green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Chavers v. State
See Kennard v. State, 531 So.2d 934, 937 , (Ala.1986) (on cross-examination defense counsel asked the arresting police officer if an accomplice had admitted to him that he had committed the robbery and the officer answered “yes.”), cert. denied 484 U.S. 861 , 108 S.Ct. 176 , 98 L.Ed.2d 129 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Calvin Gunn v. Lanson Newsome, Warden
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Gay v. United States, 816 F.2d 614, 615 (11th Cir.) (approving district court order that noted, “Nor has [petitioner] shown that his petition is based on grounds of which he could not have had knowledge by the exercise of reasonable diligence.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 861 , 108 S.Ct. 176 , 98 L.Ed.2d 129 (1987); Allen v. Newsome, 795 F.2d 934, 939 (11th Cir.1986) (affirming district court conclusion that “[i]t does not require legal advice to appreciate the fact that an intentional distortion of a trial transcript, or the deliberate tampering with the evidence, if proven, amount to …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hill
See, e.g., United States v. Hargrove, 929 F.2d at 320-321 (it is not an abuse of discretion to allow testimony by a witness, who has heard prior testimony in violation of a sequestration order, which is offered to rebut, not conform with, the prior testimony). [¶ 7] The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. Bramlet, 820 F.2d 851, 855 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 861 , 108 S.Ct. 175 , 98 L.Ed.2d 129 (1987), succinctly explains why the sequestration rule generally does not require exclusion of the testimony of a rebuttal witness who has heard prior testimony: [Ajpplication …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Linda Sue Bryson, Also Known as Linda Sue Campbell, Also Known as Linda Nolting, Also Known as Karen Nolting, Also Known as Linda Sue Vehlewald, United States of America v. Henrietta Furnish, Also Known as Hank, United States of America v. Ronnie Furnish
See, e.g., United States v. Rogers, 939 F.2d 591, 595 (8th Cir.1991) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 991 , 112 S.Ct. 609 , 116 L.Ed.2d 632 (1991), and United States v. Perlaza, 818 F.2d 1354, 1359 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 861 , 108 S.Ct. 176 , 98 L.Ed.2d 130 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Linda Sue Bryson
See, e.g., United States v. Rogers, 939 F.2d 591, 595 (8th Cir.1991) (per curiam), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 991 , 112 S.Ct. 609 , 116 L.Ed.2d 632 (1991), and United States v. Perlaza, 818 F.2d 1354, 1359 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 861 , 108 S.Ct. 176 , 98 L.Ed.2d 130 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Dobben
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v Bramlet, 820 F2d 851, 855-856 (CA 7, 1987), cert den 484 US 861 (1987) (an opinion regarding criminal responsibility may be based on reports and observations of others under FRE 703); United States v Lawson, 653 F2d 299, 301-302 (CA 7, 1981), cert den 454 US 1150 (1982) (an opinion based in part on reports by others is admissible on an issue of the defendant's sanity); United States v Phillips, 515 F Supp 758, 762-763 (ED Ky, 1981) (an expert's opinion is admissible where based in part on nurses' notes and reports of the institution where the defendant was previously…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Valenciano
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 87-5120.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.