “when a disputed statement is first received”), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 1032, 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 3276, 97 L.Ed.2d 766, 780 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whelan v. Trans Union Credit Reporting Agency
The standard for evaluating the reasonableness of an agency’s procedures is “ “what a reasonably prudent person would do under the circumstances.’” Houston, 707 F.Supp. at 693 (citation omitted); see also Pinner v. Schmidt, 805 F.2d 1258, 1263 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 766 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull Metals
(2×)
See Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp. , 356 So.2d 1203 , 1204 (Ala. 1978); Hertz Equipment Rental Corp. v. Dravo Corp. , 360 So.2d 325 , 326 (Ala. 1978); Stauffer Chemical Co. v. McIntyre Electric Service, Inc. , 401 So.2d 745 , 746 (Ala. 1981); Union Camp Corp. v. McAbee Construction Co. , 465 So.2d 390 , 391-92 (Ala. 1985); see also Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. Cooper Stevedoring Co. , 504 So.2d 215 , 217 n. 4 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied , 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3268 , 97 L.Ed.2d 767 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. General Committee of Adjustment
Workers, 789 F.2d 1186, 1189 (5th Cir. 1986)); see also Motion Picture & Videotape Editors Guild, Local 776 v. Local 695, 800 F.2d 973 , 975, reh'g denied, 806 F.2d 1410 , (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 765 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local No. 48, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
See, e.g., Motion Picture & Videotape Editors Guild, Local 776 v. International Sound Technicians, Etc., Local 695, 800 F.2d 973, 975 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 765 (1987); Jou-Jou Designs, Inc. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 643 F.2d 905, 911 (2d Cir.1981); Tincher v. Piasecki, 520 F.2d 851, 854 (7th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Credit Bureau of Huntington, Inc.
Accord, Yohay v. City of Alexandria Employees Credit Union, Inc., 827 F.2d 967, 972 (4th Cir.1987); see also Pinner v. Schmidt, 805 F.2d 1258, 1263 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 766 , and cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 3276 , 97 L.Ed.2d 780 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lowe v. United States
“Plaintiff does not (and could not successfully) contend that his ‘injury’ was ‘inherently unknowable’; ‘the injury resulting from a termination of [active military service] is obviously ‘knowable’.’ ” Willcox, 3 Cl.Ct. at 85 , quoting Braude v. United States, 218 Ct.Cl. 270, 274 , 585 F.2d 1049 (1978); Collins, 14 Cl.Ct. at 752 ; see also Huntzinger v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 90, 96 (1985), aff'd, 809 F.2d 787 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 766 , reh’g denied, 483 U.S. 1056 , 108 S.Ct. 32 , 97 L.Ed.2d 820 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Millwright Local 1079 v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
See also Motion Picture & Videotape Editors Guild, Local 776 v. Local 695, 800 F.2d 973 , 975 (9th Cir.1986) (absent bad faith or special circumstances union’s interpretation of its constitution should not be disturbed by the court), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 765 (1987); Newell v. International B’hood of Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Stuart DAWKINS v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
Further, the applicable regulation (known as "Regulation Z") specifies that the 60-day period begins to run "after the creditor [has] transmitted the 3 first periodic statement that reflects the alleged billing error." 12 C.F.R. § 226.13 (b)(1) (emphasis added); see also Pinner v. Schmidt, 805 F.2d 1258, 1264 (5th Cir.1986) (holding that the 60- day notice period begins to run "when a disputed statement is first received"), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 1032, 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 3276, 97 L.Ed.2d 766, 780 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tata
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-1832.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 1987.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.