green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
“hile the intentional use of a deadly weapon may, in and of itself, give rise to a presumption that a killing was malicious,... this is insufficient to sustain a finding of premeditation and deliberation”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Commonwealth v. Blasioli
But see State v. Zuniga, 320 N.C. 233 , 357 S.E.2d 898 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 359 , 98 L.Ed.2d 384 (1987) (taking of saliva is unintrusive and therefore not a search). 11 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Barton
hile the intentional use of a deadly weapon may, in and of itself, give rise to a presumption that a killing was malicious,... this is insufficient to sustain a finding of premeditation and deliberation
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McNeill
See State v. Zuniga , 320 N.C. 233 , 274-75, 357 S.E.2d 898 , 923-24, cert. denied , 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 359 , 98 L.Ed.2d 384 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Gibson
See Smith v. State, 737 P.2d 1206 (Okla.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 358 , 98 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilkinson
See State v. Zuniga, 320 N.C. 233, 260 , 357 S.E.2d 898, 915 (noting that the “ ‘essence’ of forcible rape is the assault”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Buckner
See State v. Zuniga, 320 N.C. 233, 250 , 357 S.E.2d 898, 910 (holding that it was permissible to ask whether a juror would consider death sentence if juror determined aggravating circumstances outweighed mitigating circumstances), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fleming v. State
See State v. Zuniga, 357 SE2d 898, 920 (N.C.), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 959 (108 SC 359, 98 LE2d 384) (1987); State v. Smith, 857 SW2d 1, 13 (Tenn.) (prohibiting argument), cert. denied,_U. S. _ (114 SC 561, 126 LE2d _) (1993); State v. Johnson, 632 SW2d 542, 548 (Tenn.) (excluding evidence), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 882 (103 SC 183, 74 LE2d 148) (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Hawkins v. State
(4×)
See, Smith v. State, 737 P.2d 1206 (Okl.Cr. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 358 , 98 L.Ed.2d 383 (1988); Banks v. State, 701 P.2d 418 (Okl.Cr. 1985), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1036 , 112 S.Ct. 883 , 116 L.Ed.2d 787 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See Smith v. Oklahoma, 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 358 , 98 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Woodruff v. State
See Smith v. State, 737 P.2d 1206, 1214 (Okl.Cr.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 358 , 98 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
(2×)
See Smith v. Oklahoma, 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 358 , 98 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Laws
See State v. Zuniga, 320 N.C. 233 , 357 S.E.2d 898 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 359 , 98 L.Ed.2d 384 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jones
See also State v. Zuniga, 320 N.C. 233, 250 , 357 S.E.2d 898, 909 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Anthony
In State v. Ludlum, 303 N.C. 666 , 281 S.E.2d 159 (1981), reviewing a first-degree sex offense prosecution, our Supreme Court noted, “[I]n Article 7A prosecutions . . . the gravamen of the sexual offense itself is that it is committed by force and against the will of the victim or upon a victim who because of age or other incapacity is incapable of consenting.” Id. at 673 , 281 S.E.2d at 163 (emphasis added); see also State v. Zuniga, 320 N.C. 233, 260 , 357 S.E.2d 898, 915 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 959 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Battenfield v. State
See also Smith v. State, 737 P.2d 1206, 1215 (Okl.Cr.1987), cert. denied 484 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 358 , 98 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987). 1 C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Polyak
v.
Stack Heller v. Consolidated Rail Corporation Verderber v. Cantello Plumbing Corp. Ball v. White, Warden Brumbaugh v. Brumbaugh Byrd v. Missouri Haddix v. City of Dayton Reiter v. Crosier Brown v. Dyke Haywood v. Massey Witherspoon v. W. R. Grace & Co. Latshaw v. MCA, Inc. Postel v. Texas Water Development Board Quast v. Quast Nakagawa v. Colorado, In re Callanan
v.
Stack Heller v. Consolidated Rail Corporation Verderber v. Cantello Plumbing Corp. Ball v. White, Warden Brumbaugh v. Brumbaugh Byrd v. Missouri Haddix v. City of Dayton Reiter v. Crosier Brown v. Dyke Haywood v. Massey Witherspoon v. W. R. Grace & Co. Latshaw v. MCA, Inc. Postel v. Texas Water Development Board Quast v. Quast Nakagawa v. Colorado, In re Callanan
No. 86-1899; No. 86-1933; No. 86-2071; No. 86-6705; No. 86-6907; No. 86-6941; No. 86-6982; No. 86-7016; No. 86-7020; No. 86-7047; No. 86-7058; No. 86-7119; No. 87-128; No. 87-177; No. 87-5273; No. 87-5435.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1987.
484 U.S. 959
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of North Carolina (1)
ante, p. 801;
ante, p. 824;
ante, p. 831;
et al., ante, p. 832;
ante, p. 834;
ante, p. 872;
ante, p. 837;
ante, p. 839;
ante, p. 839;
ante, p. 840;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 843;
ante, p. 851;
ante, p. 853;
ante, p. 803; and
ante, p. 894. Petitions for rehearing denied.