green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…edwards rule does not apply to suspects who are not in continuous custody between the time they request counsel and the time they are reinterviewed
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2004 ·
…moreover, in contrast to britt, appellant's attorneys had access to portions of the actual transcripts of the first trial.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert E. Kennedy v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California
(2×)
moreover, in contrast to britt, appellant's attorneys had access to portions of the actual transcripts of the first trial.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Barlow
edwards rule does not apply to suspects who are not in continuous custody between the time they request counsel and the time they are reinterviewed
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Barlow
edwards rule does not apply to suspects who are not in continuous custody between the time they request counsel and the time they are reinterviewed
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Robert Raymond Tingue v. Ryan Thornell, et al.
Brown v. Easter, 68 F.3d 1209, 1211 (9th Cir. 24 1995); Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 25 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorsey v. State
See Lindsey v. Smith, 820 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989); Sullivan v. Dugger, 721 F.2d 719 (11th Cir.1983); Lowenfield v. Phelps, 817 F.2d 285 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd, 484 U.S. 231 , 108 S.Ct. 546 , 98 L.Ed.2d 568 (1988); Stephens v. State, 580 So.2d 11 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), aff'd, 580 So.2d 26 (Ala.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 859 , 112 S.Ct. 176 , 116 L.Ed.2d 138 (1991); Thompson v. State, 542 So.2d 1286 (Ala.Cr.App.1988), aff'd, 542 So.2d 1300 (Ala.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 874 , 110 S.Ct. 208 , 107 L.Ed.2d 161 (1989); Jackson v. Sta…
cited
Cited "see"
Woods v. State
See Willis v. Kemp, 838 F.2d 1510, 1521 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1328 , 103 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989)." Likewise in this case Smith was shot in the head.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryant v. State
See Lindsey v. Smith , 820 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989); Sullivan v. Dugger , 721 F.2d 719 (11th Cir.1983); Lowenfield v. Phelps , 817 F.2d 285 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd, 484 U.S. 231 , 108 S.Ct. 546 , 98 L.Ed.2d 568 (1988); Stephens v. State , 580 So.2d 11 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), aff'd, 580 So.2d 26 (Ala.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 859 , 112 S.Ct. 176 , 116 L.Ed.2d 138 (1991); Thompson v. State , 542 So.2d 1286 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), aff'd, 542 So.2d 1300 (Ala.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 874 , 110 S.Ct. 208 , 107 L.Ed.2d 161 (1989); Jackson…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryant v. State
See Lindsey v. Smith, 820 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989); Sullivan v. Dugger, 721 F.2d 719 (11th Cir.1983); Lowenfield v. Phelps, 817 F.2d 285 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd, 484 U.S. 231 , 108 S.Ct. 546 , 98 L.Ed.2d 568 (1988); Stephens v. State, 580 So.2d 11 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), aff'd, 580 So.2d 26 (Ala.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 859 , 112 S.Ct. 176 , 116 L.Ed.2d 138 (1991); Thompson v. State, 542 So.2d 1286 (Ala.Cr.App.1988), aff'd, 542 So.2d 1300 (Ala.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 874 , 110 S.Ct. 208 , 107 L.Ed.2d 161 (1989); Jackson v. Sta…
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitehead v. State
See Lindsey v. Smith, 820 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989); Sullivan v. Dugger, 721 F.2d 719 (11th Cir.1983); Lowenfield v. Phelps, 817 F.2d 285 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd, 484 U.S. 231 , 108 S.Ct. 546 , 98 L.Ed.2d 568 (1988); Stephens v. State, 580 So.2d 11 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), aff'd, 580 So.2d 26 (Ala.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 859 , 112 S.Ct. 176 , 116 L.Ed.2d 138 (1991); Thompson v. State, 542 So.2d 1286 (Ala.Cr.App.1988), aff'd, 542 So.2d 1300 (Ala.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 874 , 110 S.Ct. 208 , 107 L.Ed.2d 161 (1989); Jackson v. St…
discussed
Cited "see"
Dillingham v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See Simmons v. Commonwealth, Ky., 746 S.W.2d 393, 395 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1328 , 103 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burgess v. State
See Lindsey v. Smith, 820 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989); Sullivan v. Dugger, 721 F.2d 719 (11th Cir.1983); Lowenfield v. Phelps, 817 F.2d 285 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd, 484 U.S. 231 , 108 S.Ct. 546 , 98 L.Ed.2d 568 (1988); Stephens v. State, 580 So.2d 11 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), aff'd, 580 So.2d 26 (Ala.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 859 , 112 S.Ct. 176 , 116 L.Ed.2d 138 (1991); Thompson v. State, 542 So.2d 1286 (Ala.Cr.App.1988), aff'd, 542 So.2d 1300 (Ala.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 874 , 110 S.Ct. 208 , 107 L.Ed.2d 161 (1989); Jackson v. St…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mills v. Singletary
See Lindsey v. Smith, 820 F.2d 1137, 1154 (11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 (1989); Tucker v. Zant, 724 F.2d 882, 895 (11th Cir. 1984); Moore v. Balkcom, 716 F.2d 1511, 1518 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1084 (1984).9 are Florida trial judges provided with procedural rules to aid them in performing their duty in a constitutional manner, the likelihood that they will succeed in ignoring these rules or incorrectly following them is reduced significantly by meaningful appellate review.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mills v. Singletary
See Lindsey v. Smith, 820 F.2d 1137, 1154 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1827 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989); Tucker v. Zant, 724 F.2d 882, 895 (11th Cir.1984); Moore v. Balkcom, 716 F.2d 1511, 1518 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1084 , 104 S.Ct. 1456 , 79 L.Ed.2d 773 (1984). 9 Mills next argues that the application of the “law of the case” doctrine, and the inconsistent application of the Tedder standard in Florida courts at the time of his review, resulted in the arbitrary imposition of his death sentence.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McKenzie
See Dunkins v. Thigpen, 854 F.2d 394 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Edwin Coe Bergman v. W.A. Duncan, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
See Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 (1989). 7 We agree with the district court that Bergman has failed to exhaust his conflict of interest claim.
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Easter
See Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8295, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,338 Gary Brown v. Louis Easter, Superintendent, Spring Creek Correctional Center, Alaska Department of Corrections
See Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Alexander v. Rocha
See Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528-30 (9th Cir. 1987) (exhaustion may be satisfied by fairly presenting claim to state's highest court on direct appeal or collateral review), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
See Willis v. Kemp, 838 F.2d 1510, 1522-23 (11th Cir.1988) (although improper, prosecutor’s question of black defendant as to whether he referred to his white victim as a “honkey” was not grounds for granting a mistrial), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1328 , 103 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989); United States v. Krohn, 573 F.2d 1382, 1389 (10th Cir.) (government’s eliciting from a witness that one of two white defendants on trial for mail fraud had referred to a victim of their scheme as a “poor black bastard!’ was not an appeal to racial prejudice), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 949 , 98 S.C…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
See Willis v. Kemp, 838 F.2d 1510, 1522-23 (11th Cir.1988) (although improper, prosecutor's question of black defendant as to whether he referred to his white victim as a "honkey" was not grounds for granting a mistrial), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1328 , 103 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989); United States v. Krohn, 573 F.2d 1382, 1389 (10th Cir.) (government's eliciting from a witness that one of two white defendants on trial for mail fraud had referred to a victim of their scheme as a "poor black bastard" was not an appeal to racial prejudice), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 949 , 98 S.Ct. 2857 , 56 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack E. Alderman v. Walter D. Zant
See Lindsey v. Smith, 820 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir.1987) (holding that district court correctly applied state law procedural bar to petitioner's jury challenge, despite state court's failure to indicate that its denial of petition rested on procedural grounds, where petitioner never raised facially sufficient jury challenge before any state court and state court’s denial of petition could not be construed as a decision on the merits), cert. *1551 denied, 489 U.S. 1059 [ 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 ] (1989); see also Collier v. Jones, 910 F.2d 770 (11th Cir.1990); Ladd v. Jones, 864 F.2d 108,…
cited
Cited "see"
Nathan Kevin Turner v. Joseph Compoy, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
See Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 529-30 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 (1989) 2 Turner was not given an opportunity to show cause for or prejudice from his default.
discussed
Cited "see"
Salazar v. State
(2×)
See Dunkins v. Thigpen, 854 F.2d 394, 399 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Galford
See Dunkins v. Thigpen, 854 F.2d 394 (11th Cir. 1988), cert, denied, 489 U.S. 1059 (1989); McFadden v. Garraghty, 820 F.2d 654, 661 (4th Cir. 1987); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. State
See Willis v. Kemp, 838 F.2d 1510, 1521 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1328 , 103 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles Paul Blevins v. Roger W. Crist
See Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 529 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Ricky Carter v. Bill Armontrout
See Willis v. Kemp, 838 F.2d 1510 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1328 , 103 L.Ed.2d 596 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lord v. State
See People v. Brown, 46 Cal.3d 432 , 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135, 1144-45 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989) (stating "reasonable possibility" standard for harmless error analysis of errors of constitutional law).
cited
Cited "see"
White v. State
See Lindsey v. Smith , 820 F.2d 1137 , 1152-53 (11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shatzer v. State
(2×)
See also Dunkins v. Thigpen, 854 F.2d 394, 397 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989); McFadden v. Garraghty, 820 F.2d 654, 661 (4th Cir.1987); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henderson
See, e.g., Lindsey v. Smith, 820 F.2d 1137, 1154 (11th Cir.1987) cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989). 16 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melendez-Garcia
See also Dunkins v. Thigpen, 854 F.2d 894, 398-99 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989); United States v. Young, 529 F.2d 193 (4th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duane E. Nicholas v. Robert Wright Theodore R. Kulongoski
See Castille v. Peoples, 489 U.S. 346, 351 (1989); see also Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987) (stating that if state mandates particular procedure to be used when seeking relief, presentation of an issue to state's highest court via statutorily deviating path will not exhaust state remedies), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marenghi
See also, Dunkins v. Thigpen, 854 F.2d 394, 398-99 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989); United States v. Young, 529 F.2d 193, 195 (4th Cir.1975); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberts v. Singletary
Johnson , 938, F.2d at 1183; see also Lindsey v. Smith, 820 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir.1987) (no constitutional infirmity in considering parole as being “under sentence of imprisonment” where there were at least two other constitutionally sufficient circumstances), cer t. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1327 , 103 L.Ed.2d 595 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie v. State
See, e.g., Dunkins v. Thigpen, 854 F.2d 394, 397 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989); McFadden v. Garraghty, 820 F.2d 654, 661 (4th Cir.1987); United States v. Fairman, 813 *667 F.2d 117, 125 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1010 , 107 S.Ct. 3240 , 97 L.Ed.2d 745 (1987); United States v. Skinner, 667 F.2d 1306, 1309 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 3569 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1410 (1983) (pre- Roberson ); Wilson v. State, 573 So.2d 77, 79 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1990); State v. Furlough, 797 S.W.2d 631, 640 (Tenn.Cr.App. 1990); St…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Green
(2×)
See, e.g., Dunkins v. Thigpen, 854 F.2d 394, 397 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989); United States v. Skinner, 667 F.2d 1306, 1309 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 3569 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1410 (1983). 2 Similarly, I believe that the government is correct in its assertion that when a defendant has pled guilty to the charge which prompted the invocation of the right to counsel, circumstances have so significantly changed that any coercive effect created by the original confinement must be deemed to have been dissipated, certain…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chambers
v.
DuCharme, Superintendent, Washington State Reformatory
v.
DuCharme, Superintendent, Washington State Reformatory
No. 88-6419.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (2) · Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.