green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Jim R. Housley v. C.D. Dodson Larry Williams Ed Covey Rick Webb J.M. Kelly and Oklahoma Department of Health
See Straub v. Monge, 815 F.2d 1467, 1469-70 (11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 , 108 S.Ct. 336 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Beauchamp
Jackson v. Procunier, 789 F.2d 307, 311 (5th Cir. 1986) _______ _________ (collecting cases); accord Straub v. Monge, 815 F.2d 1467 , ______ ______ _____ 1470 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Beauchamp
Jackson v. Procunier, 789 F.2d 307, 311 (5th Cir. 1986) (collecting cases); accord Straub v. Monge, 815 F.2d 1467, 1470 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert C. Beauchamp v. Paul Murphy, the Superintendent of the Old Colony Correctional Center
(2×)
Recognition of the constitutional right of access to the courts, however, long precedes Bounds, and has from its inception been applied to civil as well as constitutional claims. 58 Jackson v. Procunier, 789 F.2d 307, 311 (5th Cir.1986) (collecting cases); accord Straub v. Monge, 815 F.2d 1467, 1470 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 , 108 S.Ct. 336 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Fillmore v. Ordonez
See Straub v. Monge, 815 F.2d 1467, 1469-70 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 , 108 S.Ct. 336 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987). 29 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Zettlemoyer v. Fulcomer
See Mayberry v. Petsock, 821 F.2d 179, 187 (3d Cir.) (petitioner's vague and general allegations and supporting materials fail to make sufficient showing to justify relief), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 , 108 S.Ct. 336 , 98 L.Ed.2d 362 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zettlemoyer v. Fulcomer
See Mayberry v. Petsock, 821 F.2d 179, 187 (3d Cir.) (petitioner’s vague and general allegations and supporting materials fail to make sufficient showing to justify relief), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 , 108 S.Ct. 336 , 98 L.Ed.2d 362 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Robert Henry Nicolaus, Real-Party-In-Interest
(2×)
As the Supreme Court stated in Harris v. Nelson, 394 U.S. 286 , 89 S.Ct. 1082 , 22 L.Ed.2d 281 (1969), which established the basis for Rule 6: “[I]n appropriate circumstances, a district court, confronted by a petition for habeas corpus which establishes a prima facie case for relief, may use or authorize the use of suitable discovery procedures .... ” Id. at 290 , 89 S.Ct. at 1086 (emphasis added); see also Mayberry v. Petsock, 821 F.2d 179, 185 (3d Cir.) (citation omitted) (“Unless the petition itself passes scrutiny, there would be no basis to require the state to respond to discovery…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andre Stanley Deputy v. Stanley Taylor, Warden, Sussex Correctional Institution
See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts Rule 6(a) (West 1977); see also Mayberry v. Petsock, 821 F.2d 179, 185 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 , 108 S.Ct. 336 , 98 L.Ed.2d 362 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Toussaint v. Daniel McCarthy Joseph Toussaint v. James Rowland, Director, California Department of Corrections Daniel Vasquez Robert Borg
(2×)
See, e.g., Straub v. Monge, 815 F.2d 1467, 1470 (11th Cir.) (the right to meaningful access to the courts applies to a civil forfeiture action against an inmate), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 , 108 S.Ct. 336 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987); Jackson, 789 F.2d at 311 (the right to meaningful access applies to an inmate’s civil suit); Corpus v. Estelle, 551 F.2d 68, 70 (5th Cir.1977) (the right of meaningful access to the courts includes but is not limited to general civil matters like divorce and small civil claims).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Toussaint v. Daniel McCarthy Joseph Toussaint v. James Rowland, Director, California Department of Corrections Daniel Vasquez Robert Borg
(2×)
See, e.g., Straub v. Monge, 815 F.2d 1467, 1470 (11th Cir.) (the right to meaningful access to the courts applies to a civil forfeiture action against an inmate), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 946 , 108 S.Ct. 336 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987); Jackson, 789 F.2d at 311 (the right to meaningful access applies to an inmate's civil suit); Corpus v. Estelle, 551 F.2d 68, 70 (5th Cir.1977) (the right of meaningful access to the courts includes but is not limited to general civil matters like divorce and small civil claims).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Russell
v.
North Carolina
v.
North Carolina
No. 87-5553.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1987.
484 U.S. 946
Published
Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.