green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
10.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Rule 23, of course accords considerable discretion to a district court in fashioning notice to a class.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Rule 23, of course, accords considerable discretion to a district court in fashioning notice to a class.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Haukaas v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
a defendant has a due process right to be protected against unlimited multiple punishment for the same act.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mile High Cab, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission
the proper standard is whether there is a substantial probability-that is less than a preponderance but more than a mere possibility-that if damages are awarded, the claims of earlier litigants would exhaust the defendants' assets.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re \Agent Orange\" Prod. Liability Litig."
agent 14 orange i opt-out op.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re \Agent Orange\" Prod. Liability Litig."
agent 9 orange i opt-out op.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carlough v. Amchem Products, Inc.
rule 23, of course accords considerable discretion to a district court in fashioning notice to a class.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust Litigation
rule 23, of course, accords considerable discretion to a district court in fashioning notice to a class.
cited
Cited "see"
Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. v. Universal American Mortgage Co.
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 597 F.Supp. 740, 810 (E.D.N.Y.1984), aff 'd, 818 F.2d 145 (2nd Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 648 (1988). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Arar v. Ashcroft
See Chaser Shipping Corp. v. U.S., 649 F.Supp. 736, 739 (S.D.N.Y.1986), affd, 819 F.2d 1129 (2d Cir.1987) (affirming dismissal by district court of tort claims by foreign shipping company against United States under covert military operations in Nicaragua), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988), rehrg. denied, 487 U.S. 1243 , 108 S.Ct. 2921 , 101 L.Ed.2d 952 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Painewebber Incorporated Limited Partnerships Litigation
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 161-74 (2d Cir.1987) (addressing class members’ objections on appeal from a judicially approved class action settlement), cert. denied sub nom., Pinkney v. Dow Chemical, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 648 (1988); Parklane Hosiery, 606 F.2d at 357 (recognizing class members’ right to appeal from a final judgment).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca2 1995
See In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, 597 F.Supp. 740 (E.D.N.Y.1984) (approving settlement agreement), aff'd, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 (1988); In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, 611 F.Supp. 1396 (E.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 818 F.2d 179 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234 (1988); In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, 689 F.Supp. 1250 (E.D.N.Y.1988) (adopting guidelines for settlement distribution).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thurston v. United States
Devine v. Cook, 3 Utah 2d 134 , 279 P.2d 1073, 1080 (1955); Hall v. Blackham, 18 Utah 2d 164 , 417 P.2d 664 (1966); see Allen v. United States, 588 F.Supp. 247 (D.Utah 1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 694 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988). 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1993
See Independent Community Bankers Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 820 F.2d 428 , 434 (D.C.Cir.1987) (clear meaning of a statute can be overridden only by a clearly contrary legislative intent), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlanta College of Medical & Dental Careers, Inc. v. Riley
See Independent Community Bankers Ass’n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 820 F.2d 428, 434 (D.C.Cir.1987) (clear meaning of a statute can be overridden only by a clearly contrary legislative intent), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.
Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions § 11.-42, at 454 (2d ed. 1977) (same); see generally, In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 597 F.Supp. 740 (E.D.N.Y. 1984), aff'd, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Koppie v. Busey
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 210 (2d Cir.1987) cert. denied sub nom., Fraticelli v. Dow Chemical Co., 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 648 (1988); Barnson v. United States, 816 F.2d 549 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 484 U.S. 896 , 108 S.Ct. 229 , 98 L.Ed.2d 188 (1987); Aslakson v. United States, 790 F.2d 688 (8th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
See In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, 597 F.Supp. 740, 785 (E.D.N.Y.1984), aff'd on other grounds, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maiorana v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
See In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation, 597 F.Supp. 740, 785 (E.D.N.Y.1984), aff’d on other grounds, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson ex rel. Estate of Johnson v. United States, Department of Interior
See Allen v. United States, 816 F.2d 1417, 1424-25 (10th Cir.1987) (McKay, J., concurring) (concern that the discretionary function exception has been interpreted to apply "in all but the most trivial of matters"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 694 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988). .While characterized as the Berkovitz analysis, the contours of the discretionary function exception evolved from three important United States Supreme Court decisions: Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953); United States v. S.A.
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Liberty National Life Insurance
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 168-69 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hurst
See generally United States v. Saipaia, 24 MJ 172 (CMA 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 694 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litig.
See McKinney v. United States Postal Service , 292 F.R.D. 62 , 66-68 (D.D.C. 2013) (discussing the flexible notice requirements under Rule 23 ); see also In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litig. , 818 F.2d 145 , 168 (2d Cir. 1987) ( Rule 23"accords considerable discretion to a district court in fashioning notice to a class."), cert. denied , 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 648 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigation
See McKinney v United States Postal Service, 292 F.R.D.62, 66-68 (D.D.C. 2013) (discussing the flexible notice requirements under Rule 23); see also In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litig., 818 F. 2d 145, 168 (2d Cir. 1987) (Rule 23 “accords considerable discretion to a district court in fashioning notice to a class.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christopher Petrovic v. Amoco Oil Co.
See Grunin, 513 F.2d at 122 (finding that a notice "may consist of a very general description of the proposed settlement"); see also In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 170 (2nd Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Petrovic v. Amoco Oil Co.
See Grunin, 513 F.2d at 122 (finding that a notice “may consist of a very general description of the proposed settlement”); see also In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 170 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 648 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pagnucco v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
As one court put it, “court records are full of the conflicting opinions of doctors, engineers and accountants, to name just a few of the legions of expert witnesses.” United States v. Stifel, 433 F.2d 431, 438 (6th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 994 , 91 S.Ct. 1232 , 28 L.Ed.2d 531 (1971); see also In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 172 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Disaster At Lockerbie Scotland On December 21, 1988
As one court put it, "court records are full of the conflicting opinions of doctors, engineers and accountants, to name just a few of the legions of expert witnesses." United States v. Stifel, 433 F.2d 431, 438 (6th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 994 , 91 S.Ct. 1232 , 28 L.Ed.2d 531 (1971); see also In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 172 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
(2×)
The Court unequivocally adopted the Supreme Court’s holding that, where evidence is relevant, material, and favorable to the defense, such evidence “is constitutionally required to be admitted.” See United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal, 458 U.S. 858, 867 , 102 S.Ct. 3440, 3446 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1193 (1982), cited in United States v. Dorsey, supra at 5 and United States v. Colon-Angueira, 16 MJ at 26; see also United States v. Saipaia, 24 MJ 172, 175 (CMA 1987) (“Primarily, Mil.R.Evid. 412 is a rule of relevance, specifically concerned with the relevance of the victim’s sexual past in a tria…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re New York Asbestos Litigation
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 100 F.R.D. 718 (E.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 648 (1988); Jenkins v. Raymark Indus., 782 F.2d 468 (5th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baum v. United States
See, e.g., In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 210 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 648 (1988); Barnson v. United States, 816 F.2d 549 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 896 , 108 S.Ct. 229 , 98 L.Ed.2d 188 (1987); Aslakson v. United States, 790 F.2d 688 (8th Cir.1986); Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); DePass v. United States, 479 F.Supp. 373 (D.Md.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Renaud v. Martin Marietta Corp.
See, e.g., Allen v. United States, 588 F.Supp. 247, 413 (D.Utah 1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 694 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bates v. Tenco Services, Inc.
See e.g., In Re "Agent Orange"Product Liability Litigation, 100 F.R.D. 718 (E.D.N.Y.1983) aff'd, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, sub nom Pinkney v. Dow Chemical Co., 484 U.S. 1004 , 108 S.Ct. 695 , 98 L.Ed.2d 647 (1988) (different members of the plaintiff class had causes of action against some but not other defendant chemical companies); See also, In Re Asbestos School Litigation, 104 F.R.D. 422 (E.D.Pa.1984). .
DuPage Bank & Trust Co.
v.
Property Tax Appeal Board of the Illinois Department of Revenue
v.
Property Tax Appeal Board of the Illinois Department of Revenue
No. 87-289.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1988.
484 U.S. 1004
App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.