green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mariner Energy, Inc. v. Devon Energy Production Co.
under the substantive law of louisiana, the technical meaning of the technical terms used in the was relevant.... what better way is there to discover the technical meaning than through the use of federal rule of evidence 702.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Twin County Grocers, Inc. v. Mendez and Co., Inc.
once a trademark owner sells his products, the buyer ordinarily may resell the product under the original mark without incurring any trademark law liability.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Galen Green
See United States v. Olavarrieta, 812 F.2d 640, 643 (11th Cir.) (per curiam) (summary judgment properly granted where defendant did not deny borrowing federally insured student loan money), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 107 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
IBP, Inc. v. Hady Enterprises, Inc.
See Shell Oil Co. v. Commercial Petroleum, Inc., 928 F.2d 104, 107 (4th Cir.1991) (citing NEC Electronics v. CAL Circuit Abco, 810 F.2d 1506 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 108 (1987)).
cited
Cited "see"
Reeder v. Burlington Northern Railroad
See Mosco v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R., 817 F.2d 1088, 1091 (4th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 108 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Jack Hayter v. City of Mount Vernon, Harold Sullivan, Jr., Franklin County Reserve Deputy, Tyler Bannister, Mount Vernon Police Officer
See Phillips Oil Co. v. OKC Corp., 812 F.2d 265 , 280 n. 32 (5th Cir.) (explaining that the “manifest error” standard is harmonious with the “abuse of discretion” standard as applied to this issue in other Fifth Circuit cases), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 107 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Betaco, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Company
See Texas Refrigeration Supply, Inc. v. FDIC, 953 F.2d 975, 982 (5th Cir.1992) (citing Phillips Oil Co. v. OKC Corp., 812 F.2d 265 , 274 n. 15 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 107 (1987)); see generally Sarsha v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 3 F.3d 1035, 1041 (7th Cir.1993) (collecting cases).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond A. MacDonald
See United States v. Olavarrieta, 812 F.2d 640, 643 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 (1987). 7 AFFIRMED. 1 Congress has now eliminated the November 15, 1992 "sunset date." See Pub.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ervin B. Johnson
See United States v. Olavarrieta, 812 F.2d 640, 644 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 (1987); United States v. Robbins, 819 F.Supp. 672, 679 (E.D.Mich.1993). 6 Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robbins
See United States v. Olavarri eta, 812 F.2d 640, 643 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied,, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 107 .
discussed
Cited "see"
63 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1567, 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,003 Patricia Gallegos v. City and County of Denver Federico Pena William Roberts David Miller Kathy Archuleta Allegra Haynes Kevin Marchman Larry Fullerton John Mrozek Ruth Rodriguez Michael Musgrave Randy Alexander Ron Younger George Doughty, King Harris
See Trujillo v. Grand Junction Regional Ctr., 928 F.2d 973, 977 (10th Cir.1991) (quoting Tafoya v. Adams, 816 F.2d 555 , 558 n. 5 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 108 (1987)) (§ 1983 " 'creates only a remedy for violations of rights secured by federal statutory and constitutional law' "); Dixon v. City of Lawton, 898 F.2d 1443, 1448 (10th Cir.1990) (§ 1985(3) does not provide a substantive right, but is a procedural statute which provides a remedy for a deprivation of an existing right).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gallegos v. City & County of Denver
See Trujillo v. Grand Junction Regional Ctr., 928 F.2d 973, 977 (10th Cir.1991) (quoting Tafoya v. Adams, 816 F.2d 555 , 558 n. 5 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 108 (1987)) (§ 1983 “ ‘creates only a remedy for violations of rights secured by federal statutory and constitutional law’ ”); Dixon v. City of Lawton, 898 F.2d 1443, 1448 (10th Cir.1990) (§ 1985(3) does not provide a substantive right, but is a procedural statute which provides a remedy for a deprivation of an existing right).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferrero U.S.A., Inc. v. Ozak Trading, Inc. Doron Gratch
See NEC Elecs. v. Cal Circuit Abco, 810 F.2d 1506 (9th Cir. Feb. 24, 1987), (holding that parallel importation of genuine goods does not violate Lanham Act), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 108 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Jack HAYTER v. CITY OF MOUNT VERNON, et al
See Phillips Oil Co. v. OKC Corp., 812 F.2d 265 , 280 n.32 (5th Cir.) (explaining that the “manifest error” standard is harmonious with the “abuse of discretion” standard as applied to this issue in other Fifth Circuit cases), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foremost Signature Insurance Company v. Silverboys, LLC
See Joe Grasso & Son, 380 F.2d at 751 (recognizing that “when the defendant’s right against the third party is merely an outgrowth of the same core of facts which determines the plaintiff’s claim, impleader is properly used ‘to reduce litigation by having one lawsuit do the work of two,’” but applying “the obverse rule . . . that an entirely separate and independent claim cannot be maintained against a third party under Rule 14, even though it does arise out of the same general set of facts as the main claim.”) (citations omitted); see also United States v. Olavarrieta, 812 F.2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Upper Deck Authenticated, Ltd. v. CPG DIRECT
Compare NEC Electronics v. CAL Circuit Abco, 810 F.2d 1506, 1509 (9th Cir.) (holding, in case involving sales of computer chips, that “[o]nce a trademark owner sells his product, the buyer ordinarily may resell the product under the original mark without incurring any trademark law liability”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 108 (1987) and Advanced Sports Concepts, Inc. v. Baden Sports, Inc., 29 U.S.P.Q.2d 1227 , 1229, 1993 WL 592529 (S.D.Ohio 1993) (noting that, where a contract for oversized basketballs is silent as to post-agreement sell-off rights, “trademark…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dream Dealers Music v. Parker
See Fed.RXiv.P. 14(a); see also United States v. Olavanieta, 812 F.2d 640, 643 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 107 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yelin v. Carvel Corp.
See also United States v. Olavarrieta, 812 F.2d 640, 642-43 (11th Cir.) (holding that under Florida law defendant’s claim against third party for fraud and breach of contract in failing to award . defendant a J.D. degree was independent of plaintiff's suit for repayment of defendant’s student loans), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 107 (1987); Rozelle v. Connecticut Gen.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Davis
See, e.g., United States v. Olavarrieta, 812 F.2d 640, 644 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 107 (1987); United States v. Tilleraas, 709 F.2d 1088 (6th Cir.1983); United States v. Bellard, 674 F.2d 330 (5th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Societe Des Produits Nestle, S.A. v. Casa Helvetia, Inc.
See, e.g., NEC Elecs., Inc. v. Cal Circuit Abco, 810 F.2d 1506 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 108 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pretty Products, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Olavarrieta, 812 F.2d 640, 643 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 107 reh’g denied, 484 U.S. 1082 , 108 S.Ct. 1064 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1026 (1987) ("Rule 14(a) does not allow the defendant to assert a separate and independent claim even though the claim arises out of the same general set of facts as the main claim. [The defendant’s] third party claim alleging breach of contract [against the putative third-party defendant] is a separate and independent action from the plaintiffs action against him.”) (citations omitted); National …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Berk & Berk
See also United States v. Olavarrieta, 812 F.2d 640 (11th *605 Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 107 (1987) (government’s action to recover on student loan default is separate and independent from defendant’s third-party claim against school for breach of contract for failure to award degree).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-127.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: D. Puerto Rico (1) · S.D. Texas (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.