green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
8.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Donald Lynn Shetterly
(2×)
United States v. Geissler, 731 F.Supp. 93, 99-100 (E.D.N.Y.1990); United States v. Moller-Butcher, 560 F.Supp. 550, 553 (D.C.Mass.1983); but see United States v. Gregg, 829 F.2d 1430, 1437 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1994 , 100 L.Ed.2d 226 (1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Patrick Archer Const., Inc.
experts are not to state opinions of law.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States Fire Insurance v. United Limousine Service, Inc.
the focus of section 1962(c) is on the individual patterns of racketeering engaged in by a defendant, rather than the collective activities of the members of the enterprise, which are proscribed by section 1962(d).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
De Falco v. Bernas
the focus of section 1962(c) is on the individual patterns of racketeering engaged in by a defendant, rather than the collective activities of the members of the enterprise, which are proscribed by section 1962(d).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
De Falco v. Bernas
the focus of section 1962(c) is on the individual patterns of racketeering engaged in by a defendant, rather than the collective activities of the members of the enterprise, which are proscribed by section 1962(d).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dicenzo
See United States v. Persico, 832 F.2d 705, 714 (2d Cir. 1987) (noting that “[t]he focus of [S]ection 1962(c) is on the individual patterns of racketeering engaged in by a defendant”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re WellPoint, Inc. Out-of-Network \UCR\" Rates Litigation"
See United States v. Persico, 832 F.2d 705 , 714 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1995 , 100 L.Ed.2d 227 (1988); Keel v. Schwarzenegger, CV 08-7591 RMT (VBK), 2009 WL 1444644 , at *6 (C.D.Cal.
discussed
Cited "see"
New York v. Julius Nasso Concrete Corp.
See United States v. Persico, 620 F.Supp. 836 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 774 F.2d 30 (2d Cir.1985); see United States v. Persico, 646 F.Supp. 752 (S.D.N.Y.1986), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 832 F.2d 705 (2d Cir.1987), cert denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1995 , 100 L.Ed.2d 227 (1988); see also United States v. Salerno, 868 F.2d 524 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 907 , 493 U.S. 811 , 109 S.Ct. 3192 , 110 S.Ct. 56 , 105 L.Ed.2d 700 , 107 L.Ed.2d 24 (1989) ("Salerno I"). .
discussed
Cited "see"
State of New York v. Julius Nasso Concrete Corp.
Notes: * The Honorable Constance Baker Motley, Senior United States District Judge of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. 1 See United States v. Persico, 620 F. Supp. 836 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 774 F.2d 30 (2d Cir. 1985); see United States v. Persico, 646 F. Supp. 752 (S.D.N.Y. 1986), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 832 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1987), cert denied, 486 U.S. 1022 (1988); see also United States v. Salerno, 868 F.2d 524 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 907 , 493 U.S. 811 ("Salerno I"). 2 This court reversed Auletta's conviction, see United States v. Salerno, 937 F.…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gigante
See United States v. Pérsico, 832 F.2d 705, 714 (2d Cir.1987), cert, denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1995 , 100 L.Ed.2d 227 (1988).
examined
Cited "see"
Jose Flores v. Reyes Rios and Gibsonburg Canning Company
(4×)
See Bueno v. Mattner, 829 F.2d 1380, 1382 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1994 , 100 L.Ed.2d 226 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Escobar v. Baker
(2×)
See Bueno v. Mattner, 829 F.2d 1380, 1384 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1994 , 100 L.Ed.2d 226 (1988) (defendants could not escape liability under the AWPA by arguing that they had never explicitly authorized others to perform farm labor contracting activities on their behalf when they accepted the benefit of migrant labor brought to their farm through the efforts of other workers).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stewart v. Everett
(2×)
See Bueno v. Mattner, 829 F.2d 1380 , 1385 n. 4 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1994 , 100 L.Ed.2d 226 (1988); Saintida v. Tyre, 783 F.Supp. 1368, 1374 (S.D.Fla.1992) (citing Rivera and other cases interpreting the FLCRA as authority for the standard under the AWPA); Aviles v. Kunkle, 765 F.Supp. 358, 365 (S.D.Tex.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Keith L. Prescott v. United States
See Hyrdrogen Technology Corp. v. United States, 831 F.2d 1155 , 1162 n. 6 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1995 , 100 L.Ed.2d 227 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Orwick v. Fox
See Orion Corp. v. State, 109 Wn.2d 621 , 747 P.2d 1062 (1987) (equity and good conscience require that plaintiff be permitted to continue action against County and State without joinder of federal government, a necessary party, where plaintiff could not sue all defendants in one jurisdiction), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Keith L. Prescott v. United States
See Hydrogen Technology Corp. v. United States, 831 F.2d 1155 , 1162 n. 6 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Gonsalves v. United States
See Hydrogen Technology Corp. v. United States, 831 F.2d 1155, 1160 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1995 , 100 L.Ed.2d 227 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles F. Collins (87-1283), Francis R. Fitzsimmons (87-1284/2038), Sol Schwartz (87-1285), Roger Towne (87-1286/2072)
See United States v. Persico, 832 F.2d 705 (2d Cir.1987) (conspiracy convictions upheld even though the predicate acts of these defendants occurred more than five years prior to the date of the indictment), cert. denied, Russo v. United States, 486 U.S. 1022 (1988). 116 The differing positions are due in part to differing characterizations of the effect of Fed.R.Crim.P. 34.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Santana
The Government, however, may lose its right to raise factual issues of this sort before this Court when it has made contrary assertions in the courts below, when it has acquiesced in contrary findings by those courts, or when it has failed to raise such questions in a timely fashion during the litigation.” Id. at 209 (emphasis added); accord United States v. Persico, 832 F.2d 705 , 714-15 n.2 (2d Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 (1988); United States v. Thompson, 710 F.2d 1500, 1503-04 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 (1984); United States v. Sanchez, 689 F.2d 508 , 509 n…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ortiz De Zevallos
(2×)
See United States v. Gregg, 829 F.2d 1430, 1436 (8th Cir.1987) (evidence that defendant had expertise in area of Arms Export Control Act, i.e., that “he gave lectures and published newsletters on the subject,” is circumstantial evidence of actual knowledge of the regulations), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1994 , 100 L.Ed.2d 226 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Caldwell v. Cablevision Systems Corp.
Accordingly, for example, a witness who has been promised a favorable plea bargain in exchange for his or her truthful testimony is competent to testify, even though the promise of a reduced sentence undoubtedly creates a motive to fabricate (see People v Jackson, 74 NY2d 787, 789-790 [1989]; see also United States v Persico, 832 F2d 705, 717 [1987] [paid informant is competent to testify], cert denied 486 US 1022 [1988]; United States v Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F2d 310, 315 [1987] [same], cert denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eric B. Reinholz Margaret E. Chevalier
(2×)
United States v. Hohn, 8 F.3d 1301 (8th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Gregg, 829 F.2d 1430 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1994 , 100 L.Ed.2d 226 (1988); United States v. Biondich, 652 F.2d 743 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 527 , 70 L.Ed.2d 395 (1981); United States v. Sumpter, 669 F.2d 1215 (8th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eric Reinholz
United States v. Hohn, 8 F.3d 1301 (8th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Gregg, 829 F.2d 1430 (8th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 (1988); United States v. Biondich, 652 F.2d 743 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 975 (1981); United States v. Sumpter, 669 F.2d 1215 (8th Cir. 1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gigante
See, e.g., United States v. Persico, 832 F.2d 705, 714 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1995 , 100 L.Ed.2d 227 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hodas v. Sherburne, Powers & Needham, P.C.
Finally, Hodas suggests that his pleading of RICO conspiracy would circumvent the defendants’ statute-of-limitations argument because “[t]he statute of limitations for a RICO conspiracy does not begin to run until the objectives of the conspiracy have been either achieved or abandoned.” United States v. Eisen, 974 F.2d 246, 264 (2d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1029 , 113 S.Ct. 1840 , 123 L.Ed.2d 467 (1993); see also United States v. Persico, 832 F.2d 705, 713 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1995 , 100 L.Ed.2d 227 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Marvin Lovejoy v. Donald Owens
See also Bueno v. Mattner, 829 F.2d 1380, 1384 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 (1988). 15 Lovejoy did not respond to the requests pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 36(a).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Health Care Review Inc. v. Shalala
(2×)
See Pennsylvania Peer Review Organization, 50 B.R. at 644 ; see also Kwoun v. Southeast Missouri Professional Standards Review Organization, 811 F.2d 401 , 409 n. 14 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1994 , 100 L.Ed.2d 226 (1988) (noting that the Secretary has the power to terminate a contract with any PRO and that “[s]uch a termination is not subject to judicial review”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vytautus Vebeliunas, Also Known as Vv
The statue of limitations did not bar the bringing of this action. 968 F.2d at 790 ; see also United States v. Persico, 832 F.2d 705, 713 (2d Cir.1987) ("The limitations period is measured from h~e point at which the crime is complete." (citing Toussie, 397 U.S. at 115 , 90 S.Ct. at 860 )), certs. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1995 , 1996, 100 L.Ed.2d 227 , 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 532 , 102 L.Ed.2d 564 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Emond v. Durfee, 91-0237 (1996)
The appellants retain each of their fundamental rights in the property and thus the economic impact of the government action cannot be said to be "astounding." See EJ Inc. v. Redevelopment Authority of Woonsocket, 122 R.I. 288 , 291, 405 A.2d 1187 , 1189 (1979) (right to compensation for taking confined to case involving deprivation of one or more of the fundamental property rights); see also Orion Corp. v. State, 747 P.2d 1062 , 1085 (Wash. 1987) (even if state denied landowner right to make present, reasonably profitable use of property, other uses of property remained intact so as to minima…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Alberta Anderson v. United States
See also Bueno v. Mattner, 829 F.2d 1380, 1384 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rivett v. City of Tacoma
See Clerk’s Papers, at 55-57. 6 Clerk’s Papers, at 5-7. 7 Supplemental Clerk’s Papers, at 7-8. 8 Clerk’s Papers, at 8-9. 9 The two orders are substantially similar except that (1) the order dated January 10, 1992 was not signed by Ms. Helen Rivett’s representative, but the order dated January 24,1992 was; and (2) the order dated January 10,1992 did not dismiss the City’s cross-claim with prejudice, but the order dated January 24, 1992 did. 10 Court’s oral ruling, Partial Verbatim Report of Proceedings, at 2-3; order granting defendant Gundermanns’ motion for summary judgment; C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gambino
In determining whether there is strong reason to believe that the impaneling of an anonymous jury is necessary, courts have often considered the following factors: “(1) the seriousness of the offenses charged, including whether the defendants are alleged to have engaged in dangerous and unscrupulous conduct in the context of a large-scale criminal organization and whether the defendants have access to means to harm jurors; (2) whether the defendants have engaged in past attempts to interfere with the workings of the judicial process, such as by jury tampering or attempts to evade prosecution…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arnold I. Mandel Rona K. Mandel
(4×)
United States v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., 864 F.2d 1467, 1473 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 51 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989); see also United States v. Gregg, 829 F.2d 1430, 1437 (8th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1994 , 100 L.Ed.2d 226 (1988) (policy factors of 50 U.S.C.App. §§ 2401 and 2402 for Secretary to consider in imposing export restrictions are not elements of criminal offense under EAA); Moller-Butcher, 560 F.Supp. at 552-53 (whether item would make significant contribution to military potential of another country not element of offense un…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Presbytery of Seattle v. King County
See, e.g., Great N. Ry. v. State, 102 Wash. 348 , 173 P. 40 (1918), wherein the government's blasting caused debris to fall on and damage plaintiff's railroad tracks. 11 Orion Corp. v. State, 109 Wn.2d 621 , 747 P.2d 1062 (1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022 , 100 L.
Massachusetts
v.
Oakes
v.
Oakes
No. 87-1651.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1988.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari granted.