green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Massey v. State
See Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 583 , 530 A.2d 743 (1987), vacated, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 , aff'd in part and vacated on other grounds, 314 Md.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. State
Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 227 , 98 S.Ct. 458 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977); see Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 577 , 530 A.2d 743 (1987), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryant v. State
See Maziarz v. State, 302 Md. 1, 6 , 485 A.2d 245, 247 (1984) (finding that the standard applied by the trial court, that “death is said to be ‘mandated’ unless the mitigating circumstances are ‘overwhelming’ ... grossly distorts the statute to prejudice the accused”). *602 Bryant further insists that the court’s use of the 51% figure in weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors represents a kind of mechanistic counting criticized by this Court in Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 600-01 , 530 A.2d 743, 758-59 (1987), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050, 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. State
See Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 577 , *125 530 A.2d 743 , vacated and remanded on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988); Brocking-ton v. State, 85 Md.App. 165, 172 , 582 A.2d 568 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
Closing argument “ ‘is a robust forensic forum wherein its practitioners are afforded a wide range of expression.’ ” Clarke v. State, 97 Md.App. 425, 431 , 630 A.2d 252 (1993)(quoting Davis v. State, 93 Md.App. 89, 124 , 611 A.2d 1008 (1992), aff'd, 333 Md. 27 , 633 A.2d 867 (1993)); see Degren v. State, 352 Md. 400, 429 , 722 A.2d 887 (1999) (stating that “attorneys are afforded great leeway in presenting closing arguments to the jury.”) “ ‘The prosecutor is allowed liberal freedom of speech and may make any comment that is warranted by the evidence or inferences reasonably dr…
discussed
Cited "see"
McGrier v. State
Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); accord, Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 577 , 530 A.2d 743 (1987), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Braun v. State
See Hayes v. State, 738 P.2d 533, 538 (Okl.Cr.1987), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988) (of 27 news articles presented, all were published one and one-half years before trial).
cited
Cited "see"
Brooks v. State
See Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 589-90 , 530 A.2d 743 (1987), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valdez v. State
See Hayes v. State, 738 P.2d 533, 538-39 (Okl.Cr.1987) vacated on other grounds in Hayes v. Oklahoma, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988) (acknowledging the photograph's lack of probative value, this Court went on to conclude that its admission was harmless); Boutwell v. State, 659 P.2d at 326 ("[Cjonsider-ing ... the overwhelming evidence against the accused, these [photographs of the victim taken while alive] would not have had the tendency to unduly prejudice the jury.”). . 21 O.S.1981, § 701.12(4) ("The murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel....”). .
cited
Cited "see"
White v. State
See Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 589 , 530 A.2d 743 (1987), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Henry v. State
See Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 582 , 530 A.2d 743, 750 (1987), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Staggs v. State
See Hayes v. State, 738 P.2d 533, 538-39 (Okl.Cr.1987), vacated on other grounds 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988); Whittmore v. State, 742 P.2d 1154, 1156 (Okl.Cr.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oladipupo v. Warden
See also Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 589 (1987), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , on remand, 314 Md. 111 (1988)) (“Where competent evidence of a matter is received, no prejudice is sustained where other objected to evidence of the same matter is also received.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel v. State
See, e.g., Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 588 , 530 A.2d 743 (1987), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 , sentence vacated on remand on other grounds, 314 Md. 111 , 549 A.2d 17 (1988) (A detective’s testimony was not inadmissible hearsay because it was not offered as an assertion of truth; rather, the testimony “concerning his initial interview with [the witness] was offered to explain how it came to be that police concluded [the defendant] was a suspect and included his picture among those in the photo array later shown to [the witness]�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klauenberg v. State
(2×)
See Tichnell v. State, 287 Md. 695, 716 , 415 A.2d 830, 841 (1980) (“[I]t is not reversible error when evidence, claimed to be inadmissible, is later admitted without objection.”); see also Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 588-89 , 530 A.2d 743, 753 (1987) (holding that no prejudice occurred when certain evidence was admitted at one point without objection and at another point over an objection), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988); Clark v. State, 97 Md.App. 381, 394-95 , 629 A.2d 1322, 1329 (1993) (holding that even though the defense objected to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. State
(2×)
See also Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 582-83 , 530 A.2d 743 (1987), vacated, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 , aff'd in part and vacated on other grounds, 314 Md. 111 , 549 A.2d 17 (1988); Chief, Montgomery County Dep't of Police v. Jacocks, 50 Md.App. 132, 139 , 436 A.2d 930 (1981) (noting that, by judicial decision, Maryland courts have adopted the underlying principles in Jencks v. United States ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. State
See also Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569, 588-89 , 530 A.2d 743 (1987), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988) (holding that no prejudice was sustained where certain evidence was admitted at one point without objection and admitted at another point over objection); Kronovet v. Lipchin, 288 Md. 30, 51-52 , 415 A.2d 1096 (1980); Tichnell v. State, 287 Md. 695, 715-16 , 415 A.2d 830 (1980), aff'd on other grounds, 297 Md. 432 , 468 A.2d 1 (1983); Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 504-07 , 403 A.2d 1221 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Engberg v. Meyer
(2×)
See also Stout v. Oklahoma, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2814 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988), remanded in light of Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. 356 , 108 S.Ct. 1853 , 100 L.Ed.2d 372 (1988); Hayes v. Oklahoma, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988), case below, Hayes v. State, 738 P.2d 533 (Okl.Cr. 1987), remanded in light of Maynard, 108 S.Ct. 1853 ; Jones v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 , (1988), case below, Jones v. State, 310 Md. 569 , 530 A.2d 743 (1987), remanded in light of Mills, 108 S.Ct. 1860 ; Woratzeck v. Ricketts, 486 U.S. 1051 , 108 S.Ct. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lafevers v. State
(2×)
See also Hayes v. State, 738 P.2d 533 (Okl.Cr. 1987), vacated 486 U.S. 1050 , 108 S.Ct. 2815 , 100 L.Ed.2d 916 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Watson v. Symons Corp.
See also — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2813 -14, 100 L.Ed.2d 914 (1988) for a list of circuit court rulings on the preemptive effect of § 301 which the Supreme Court vacated after deciding Lingle.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeSoto
v.
Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.
v.
Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.
No. 87-964.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 13, 1988.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef Inc., ante, p. 399.