green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Balew v. State
But cf. Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988) (The proper procedure is to abate the appeal with directions to the trial judge to reduce to writing his/her findings on the disputed issues surrounding the taking of appellant's statement.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Yolanda Terry and Teron Savoy
See United, States v. Parker, 834 F.2d 408 (4th Cir.1987) (noting ambiguity of “what is meant by ‘patently illegal’ activity”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 279 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. State
(2×)
See Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 786 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (“Miranda has since been extended to cover custodial interrogation of one suspected of even a misdemeanor traffic offense.”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988); Alford, 22 S.W.3d at 671-73 (stating same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cagle v. State
See Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (defendant interviewed by caseworker prior to any arrest was not in custody), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Swails v. State
(2×)
The findings required by section 6 of article 38.22 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure “should resolve the disputed fact issues upon which the grounds of error are based.” Sinegal v. State, 582 S.W.2d 135, 137 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1979 ); see Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 783 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cer t. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Stahle v. State
See Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 786-87 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.
See August v. Offices Unlimited, Inc., 981 F.2d 576, 584 (1st Cir.1992) (plaintiff conceded that he was totally disabled at all relevant times and cannot now establish that he was a "qualified handicapped person” and thus cannot make the prima facie case required to prevail under the Massachusetts discrimination statute) and Beauford v. Father Flanagan's Boys’ Home, 831 F.2d 768, 771 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988) (plaintiff admitted that she cannot perform the essential functions of the job in question and that she will be unable to do …
cited
Cited "see"
James C. Budd v. Adt Security Systems, Inc.
See Beauford v. Father Flanagan’s Boys’ Home, 831 F.2d 768 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
James C. Bud v. ADT Security Systems
See Beauford v. Father Flanagan's Boys' Home, 831 F.2d 768 (8th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Aci Investors Protective Association, and Patrick J. Evans, Counsel for Certain Investors for American Capital Investments, Inc. (\Aci\")
See SEC v. American Bd. of Trade, Inc., 830 F.2d 431 , 441 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Castellano v. City of New York
See Beauford v. Father Flanagan’s Boys’ Home, 831 F.2d 768, 771 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988); Garcia-Paz v. Swift Textiles, Inc., 873 F.Supp. 547, 554-55 (D.Kan.1995); Lewis v. Zilog, Inc., 908 F.Supp. 931, 945 (N.D.Ga.1995); Reigel v. Kaiser Found.
discussed
Cited "see"
Morton v. GTE North Inc.
See Beauford v. Father Flanagan’s Boy’s Home, 831 F.2d 768, 771 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988) (finding plaintiff lacked standing under the Rehabilitation Act 8 based on the plaintiffs unequivocal admission to the court that she was unable to perform her job); Parker v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cramer v. State of Florida
See Beauford v. Father Flanagan’s Boys’Home, 831 F.2d 768, 771 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988) (holding that plaintiffs admission that she cannot perform the essential functions of the job in question and that she will be unable to do so in the near future puts plaintiff outside the protection of the Rehabilitation Act).
discussed
Cited "see"
Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc.
See SEC v. American Bd. of Trade, Inc., 830 F.2d 431 , 442-13 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, Economou v. SEC, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988); cf. Ohralik, 436 U.S. at 456 , 98 S.Ct. at 1918-19 ; (7) the impairment on First Amendment rights is tempered because the corrective notice ordered will not specifically name the authors of the misleading communications and it will state that there were both accurate and misleading communications.
cited
Cited "see"
Pottgen v. Missouri State High School Activities Association
See Beauford v. Father Flanagan's Boys' Home, 831 F.2d 768 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Pottgen v. Missouri State High School Activities Ass'n
See Beauford v. Father Flanagan’s Boys’ Home, 831 F.2d 768 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larkins v. CIBA Vision Corp.
See Beauford v. Father Flanagan's Boys’ Home, 831 F.2d 768, 771 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988) (Rehabili *1584 tation Act does not protect employee who is no longer able to do his or her job due to physical and emotional ailments arising out of pressures of work); Stevens v. Stubbs, 576 F.Supp. 1409, 1415 (N.D.Ga.1983) (Rehabilitation Act “does not protect absenteeism or employees who take excessive leave and are unable to perform the prerequisites of their jobs”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reigel v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of North Carolina
See Beauford v. Father Flanagan’s Boys’ Home, 831 F.2d 768, 770-71 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938, 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988). *970 The undersigned finds these authorities persuasive.
cited
Cited "see"
Canaday v. State
See Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Agretti v. Anr Freight System
See SEC v. American Bd. of Trade, 830 F.2d 431 , 443 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Agretti v. ANR Freight System, Inc.
See SEC v. American Bd. of Trade, 830 F.2d 431 , 443 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hart v. State
Meek, 790 S.W.2d at 621 ; see Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 786 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988); Shiflet v. State, 732 S.W.2d 622, 624 (Tex.Crim.App.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Wagner Fur, Inc.
See S.E.C. v. American Board of Trade, Inc., 654 F.Supp. 361, 366 (S.D.N.Y.1987), cer t. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. S. Mohammad Marashi
See United States v. Parker, 834 F.2d 408, 411 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 279 (1978); United States v. Estes, 793 F.2d 465, 468 (2d Cir.1986); United States v. Picciandra, 788 F.2d 39, 43 (1st Cir.) (conspiracy to evade income taxes), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 847 , 107 S.Ct. 166 , 93 L.Ed.2d 104 , rehearing denied, 479 U.S. 978 , 107 S.Ct. 481 , 93 L.Ed.2d 425 (1986); United States v. Keck, 773 F.2d 759, 767 (7th Cir.1985); United States v. Sims, 755 F.2d 1239, 1243 (6th Cir.) (adopting narrower version of exception), ce rt. denied, 473 U.S. 907 , 10…
cited
Cited "see"
Edward Smith, Jr. v. Steve W. Puckett, Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary, Etc.
See Carter v. Lynaugh, 826 F.2d 408, 409 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Amerson-Bey
See United States v. Springer, 831 F.2d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1987) (defendant cannot accept district court’s ruling, which did not foreclose pursuit of *683 point he was pressing, and then argue on appeal that his right to confrontation was violated), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988); United States v. Qualls, 500 F.2d 1238, 1240-41 (8th Cir.) (to preserve issue for review, defendant must object to district court’s ruling that question on cross-examination was improper), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1051 , 95 S.Ct. 628 , 42 L.Ed.2d 646 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Stevenson
See Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 786 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Del Valle Hernandez v. New York City Law Dept. Corp. Counsel
See, e.g., SEC. v. American Board of Trade, Inc., 830 F.2d 431 , 443 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 (1988); Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Lau, 825 F.2d 647, 650 (2d Cir.1987); D'Ippolito v. Cities Service Co., 374 F.2d 643, 648 (2d Cir.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Griffith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See also Beauford v. Father Flanagan's Boys Home, 831 F.2d 768, 770-71 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1116 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988); Cline v. Western Horseman, Inc., 922 F.Supp. 442, 447 (D.Colo.1996); Reiff v. Interim Personnel, Inc., 906 F.Supp. 1280, 1290-91 (D.Minn.1995); Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc., 911 F.Supp. 1351 (D.Kan.1995); Nguyen v. IBP, Inc., 905 F.Supp. 1471 (D.Kan.1995); Cheatwood v. Roanoke Indus., 891 F.Supp. 1528, 1537-38 (N.D.Ala.1995); McNemar v. The Disney Stores, Inc., No. 94-6997, 1995 WL 390051 , at *3-4 (E.D.Pa.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mario Denane Fultz
Id. 6 This court, like every other circuit which had addressed the matter, construed the privilege narrowly in holding that "the marital communications privilege does not apply to communications having to do with present or future crimes in which both spouses are participants." United States v. Marashi, 913 F.2d 724, 730 (9th Cir. 1990); see also United States v. Parker, 834 F.2d 408, 411 (4th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 (1988); United States v. Estes, 793 F.2d 465, 468 (2nd Cir. 1986); United States v. Keck, 773 F.2d 759, 767 (7th Cir. 1985); United States v. Neal, 743 F.2d 1441, 1…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
See also, Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 786 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. State
See also Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 785-86 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Antar
See, e.g., SEC v. American Board of Trade, Inc., 830 F.2d 431 , 438 (2d Cir.1987) (asset freeze), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988); SEC v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc., 458 F.2d 1082, 1105 (2d Cir.1972) (receiver appointed); SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 1301, 1307 (2d Cir.1971) (disgorgement), ce rt. denied, 404 U.S. 1005 , 92 S.Ct. 561 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971); SEC v. Antar, Civ.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lyle Franklin Hervey v. J.L. Sivley Patricia Branoman, Attorney General of the State of California
See, e.g., United States v. Moline, 833 F.2d 190, 192 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 (1988). 1.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Floyd Alvin England, United States of America v. Chris A. Terrell, United States of America v. Myles Curtis, United States of America v. David L. Mosby, United States of America v. Ronnie D. Peacock
See, e.g., United States v. Springer, 831 F.2d 781, 784 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. England
See, e.g., United States v. Springer, 831 F.2d 781, 784 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1117 , 99 L.Ed.2d 277 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kemp v. Peterson
See Vesco, 490 F.2d at 1347 ; see also SEC v. American Bd. of Trade, Inc., 830 F.2d 431 , 438 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kemp v. Peterson
See Vesco, 490 F.2d at 1347 ; see also SEC v. American Bd. of Trade, Inc., 830 F.2d 431 , 438 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 938 , 108 S.Ct. 1118 , 99 L.Ed.2d 278 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beauford
v.
Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
v.
Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
No. 87-6242.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1988.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.