green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Chloe Z Fishing Co. v. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd.
See Teamsters Local 315 v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 856 F.2d 1307, 1314 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Mitsubishi Motors Corp., 473 U.S. at 631 , 105 S.Ct. 3346 . 18 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Steenhouse v. Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc.
See Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 855 F.2d 888 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989)(damages awarded to entertainer for symphony’s cancellation of performance causing her not to receive job offers she otherwise would have received; claim distinguished from claim for damage to reputation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Pictures Television v. Krypton Broadcasting Of Birmingham, Inc.
"An agreement to make in the future such a contract as may be agreed upon at a later time amounts to nothing, is not binding, and cannot be made the basis of a cause of action." Forgeron Inc. v. Hansen, 149 Cal.App.2d 352 , 308 P.2d 406, 411 (1957) (quoting 12 Cal.Jur.2d, Contracts, § 111); accord Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 229 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 870, 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Pictures Television v. Krypton Broadcasting of Birmingham, Inc.
“An agreement to make in the future such a contract as may be agreed upon at a later time amounts to nothing, is not binding, and cannot be made the basis of a cause of action.” Forgeron Inc. v. Hansen, 149 Cal.App.2d 352 , 308 P.2d 406, 411 (1957) (quoting 12 Cal.Jur.2d, Contracts, § 111); accord Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal. App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 229 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 870, 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stearns & Co. v. Daisy System Corp. (In re Daisy System Corp.)
See Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38, 55-56 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217 (1988)(holding that reliance that a loan would be approved based upon a failure to disclose that it might be denied was unreasonable where plaintiff knew that loans were subject to approval by the loan officer’s superiors), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 870, 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7123, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,695 in Re Daisy Systems Corporation and Daisy/cadnetix, Inc. Bear Stearns and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Bruce M. Holland Burton J. McMurtry Carl D. Carman F. Gibson Meyers Lutz P. Henckels, Creditors-Appellees v. Daisy Systems Corp., Debtor, and Jack S. Kenney, in His Capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee for Daisy Systems Corporation and Daisy/cadnetix, Inc., Trustee-Appellant
See Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38, 55-56 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217 (1988)(holding that reliance that a loan would be approved based upon a failure to disclose that it might be denied was unreasonable where plaintiff knew that loans were subject to approval by the loan officer's superiors), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 870, 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989). 48 We agree.
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Land Co. Sierra Palm Partners West Lanes Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation
See Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 234 (1988) (“The tort of intentional interference with economic advantage affords a remedy for wrongful interference with an economic relationship by a third party”) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989). 8 Thus, we conclude that Brunswick has the better argument on this issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Schneider v. Trw, Inc.
See Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 67-68 & n. 21, 248 Cal.Rptr. 217 , 235 & n. 21 (1988) ("heartless and insensitive remarks" not directly communicated to plaintiff "merit opprobrium [but] do not qualify as the kind of 'outrageous' conduct necessary to support an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 870 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); cf. Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of America, 38 Cal.3d 892, 909 , 701 P.2d 826, 838 , 215 Cal.Rptr. 679, 691 (1985) (public ridicule using profanity supports outrageous conduct finding); Alcorn v. An…
discussed
Cited "see"
Okura & Co. (America), Inc. v. Careau Group
See Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38, 60-61 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 230 (1988) (the absence of evidence of proximate causation of damages, where a necessary element of the claim, is fatal to that claim), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 870 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Westminster Bank, U.S.A. v. Ross
Sirinakis v. Colonial Bank, 600 F.Supp. 946 , 953 n. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1984); accord Kruse v. Bank of America N.T. & S.A, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217 (1st Dist.1988), ce rt. denied sub nom, Duck v. Bank of America, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869, 870 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schneider v. TRW, Inc.
See Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 67-68 & n. 21, 248 Cal.Rptr. 217 , 235 & n. 21 (1988) (“heartless and insensitive remarks” not directly communicated to plaintiff “merit opprobrium [but] do not qualify as the kind of ‘outrageous’ conduct necessary to support an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 870 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); cf. Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of America, 38 Cal.3d 892, 909 , 701 P.2d 826, 838 , 215 Cal.Rptr. 679, 691 (1985) (public ridicule using profanity supports outrageous conduct finding); …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atari Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Ernst & Whinney, a Partnership Goldman Sachs, a Partnership Wilfred Schwartz, Keith Powell Merrill Lyons Michael A. Pastore Hyman Hershow Marc Laulhere Jack W. Minor, Individuals, Atari Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Ernst & Whinney, a Partnership Goldman Sachs, a Partnership, and Wilfred Schwartz, Keith Powell Merrill Lyons Michael A. Pastore Hyman Hershow Marc Laulhere Jack W. Minor, Individuals
See, e.g., Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 226 (1988) (fraudulent misrepresentation), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Christiansen v. Roddy, 186 Cal.App.3d 780 , 231 Cal.Rptr. 72, 77 (1986) (negligent misrepresentation); International Mortgage Co. v. John P. Butler Accountancy Corp., 177 Cal.App.3d 806 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 218, 225-226 (1986) (professional malpractice).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atari Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Ernst & Whinney, a Partnership Goldman Sachs, a Partnership Wilfred Schwartz Keith Powell Merrill Lyons Michael A. Pastore Hyman Hershow Marc Laulhere Jack W. Minor, Individuals, Atari Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Ernst & Whinney, a Partnership Goldman Sachs, a Partnership, and Wilfred Schwartz Keith Powell Merrill Lyons Michael A. Pastore Hyman Hershow Marc Laulhere Jack W. Minor, Individuals
See, e.g., Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 226 (1988) (fraudulent misrepresentation), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Christiansen v. Roddy, 186 Cal.App.3d 780 , 231 Cal.Rptr. 72, 77 (1986) (negligent misrepresentation); International Mortgage Co. v. John P. Butler Accountancy Corp., 177 Cal.App.3d 806 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 218, 225-226 (1986) (professional malpractice).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atari Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney
See, e.g., Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 226 (1988) (fraudulent misrepresentation), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Christiansen v. Roddy, 186 Cal.App.3d 780 , 231 Cal.Rptr. 72, 77 (1986) (negligent misrepresentation); International Mortgage Co. v. John P. Butler Accountancy Corp., 177 Cal.App.3d 806 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 218, 225-226 (1986) (professional malpractice).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atari Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney
See, e.g., Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 226 (1988) (fraudulent misrepresentation), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Christiansen v. Roddy, 186 Cal.App.3d 780 , 231 Cal.Rptr. 72, 77 (1986) (negligent misrepresentation); International Mortgage Co. v. John P. Butler Accountancy Corp., 177 Cal.App.3d 806 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 218, 225-226 (1986) (professional malpractice).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hendricks & Associates, Inc. v. Daewoo Corporation
See also Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 855 F.2d 888, 893 (1st Cir.1988) (citing Hetherington & Sons, 210 Mass, at 21), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clark
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-5598.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1989.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.