green
Positive treatment
10.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
(2×)
The Seventh and Eighth Circuits have construed the phrase broadly to include those instances where a “defendant is either ‘legally or administratively’ unavailable.” Collins, 90 F.3d at 1426 ; see United States v. Roy, 830 F.2d 628, 635 (7th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988); Young v. Mabry, 596 F.2d 339, 343 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 853 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
MacKrill v. State
See United States v. Brady, 819 F.2d 884, 888 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1032 , 98 L.Ed.2d 996 (1988) (applying Quarles despite factual differences).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lutz
(Table) (citing Quarles, 467 U.S. at 655-56 , 659 n. 8, 104 S.Ct. 2626 ); see United States v. Carrillo, 16 F.3d 1046, 1049 (9th Cir.1994) (“In determining whether the public safety exception to Miranda applies, ‘we ask whether there was an objectively reasonable need to protect the police or the public from any. immediate danger.’”) (quoting United States v. Brady, 819 F.2d 884 , 888 n. 3 (9th Cir.1987) (quoting Quarles, 467 U.S. at 659 , 104 S.Ct. 2626 ), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1032 , 98 L.Ed.2d 996 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Commonwealth
See United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601, 605 (8th Cir.1987), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988): [W]e conclude that the evidence regarding S.A.’s hymen did not establish the existence of an "injury.” The witnesses expressly disavowed finding any evidence of tears to S.A.’s hymen, cuts, scratches, bruises, blood, injury to the vaginal canal, tears that may have healed, or scars.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Creech
See United States v. Carrillo, 16 F.3d 1046, 1049 (9th Cir.1994) “(In determining whether the public safety exception to Miranda applies, ‘we ask whether there was an objectively reasonable need to protect the police or the public from any immediate danger.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Brady, 819 F.2d 884 , 888 n. 3 (9th Cir.1987) (quoting Quarles, 467 U.S. at 659 , 104 S.Ct. at 2649 ), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1032 , 98 L.Ed.2d 996 (1988)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert E. King
See United States v. Sblendorio, 830 F.2d 1382, 1391-92 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1034 , 98 L.Ed.2d 998 (1988); see also Butler, 71 F.3d at 255 . 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nyguyen A. Watts
See United States v. Sblendorio, 830 F.2d 1382, 1394 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1034 , 98 L.Ed.2d 998 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
James F. Shaw v. United States
See United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
James Shaw v. United States
See United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601 (8th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. White Buffalo
See United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601, 604 (8th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William White Buffalo, United States of America v. Ernest White Buffalo
See United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601, 604 (8th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chapman
See United States v. Roy, 830 F.2d 628, 638 (7th Cir.1987) ("[A]cquittal on the charges for which the defendant was held in custody at the time of the escape is not a defense to the escape charge under 18 U.S.C. § 751 (a)."), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988); United States v. Allen, 432 F.2d 939, 940 (10th Cir.1970) (per curiam) ("[N]either the regularity of [a defendant's] arrest nor the propriety of his confinement can be tested by an act of escape.").
discussed
Cited "see"
Nurse v. State
Weller; see Caulder v. State, 500 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 297 (Fla. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988); Budd v. State, 477 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Bufford v. State, 473 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Silvestri v. State, 332 So.2d 351 (Fla. 4th DCA), approved, 340 So.2d 928 (Fla. 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Boyce Eugene Abney, United States of America v. William Henry Fendell
Id.; see United States v. Hernandez, 825 F.2d 846 , 849 & n. 5 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moultrie
Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 , 103 S.Ct. 1319 , 75 L.Ed. (2d) 229 (1983) (“[T]he fact that the officers did not believe there was probable cause and proceeded on a consensual Terry-stop rationale would not foreclose the State from justifying [the defendant’s] custody by proving probable cause____”); see generally United States v. Hernandez, 825 F. (2d) 846 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1032 , 98 L.Ed. (2d) 996 (1988) (a warrantless pat-down search of the defendant’s person that produced a counterfeit bill was outside the scope of a permissible Terry search …
discussed
Cited "see"
Elbert Whaley Jones v. Gary Jerrison, Parole Officer Cranston Mitchell, Board of Probation and Parole and the Attorney General of Missouri
See Hulstine v. Morris, 819 F.2d 861, 863-64 (8th Cir.1987) (“Due process requirements may be satisfied if a defendant receives actual notice of the charges against him_”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1034 , 98 L.Ed.2d 998 (1988); Franklin v. White, 803 F.2d 416, 417 (8th Cir.1986) (stating that Fourteenth Amendment incorporates Sixth Amendment right to reasonable notice of criminal charges), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1020 , 107 S.Ct. 1904 , 95 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987); Goodloe v. Parratt, 605 F.2d 1041, 1045 (8th Cir.1979) (same) (citing In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 , 68 S.Ct. 499 , 92 L…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Vargas, United States of America v. Audel Ceja Berduzco
See United States v. Brady, 819 F.2d 884, 887 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marietta Joyce Chappell, Charles Edward Gibson, Robert Nathaniel Mitchem, and Rita Ann Shephard
See United States v. Hernandez, 825 F.2d 846 (5th Cir.1987) (officers had probable cause to arrest defendants matching physical description provided by witness near scene of crime shortly after commission), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1032 , 98 L.Ed.2d 996 (1988). 22 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth T. Hayward, and William B. Krause, Jr.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
SeeFreytag v. C.I.R., --- U.S. ----, ----, 111 S.Ct. 2631, 2638 , 115 L.Ed.2d 764 (1991) (noting that courts should have " 'a deep reluctance to interpret a statutory provision so as to render superfluous other provisions in the same enactment' "); see alsoUnited States v. Roy, 830 F.2d 628, 634 (7th Cir.1987) (stating that in construing a legislative enactment, "we presume that the legislature intended that each section was a necessary component of the statutory scheme and not surplusage"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Patino
See United States v. Sblendorio, 830 F.2d 1382, 1390-91 (7th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence A. Saffeels
See United States v. Roy, 830 F.2d 628 , 632-33 & n. 3 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kevin Lee Johnson
See United States v. Brady, 819 F.2d 884, 885 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988). 3 Johnson argues that this case is distinguishable from both Quarles and Brady because in those cases the officers were responding to a report of a crime and had accurate eyewitness descriptions.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Barry Kramer, Randy Thomas Lanier, Eugene Albert Fischer, and Kay Dee Bell, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Sblendorio, 830 F.2d 1382 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1034 , 98 L.Ed.2d 998 (1988) (upholding an instruction that differed from that of Silvern where early in the deliberations one juror stated that he believed the evidence insufficient to convict any defendant on any count). 42 The appellants claim that this case is different from D'Antonio and Thibodeaux because the district court knew that there was one holdout juror when it instructed the jury to continue its deliberations.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Costello
See United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601, 609 (8th Cir. 1987), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988) (child abuse victim’s statements about abuse are exceptional circumstances under rule 803 [24]).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl Wayne Campbell
See United States v. Johnson, 815 F.2d 309, 312 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1032 , 98 L.Ed.2d 996 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alphonso Martinez
See United States v. Sblendorio, 830 F.2d 1382, 1396 (7th Cir.1987) (“[W]hen the defendants do not object to the improper portions of a closing argument, only error both ‘plain’ and ‘harmful’ supports a new trial.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1034 , 98 L.Ed.2d 998 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Jesus Torres
See United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601, 607 (8th *1474 Cir.1987) (“evidence of past sexual behavior to prove the ‘source of the semen’ would ... be limited to sexual activity occurring a short time, probably a few days, before the alleged rape.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988); cf. United States v. Eagle Thunder, 893 F.2d 950, 954 (8th Cir.1990) (deviation from restraints of Rule 412 allowed only where evidence establishes injury sustained reasonably close in time to alleged rape.); United States v. Azure, 845 F.2d 1503, 1505-06 (8th Cir.1988) (s…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecil Arnold Odom, A/K/A Bud Kelly
The Seventh Circuit has written, "[i]n a close case, it may be appropriate to allow a party to comment in argument on the significance of a witness' absence, even where there is insufficient evidence of unavailability to warrant a missing witness instruction." United States v. Keplinger, 776 F.2d 678, 702-3 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1183 (1986); see United States v. Sblendorio, 830 F.2d 1382, 1394 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Foster
See United States v. Roy, 830 F2d 628, 633 (7th Cir 1987), cert den 484 US 1068 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward B. Ellis, A/K/A Rocco Ellis
See United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601, 610 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988); United States v. Dorian, 803 F.2d 1439 (8th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Young
See Caulder v. State, 500 So.2d 1362, 1366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 297 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988); State v. Row, 478 So.2d 430 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); State v. Samudio, 460 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Malave
See, e.g., United States v. Sblendorio, 830 F.2d 1382, 1394 (7th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S. Ct. 1034 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Koutras
See also, United States v. Roy, 830 F.2d 628 (7th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dean William Cotnam and Phillip Zadurski
We have consistently emphasized that such references violate the Fifth Amendment only when “it is highly unlikely that anyone other than the defendant could rebut the evidence.” Freeman, 962 F.2d at 1260 (quoting United States v. DiCaro, 852 F.2d 259, 263 (7th Cir.1988)); Buege, 578 F.2d at 189 (finding violation “where it is highly unlikely that at least a portion of the testimony could have been contradicted by anyone other than the defendant”); Williams v. Lane, 826 F.2d 654, 665 (7th Cir.1987) (quoting Buege); Burke, 756 F.2d at 1301 (same); see also United States v. Sblendorio, 83…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Terrell Johnson
This argument lacks merit. 10 The Miranda rights advisement requirement need not "be applied in all its rigor to a situation in which police officers ask questions reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety." New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649, 656 (1984); see also United States v. Brady, 819 F.2d 884, 888 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Doe, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601, 609 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988); see also United States v. Dunn, 851 F.2d 1099, 1101 (8th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Delbert Jackson Barrett v. State of Oklahoma Tulsa County
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 815 F.2d 309, 312 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 (1988) (citing cases). 1 5 Barrett also contends that he was denied due process in his state trial as a result of the joinder of the rape and molestation charges and by several evidentiary rulings.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Flanagan v. State
See also United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601, 608 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roy Spotted War Bonnet
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Shaw, 824 F.2d 601, 609-10 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1033 , 98 L.Ed.2d 997 (1988); United States v. DeNoyer, 811 F.2d 436, 438 (8th Cir.1987); United States v. Cree, 778 F.2d 474, 478 (8th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walter J. Blair v. Bill Armontrout, Walter J. Blair v. Bill Armontrout
(2×)
See Johnson v. Trickey, 882 F.2d 316, 320 (8th Cir.1989); Wright v. Lockhart, 854 F.2d 309, 312 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2077 , 104 L.Ed.2d 642 (1989); Franklin, 803 F.2d at 418 ; see also Hulstine v. Morris, 819 F.2d 861, 864 (8th Cir.1987) ("Due Process requirements may be satisfied if a defendant receives actual notice of the charges against him, even if the indictment or information is deficient.") (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1068 , 108 S.Ct. 1034 , 98 L.Ed.2d 998 (1988); Williams v. Nix, 751 F.2d 956, 961 (8th Cir.) ("The omission of any ex…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roy
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-5760.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1988.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.