green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1998 ·
…he central inquiry is whether the overall jury examination, coupled with the jury charge, adequately protects the defendant from prejudice.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Thomas Edward Cordova, Frankie Cordova, Harold Leonard Dominguez
he central inquiry is whether the overall jury examination, coupled with the jury charge, adequately protects the defendant from prejudice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Thomas Cordova
he central inquiry is whether the overall jury examination, coupled with the jury charge, adequately protects the defendant from prejudice.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pethel v. McBride
(2×)
See, Casper v. Ryan, 822 F.2d 1283, 1289-90 (3rd Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 714 , 98 L.Ed.2d 664 (1988), (claim for violation of IAD cognizable in federal habeas action only upon showing of fundamental defect); Tinghitella v. California, 718 F.2d 308, 310-11 (9th Cir.1983) (habeas relief available for violation of IAD, a federal law, where violation constitutes fundamental defect).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mills v. Social Security
The regulations place much weight on objective evidence and the ALJ may disregard subjective claims of pain if they are unsubstantiated and he does not credit them. 20 C.F.R. § 416.929 ; accord Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 713 , 98 L.Ed.2d 663 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pepka v. Apfel
See Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 713 , 98 L.Ed.2d 663 (1988); see also Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanchez v. Apfel
See Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 713 , 98 L.Ed.2d 663 (1988); see also Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene H. Mathison, United States of America v. Perry Gobel, United States of America v. Robert E. Holmes, United States of America v. Dean G. Chambers
See United States v. Eagle Hawk, 815 F.2d 1213, 1217 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 712 , 98 L.Ed.2d 662 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene H. Mathison
(2×)
See United States v. Eagle Hawk, 815 F.2d 1213, 1217 (8th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boisvert v. Callahan
See Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 713 , 98 L.Ed.2d 663 (1988); see also Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nguyen v. Callahan
See Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 713 , 98 L.Ed.2d 663 (1988); see also Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera v. SHHS
See Rodriguez Pagan v. ___ ________________ Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st ________________________________________ Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988). ____________ 4.
cited
Cited "see"
Rivera v. SHHS
See Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988). 14 4.
cited
Cited "see"
Garcia-Martinez v. Commissioner of SS
See Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988). 4 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Garcia-Martinez v. Commissioner of SS
See Rodriguez Pagan v. ___ ________________ Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st ________________________________________ Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988). ____________ 3.
cited
Cited "see"
Lara v. State
Accord Casper v. Ryan, 822 F.2d 1283, 1292 (3rd Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 714 , 98 L.Ed.2d 664 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Campos v. Coughlin
See Martinelli v. Dugger, 817 F.2d 1499, 1505 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 714 , 98 L.Ed.2d 664 (1988) (in free exercise of religion case there is no requirement that inmate's belief be shared by a majority of the religion’s adherents). 14 .
cited
Cited "see"
Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
See Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 713 , 98 L.Ed.2d 663 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lucila Nazario Echevarria v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
See Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988); Lugo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 794 F.2d 14, 17 (1st Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Makuch v. Halter
Instead, this Court “must affirm the [Commissioner’s] findings if they are supported by substantial evidence.” Cashman v. Shalala, 817 F.Supp. 217, 220 (D.Mass.1993); see also Rodriguez Pagan v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987) (stating that the Commissioner’s determination must be affirmed, “even if the record arguably could justify a different conclusion, so long as it is supported by substantial evidence”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 713 , 98 L.Ed.2d 663 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Victor Guy Johnson
(2×)
App. 2, S 2, Article III(b); see also Casper v. Ryan, 822 F.2d 1283, 1293 (3rd Cir. 1987) cert. denied 484 U.S. 1012 (1988) (failure to send request by certified mail irrelevant if the letter is actually received).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Swanick v. SSA
Substantial evidence is "such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)); see also Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1987), cert, denied 484 U.S. 1012 (1988). 2 When making factual findings, the Commissioner must weigh and resolve conflicts in the evidence, settle credibility issues, and draw inferences from the record evidence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moe
See, e.g., Casper v. Ryan, 822 F.2d 1283, 1292-93 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 714 , 98 L.Ed.2d 664 (1988); Gearheart v. Wallace, 964 F.Supp. 205, 209 (E.D.Va.1997); State v. Toste, 198 Conn. 573 , 504 A.2d 1036, 1045 (1986); State v. Bass, 320 N.W.2d 824, 828 (Iowa 1982); Isaacs v. State, 31 Md.App. 604 , 358 A.2d 273, 277-78 (1976); State v. Nearhood, 2 Neb.App. 915 , 518 N.W.2d 165, 170 (1994); Eckard v. Commonwealth, 20 Va. App. 619 , 460 S.E.2d 242, 246 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ingram v. SSA
Substantial evidence is "'such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'" Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)); see also Rodriquez Pagan v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987, cert, denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Velez v. SHHS
We review the Secretary's decision under a "substantial evidence" standard; we will affirm that decision if it is supported by "`such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'" Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 , 401 __________ _______ (1971) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. ________________________ ____ 197, 229 (1938)); see also Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of ________ _______________ ____________ Health & Human Servs., 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1987) (per ______________________ curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988). ___…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Velez v. SHHS
We review the Secretary's decision under a "substantial evidence" standard; we will affirm that decision if it is supported by " 'such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.' " Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)); see also Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988). 4 The medical record reveals that Velez was seen at the Mental Health Center in Arecibo on July 28, 1992.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Roberson
Johnson v. Stagner, 781 F.2d 758, 761-62 (9th Cir. 1986); see also Casper v. Ryan, 822 F.2d 1283 (3d Cir. 1987) (no certificate), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988); Thurman v. Maryland, 89 Md.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fillmore v. Ordonez
See Wilson v. Prasse, 325 F.Supp. 9, 13 (W.D.Pa. 1971), aff'd, 463 F.2d 109 (3d Cir.1972); see also Martinelli v. Dugger, 817 F.2d 1499, 1508 (11th Cir.1987) (prisoner’s religious belief that he should eat only kosher meats entitled him only to select non-pork items from the prison’s regular menu), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 714 , 98 L.Ed.2d 664 (1988); Abernathy v. Cunningham, 393 F.2d 775, 778 (4th Cir.1968) (prisoner could obtain adequate ration from cafeteria selection by voluntarily avoiding pork or food cooked in grease or lard; prison not required to provide special rel…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rafael Hernandez-Torres v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
He has also been diagnosed as suffering from chronic allergic rhinitis and mild chronic obstructive lung disease. 4 Under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g), our standard of review is whether the Secretary's findings are supported by "substantial evidence." Although the record may arguably support more than one conclusion, we must uphold the Secretary, "if a reasonable mind, reviewing the evidence in the record as a whole, could accept it as adequate to support his conclusion." Ortiz v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 955 F.2d 765, 769 (1st Cir. 1991…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez-Torres v. SHHS
Under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), our standard of review is whether the Secretary's findings are supported by "substantial evidence." Although the record may arguably support more than one conclusion, we must uphold the Secretary, "if a reasonable mind, reviewing the evidence in the record as a whole, could accept it as adequate to support his conclusion." Ortiz v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., _____ ____________________________________ 955 F.2d 765, 769 (1st Cir. 1991) (quoting Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 647 F.2d 218, 222…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Domingo Santiago Serra v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
See, e.g., Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1987) (per curium), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988); Gonzalez-Ayala, 807 F.2d 255, 256 (1st Cir.1986) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard W. Norton v. Al C. Parke
See also Casper v. Ryan, 822 F.2d 1283, 1285 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 , 108 S.Ct. 714 , 98 L.Ed.2d 664 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martinelli
v.
Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
v.
Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
No. 87-5407.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1988.
484 U.S. 1012
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.