green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Sherman Simon, Jr., Individually and as Next Friend of His Minor Children, Peter Darnell Simon and Keenan Simon, Etc. v. United States
But cf. Taylor v. United States, 821 F.2d 1428, 1433 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 992 , 108 S.Ct. 1300 , 99 L.Ed.2d 510 (1988) (California statutory limitation on noneconomic damages in actions based on professional negligence “is a limitation of damages rather than an affirmative defense”). 2 *1157 Our precedent in Ingraham regarding the Texas statute compels the conclusion that the Louisiana limitation is also an affirmative defense because it is an “avoidance” within the meaning of Rule 8(c).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Westfarm Associates Limited Partnership v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission
And in Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port Authority, 520 F.2d 810, 813 (1975), the First Circuit held that a statutory limitation on liability is an affirmative defense under Rule 8(c). 102 Taylor II, 485 U.S. at 992-93, 108 S.Ct. at 1301 (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Westfarm Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission
Taylor II, 485 U.S. at 992-93, 108 S.Ct. at 1301 (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Racher v. Westlake Nursing Home Ltd. Partnership
(2×)
Compare Jakobsen v. Mass. Port Auth., 520 F.2d 810, 813 (1st Cir. 1975) (holding that a state damage cap was an affirmative defense under Rule 8), and Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1157 (5th Cir. 1990) (same), with Taylor v. United States, 821 F.2d 1428, 1432-33 (9th Cir. 1987), cert denied, 485 U.S. 992 , 108 S.Ct. 1300 , 99 L.Ed.2d 510 (1988) (looking to substantive state law and concluding that a state statute’s damage cap was a “limitation of damages” rather than an affirmative defense); see also Taylor v. United States, 485 U.S. 992 , 992-93, 108 S.Ct. 1300 , 99 L.Ed.2d 510…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cobalt Multifamily Investors I, LLC v. Arden
See, e.g., Taylor v. United States, 485 U.S. 992 , 992, 108 S.Ct. 1300 , 99 L.Ed.2d 510 (1988) (“Any matter ‘constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense’ ... must be pleaded in a timely manner or it is deemed to be waived”); Butler v. Catinella, 58 A.D.3d 145, 150 , 868 N.Y.S.2d 101, 106 (2d Dep’t 2008) (“Affirmative defenses ... as a general rule, would be deemed waived if not raised in the pleadings”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ward
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-6563.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1988.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.