green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Presley v. Jackson Municipal Airport Authority
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Stauber v. Cline, 837 F.2d 395, 396 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988) (citing 32 U.S.C. §§ 709 (b), 709(e)(1) & (2)). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bobby Gene Richardson
See United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39, 46-47 (1st Cir.1987)(consecutive sentences under § 841(a)(1) for possession of heroin and cocaine with intent to distribute), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988); United States v. DeJesus, 806 F.2d 31, 35-37 (2d Cir.1986)(same), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1090 , 107 S.Ct. 1299 , 94 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987); United States v. Grandison, 783 F.2d 1152, 1155-56 (4th Cir.)(same), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 845 , 107 S.Ct. 160 , 93 L.Ed.2d 99 (1986); United States v. Davis, 656 F.2d 153, 156-60 (5th Cir.1981)(consecutive sentences un…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ross v. United States Postal Service
An agency acts intentionally or willfully "either by committing the act without grounds for believing it to be lawful, or flagrantly disregarding others' rights under the [Privacy] Act." Wilborn v. Department of Health & Human Servs., 49 F.3d 597, 602 (9th Cir.1995) (quotations and citation omitted); see Andrews v. Veterans Admin., 838 F.2d 418 , 425 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 56 , 102 L.Ed.2d 35 (1988). 19 We conclude that each of the intra-USPS disclosures had some basis in the "need to know" exception, § 552a(b)(1).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mount v. United States Postal Service
An agency acts intentionally or willfully “either by committing the act without grounds for believing it to be lawful, or flagrantly disregarding others’ rights under the [Privacy] Act.” Wilborn v. Department of Health & Human Servs., 49 F.3d 597, 602 (9th Cir.1995) (quotations and citation omitted); see Andrews v. Veterans Admin., 838 F.2d 418 , 425 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 56 , 102 L.Ed.2d 35 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patricia Ann Thomas Jackson v. Tommy Herring, Cross-Appellee
See Poole v. United States, 832 F.2d 561, 565 (11th Cir.1987) (counsel not ineffective for failing to raise Batson-type objection before Batson was decided, because Batson standard was substantial break with Swain), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 54 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gonzalez Abreau v. Banco Central
See United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39, 44 (1st Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988); see also 18 Wright & Miller, supra, § 4451, at 430 (arguing that “[preclusion is fair so long as the relationship between the nonparty and a party was such that the nonparty had the same practical opportunity to control the course of the proceedings that would be available to a party”); cf. Montana, 440 U.S. at 154 , 99 S.Ct. at 974 (finding issue preclusion appropriate “when nonparties assume control over litigation in which they have a direct financi…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Xiarhos
See United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39, 43-44 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry W. Hall
See United States v. Orellanes, 809 F.2d 1526, 1528-29 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wiley v. Puckett
See Poole v. United States, 832 F.2d 561, 565 (11th Cir. 1987) (attorney not ineffective for failing to raise Batson claim before decision because case was a clear break with precedent), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 (1988); cf. Government of Virgin Islands v. Forte, 865 F.2d 59, 62-63 (3d Cir. 1989) (counsel's failure to raise Batson claim was ineffective only because defendant asked him to object in light of fact that Batson was pending).
discussed
Cited "see"
William L. Wiley v. Steve W. Puckett, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, and Mike Moore, Attorney General
See Poole v. United States, 832 F.2d 561, 565 (11th Cir.1987) (attorney not ineffective for failing to raise Batson claim before decision because case was a clear break with precedent), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 54 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988); cf. Government of Virgin Islands v. Forte, 865 F.2d 59, 62-63 (3d Cir.1989) (counsel’s failure to raise Batson claim was ineffective only because defendant asked him to object in light of fact that Batson was pending).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wiley v. Puckett
See Poole v. United States, 832 F.2d 561, 565 (11th Cir. 1987) (attorney not ineffective for failing to raise Batson claim before decision because case was a clear break with precedent), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 (1988); cf. Government of Virgin Islands v. Forte, 865 F.2d 59, 62-63 (3d Cir. 1989) (counsel's failure to raise Batson claim was ineffective only because defendant asked him to object in light of fact that Batson was pending).
cited
Cited "see"
Hermanson v. State
See Commonwealth v. Barnhart, 345 Pa.Super. 10 , 497 A.2d 616 (1985), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 34 (1988); Hall v. State, 493 N.E.2d 433 (Ind. 1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Boston Housing Authority v. Guirola
See United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39, 43 (1st Cir. 1987), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 817 (1988); Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew, 511 F.2d 710, 719 (5th Cir.), cert, denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Milliken
See United States v. Orellanes, 809 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Felipe Bonilla-Romero v. United States
See United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of New England v. BWL, INC.
See In re Ellingsen MacLean Oil Co., 834 F.2d 599, 604-05 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988); Adams Apple, 829 F.2d 1484 , 1487-89 & n. 6 (9th Cir.1987); In re Texaco, Inc., 92 B.R. at 44 n. 10, 51-52; In re Graphic Arts Lithographers, Inc., 71 B.R. 774, 776-77 (Bankr. 9th Cir. BAP 1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thermacote Welco Co. v. United States
See, e.g., Omni U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 11 CIT 480 , 483, 663 F.Supp. 1130, 1133 (1987), aff'd, 840 F.2d 912 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 56 , 102 L.Ed.2d 34 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Green
See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; see also Poole v. United States, 832 F.2d 561, 564 (11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 54 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shawn Peterson
See also United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39, 43 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988) (state court result will bind federal prosecutors only if they “substantially controlled]” the state action or were “virtually represented]” by the state prosecutor).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nathanson v. FDIC
Cir. 1987) (internal quotations omitted); see, e.g., ___ ____ Andrews v. Veterans Admin., 838 F.2d 418 , 424-25 (10th Cir.) _______ ________________ (reviewing caselaw), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 (1988). ____________ Even with the record construed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, there is nothing to suggest that Moore acted in any such fashion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nathanson v. FDIC
In typical formulations, courts have held that an agency violates this standard by "committing the act without grounds for believing it to be lawful, or by flagrantly disregarding others' rights under the Act," Albright v. United States, 732 F.2d 181, 189 (D.C.Cir.1984), or by committing a violation "so patently egregious and unlawful that anyone undertaking the conduct should have known it unlawful," Laningham v. United States Navy, 813 F.2d 1236, 1242 (D.C.Cir.1987) (internal quotations omitted); see, e.g., Andrews v. Veterans Admin., 838 F.2d 418 , 424-25 (10th Cir.) (reviewing caselaw), ce…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hassenfratz v. Garner
See, e.g., Stauber v. Cline, 837 F.2d 395, 399 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988); Illinois Nat’l Guard v. FLRA, 854 F.2d 1396 , 1398 (D.C.Cir.1988); American Fed’n, 730 F.2d at 1545-46; New Jersey Air Nat’l Guard v. FLRA, 677 F.2d 276 , 279 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 988 , 103 S.Ct. 343 , 74 L.Ed.2d 384 (1982); NeSmith v. Fulton, 615 F.2d 196, 200-01 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Giampa
Mathews, 485 U.S. at 62 , 108 S.Ct. at 886 ; Fedroff, 874 F.2d at 181 ; see also United States v. El-Gawli, 837 F.2d 142 (3d Cir.) (“Entrapment occurs when a defendant who was not predisposed to commit the crime does so as a result of the [Government’s inducement.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 34 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roy Lee Johnson
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39, 47 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988); United States v. Dejesus, 806 F.2d 31, 35-37 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1090 , 107 S.Ct. 1299 , 94 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987); United States v. Grandison, 783 F.2d 1152, 1155-56 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 845 , 107 S.Ct. 160 , 93 L.Ed.2d 99 (1986); United States v. Davis, 656 F.2d 153 (5th Cir. Unit B Sept. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 930 , 102 S.Ct. 1979 , 72 L.Ed.2d 446 (1982); but see United States v. Martin, 302 F.Supp. 498 (W.D.Pa.1969…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. Park
See, e.g., Stauber v. Cline, 837 F.2d 395, 399 (9th Cir.), cert. ___ ____ _______ _____ _____ denied, 488 U.S. 817 (1988); Illinois Nat'l Guard v. FLRA, 854 ______ ____________________ ____ F.2d 1396, 1398 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. Park
See, e.g., Stauber v. Cline, 837 F.2d 395, 399 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988); Illinois Nat’l Guard v. FLRA 854 F.2d 1396 , 1398 (D.C.Cir.1988); American Fed’n, 730 F.2d at 1545-46 ; New Jersey Air Nat’l Guard v. FLRA 677 F.2d 276 , 279 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 988 , 103 S.Ct. 343 , 74 L.Ed.2d 384 (1982); Nesmith v. Fulton, 615 F.2d 196, 200-01 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roy L. Johnson
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39, 47 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988); United States v. DeJesus, 806 F.2d 31, 35-37 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1090 , 107 S.Ct. 1299 , 94 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987); United States v. Grandison, 783 F.2d 1152, 1155-56 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 845 , 107 S.Ct. 160 , 93 L.Ed.2d 99 (1986); United States v. Davis, 656 F.2d 153 (5th Cir.1981) cert. denied, 456 U.S. 930 , 102 S.Ct. 1979 , 72 L.Ed.2d 446 (1982); but see United States v. Martin, 302 F.Supp. 498 (W.D.Pa.1969), aff’d, 428…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watkins v. State
(2×)
See also Poole v. United States , 832 F.2d 561 (11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 54 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shapiro v. Saybrook Manufacturing Co. (In re Saybrook Manufacturing Co.)
See also Unsecured Creditors’ Committee v. First National Bank & Trust Co. (In re Ellingsen MacLean Oil Co.), 834 F.2d 599 (6th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shapiro v. Saybrook Manufacturing Co.
See also Unsecured Creditors’ Committee v. First National Bank & Trust Co. (In re Ellingsen MacLean Oil Co.), 834 F.2d 599 (6th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In The Matter Of Saybrook Manufacturing Co., Inc.
See also Unsecured Creditors' Committee v. First National Bank & Trust Co. (In re Ellingsen MacLean Oil Co.), 834 F.2d 599 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988). 19 We reject the reasoning of In re Adams Apple and In re Ellingsen because they "put the cart before the horse." By its own terms, section 364(e) is only applicable if the challenged lien or priority was authorized under section 364.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gregory S. Brebner
See also United States v. Orellanes, 809 F.2d 1526, 1528 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marsha L. Lutz v. Secretary of the Air Force, and Gerald L. Ivory, Manuel E. Ferdin, and United States of America
See e.g., Stauber v. Cline, 837 F.2d 395 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988); Trerice v. Pedersen, 769 F.2d 1398, 1403 (9th Cir.1985); Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 628 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984); Mattos v. United States, 412 F.2d 793, 794 (9th Cir.1969). 5 Thus, if Major Lutz’s injuries arose out of or were in the course of activity incident to service, then the Feres doctrine would preclude her recovery on either her Bivens claims or her common law tort claims.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Norman
But it does not follow they are free, in identical circumstances, to make martyrs of their children before they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can make that choice for themselves." Prince, 321 U.S. at 170 ; see also Commonwealth v. Barnhart, 345 Pa. Super. 10 , 497 A.2d 616 (1985), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thompson
Compare United States v. Bruscantini, 761 F.2d 640 (11th Cir.) (relying on federal law and holding that a nolo plea, adjudication withheld, qualifies as a “conviction” for purposes of a federal prosecution under section 922), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 904 , 106 S.Ct. 271 , 88 L.Ed.2d 233 (1985) and United States v. Garcia, 727 F.2d 1028 (11th Cir.1984) (same) with United States v. Grinkiewicz, 873 F.2d 253 (11th Cir.1989) (relying on state law and holding that a guilty plea, adjudication withheld, qualifies as a “conviction” for purposes of section 922(g)(1)) and United States v. Orellane…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Medomak Canning, Debtor. Dennis G. Bezanson, Trustee v. Bayside Enterprises, Inc., Cara Corporation, Cross-Claim in Re Medomak Canning, Debtor. Dennis G. Bezanson, Trustee v. Bayside Enterprises, Inc., Acme Engineering Company, Cross-Claim
See also United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988) (privity can be established for purposes of collateral estoppel by virtual representation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bezanson v. Bayside Enterprises, Inc. (In re Medomak Canning)
See also United States v. Bonilla Romero, 836 F.2d 39 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 817 , 109 S.Ct. 55 , 102 L.Ed.2d 33 (1988) (privity can be established for purposes of collateral estoppel by virtual representation).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ellis
v.
Massachusetts
v.
Massachusetts
No. 87-1762.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
488 U.S. 817
Published
App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.