green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vincent Koopman v. Water District No. 1 of Johnson County, Kansas, and Roger Fairbanks
See, e.g., Nephew v. City of Aurora, 830 F.2d 1547 (10th Cir. 1987) (en banc) (holding that even though plaintiffs were awarded nominal damages, attorney’s fees could be awarded where the amount of the fee was reduced because plaintiffs did not succeed on all counts), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 976 , 108 S.Ct. 1269 , 99 L.Ed.2d 481 (1988). 5 It is indisputable that Koopman did not prove actual damages and so under Farrar is not entitled to full reimbursement for attorney’s fees and costs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romberg v. Nichols
In fact, as the City of Riverside plurality also explained, the socially beneficial "deterrent effect [of civil rights suits] is particularly evident in the area of individual police misconduct, where injunctive relief generally is unavailable." Id. at 575 , 106 S.Ct. at 2694 (plurality opinion); see also Nephew v. City of Aurora, 830 F.2d 1547 , 1549 (10th Cir.1987) (en banc) ("vindication [of civil rights] often can include important social benefits that are not reflected in nominal damages"), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 976 , 108 S.Ct. 1269 , 99 L.Ed.2d 481 (1988). 30 The dispositive inquiry for…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romberg v. Nichols
In fact, as the City of Riverside plurality also explained, the socially beneficial "deterrent effect [of civil rights suits] is particularly evident in the area of individual police misconduct, where injunctive relief generally is unavailable." Id. at 575 , 106 S.Ct. at 2694 (plurality opinion); see also Nephew v. City of Aurora, 830 F.2d 1547 , 1549 (10th Cir.1987) (en banc) ("vindication [of civil rights] often can include important social benefits that are not reflected in nominal damages"), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 976 , 108 S.Ct. 1269 , 99 L.Ed.2d 481 (1988). 30 The dispositive inquiry for…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romberg v. Nichols
In fact, as the City of Riverside plurality also explained, the socially beneficial “deterrent effect [of civil rights suits] is particularly evident in the area of individual police misconduct, where injunctive relief generally is unavailable.” Id. at 575 , 106 S.Ct. at 2694 (plurality opinion); see also Nephew v. City of Aurora, 830 F.2d 1547, 1549 (10th Cir.1987) (en banc) (“vindication [of civil rights] often can include important social benefits that are not reflected in nominal damages”), ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 976 , 108 S.Ct. 1269 , 99 L.Ed.2d 481 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romberg v. Nichols
In fact, as the City of Riverside plurality also explained, the socially beneficial “deterrent effect [of civil rights suits] is particularly evident in the area of individual police misconduct, where injunctive relief generally is unavailable.” Id. at 575 , 106 S.Ct. at 2694 (plurality opinion); see also Nephew v. City of Aurora, 830 F.2d 1547, 1549 (10th Cir.1987) (en banc) (“vindication [of civil rights] often can include important social benefits that are not reflected in nominal damages”), ce rt. denied, 485 U.S. 976 , 108 S.Ct. 1269 , 99 L.Ed.2d 481 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
One 1984 Lincoln Mark VII Two-Door
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-1092.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1988.
485 U.S. 976
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.