green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.7 score
“intent to defraud" means "to act willfully, and with the specific intent to deceive or cheat for the purpose of either causing some financial loss to another, or bringing about some financial gain to oneself.”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Uri Sheinbaum, United States of America v. Marc A. Birnbaum
But see United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 853-54 (9th Cir.) (rejecting the Bruchey holding), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989).
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Sheinbaum
But see United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 853-54 (9th Cir.) (rejecting the Bruchey holding), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989).
cited
Cited "but see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. URI SHEINBAUM
But see United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 853-54 (9th Cir.) (rejecting the Bruchey holding), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 (1989).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Hamburger
did not waive either a direct or subrogation right to receive vwpa restitution when it settled claim of loss.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hornback v. United States
exhaustion is required herein because plaintiff may vindicate his rights at the administrative level, thus making court intervention unnecessary.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Joseph LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant
intent to defraud" means "to act willfully, and with the specific intent to deceive or cheat for the purpose of either causing some financial loss to another, or bringing about some financial gain to oneself.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Karam
See United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 854 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 (1989); United States v. Sheinbaum, 136 F.3d 443, 447-48 (5th Cir. 1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Edward Karam
See United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 854 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989); United States v. Sheinbaum, 136 F.3d 443, 447-48 (5th Cir.1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. City of Hialeah
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000, 1006 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989); Kirkland, 711 F.2d at 1130 ("[A] showing of a prima facie case of employment discrimination through a statistical demonstration of disproportionate racial impact constitutes a sufficiently serious claim of discrimination to serve as a predicate for a voluntary compromise containing race-conscious remedies."); see also Croson, 488 U.S. at 500 , 109 S.Ct. at 725 (holding that city set-aside plan lacked strong basis in evidence because "there [was] nothing approaching a pr…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. City of Hialeah
(2×)
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000, 1006 (11th Cir.), cert. denied., 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989); Kirkland, 711 F.2d at 1130 ("[A] showing of a prima facie case of employment discrimination through a statistical demonstration of disproportionate racial impact constitutes a sufficiently serious claim of discrimination to serve as a predicate for a voluntary compromise containing race-conscious remedies.”); see also Croson, 488 U.S. at 500 , 109 S.Ct. at 725 (holding that city set-aside plan lacked strong basis in evidence because “there [was] nothing approaching…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ho by Ho v. San Francisco Unified School Dist.
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000, 1006 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989). 6 Because defendants have the burden of justifying their classification scheme, to prevail on summary judgment plaintiffs need only show the absence of a dispute of a material fact, and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with respect to a single element of the analysis.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dean
See United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 854-55, n. 11 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989). 1 In United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989), the court applied the Eighth Amendment to a defendant’s claim that his overall sentence, which included an order of restitution, was excessive.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest Joe Maddox
See United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 857 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 (1989); see also United States v. Ruffen, 780 F.2d 1493, 1495 (9th Cir.) (defendant may petition later for remittitur if unable to pay full amount of restitution), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 963 (1986). 5 Because the restitution orders of his codefendants were vacated by this court in United States v. Baker, 25 F.3d 1452 (9th Cir.1994), Maddox contends that his restitution order also must be vacated.
cited
Cited "see"
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9376, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,355 United States of America v. Anthony C. Sarno and Charles W. Knapp, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Joseph v. Nash
See United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 852 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sarno
See United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 852 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 42,940 United States of America v. Wendy Miller Desalvo
See United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 857 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Ensley Branch, N.A.A.C.P. Donald Nixon William Moss Alvin Mahaffey, Jr., Birmingham Fire Fighters Association 117 Birmingham Association of City Employees, Intervenors v. George Seibels, Individually and as Mayor of the City of Birmingham, John W. Martin Major Florence Ida McGruder Sam Coar, Birmingham Fire Fighters Association 117 Birmingham Association of City Employees Billy Gray, Intervenors v. City of Birmingham George C. Seibels, Jr. Mayor of Birmingham Jefferson County Personnel Board, United States of America, Birmingham Fire Fighters Association 117, Intervenors, Robert K. Wilks James A. Bennett Floyd E. Click James D. Morgan Joel Alan Day, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. Jefferson County, City of Birmingham and George G. Seibels
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000, 1008 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Branch v. Seibels
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000, 1008 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Alan A. Peightal v. Metropolitan Dade County, Metropolitan Fire Department of Dade County
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000, 1008 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Birmingham Reverse Discrimination Employment Litigation. James A. Bennett, Floyd E. Click James D. Morgan Joel Alan Day Gene E. Northington Vincent Joseph Vella and Lane L. Denard, Cross v. Richard Arrington, Jr., as Mayor of the City of Birmingham City of Birmingham James B. Johnson Henry P. Johnston and Hiram Y. McKinney as Members of the Jefferson County Personnel Board Joseph W. Curtin, as Director of the Jefferson County Personnel Board and Jefferson County Personnel Board, John W. Martin, Major Florence, Ida McGruder Sam Coar, Eugene Thomas, Charles Howard, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees-Cross United States of America, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. Birmingham Association of City Employees, an Unincorporated Labor Association, and Kenneth O. Ware, Gerald L. Johnson Phillip H. Whitley David H. Woodall Danny R. Laughlin Marshall G. Whitson Dudley L. Greenway v. Richard Arrington, Jr., as Mayor of the City of Birmingham City of Birmingham James B. Johnson Henry P. Johnston and Hiram Y. McKinney as Members of the Jefferson County Personnel Board Joseph W. Curtin, as Director of the Jefferson County Personnel Board Jefferson County Personnel Board and the United States of America, John W. Martin, Major Florence, Ida McGruder Sam Coar, Wanda Thomas, Eugene Thomas and Charles Howard, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees, Cross Robert K. Wilks Carlice E. Payne Ronnie J. Chambers John E. Garvich, Jr., James W. Henson Robert Bruce Millsap, Cross United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Howard E. Pope, Charles E. Carlin, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. Henry P. Johnston, John W. Martin, Major Florence, Ida McGruder Sam Coar, Eugene Thomas and Charles Howard, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees-Cross Wanda Thomas, Defendant-Intervenor
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000 , 1003 & n. 5 (11th Cir.) (approving consent decree providing back pay relief and 240 promotions to black civilian Air Force Base employees into "most likely jobs lost by blacks" due to discrimination), cert. denied 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Ensley Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Seibels
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000, 1008 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Arrington
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000 , 1003 & n. 5 (11th Cir.) (approving consent decree providing back pay relief and 240 promotions to black civilian Air Force Base employees into “most likely jobs lost by blacks” due to discrimination), cert. denied 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Black Fire Fighters Ass'n of Dallas v. City of Dallas, Tex.
See Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000, 1005 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989); Howard v. McLucas, 782 F.2d 956, 958-959 (11th Cir.1986); Kirkland v. New York State Dep’t of Correctional Servs., 711 F.2d 1117 , 1128 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 997 , 79 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eva Patrick Verner
See United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 855 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 (1989) 2 Verner's calculation of the twelve months starts from September 18, 1989, instead of November 9, 1989, which was when she was transferred to federal custody.
discussed
Cited "see"
Levine v. Diamanthuset, Inc.
To show a Rule 10b-5 violation, a private plaintiff must prove a “causal connection between a defendant’s misrepresentation and [the] plaintiff’s injury.” Basic, Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 243 , 108 S.Ct. 978, 979 , 99 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988); accord Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 857 F.2d 646, 650 (9th Cir.1988) (per curiam), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989); see also SEC v. Clark, 915 F.2d 439, 449 (9th Cir.1990). 7 The private plaintiff must also prove a proximate relationship between the plaintiff’s injury and the purchase or sale of…
discussed
Cited "see"
Levine v. Diamanthuset, Inc.
To show a Rule 10b-5 violation, a private plaintiff must prove a "causal connection between a defendant's misrepresentation and [the] plaintiff's injury." Basic, Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 243 , 108 S.Ct. 978, 979 , 99 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988); accord Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 857 F.2d 646, 650 (9th Cir.1988) (per curiam), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989); see also SEC v. Clark, 915 F.2d 439, 449 (9th Cir.1990). 7 The private plaintiff must also prove a proximate relationship between the plaintiff's injury and the purchase or sale of a securit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Specialist THOMAS E. RUSSELL, JR.
Compare United States v. Dean, 31 M.J. 196 (C.M.A.1990), cert denied, 499 U.S. 906 , 111 S.Ct. 1106 , 113 L.Ed.2d 215 (1991) (statements by six-year-old to medical center coordinator of child protective team and staff psychologist at county mental health center admissible), and United States v. Edens, 31 M.J. 267 (C.M.A.1990) (statements by three-year-old child to pediatrician admissible), with United States v. Avila, 27 M.J. 62 (C.M.A.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 562 , 107 L.Ed.2d 557 (1989) (statement by four-year-old child to psychologist who introduced herself by first na…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.
See id. at 1517-18 (finding that the record evidence supported an inference of a conspiracy in multiple ways and was sufficient to preclude summary judgment); Alfas, 745 F.Supp. at 1521 ; see also Roberts v. Heim, 670 F.Supp. 1466, 1484-85 (N.D.Cal.1987) (specific facts must be alleged from which an understanding or agreement may be inferred), rev’d in part on other grounds, Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 857 F.2d 646, 650 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bruce J. Rice, and Rice Aircraft, Inc., United States of America v. Bruce Rice
However, “[n]either the [Victim and Witness Protection] Act nor Rule 32 requires the sentencing court to hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of restitution.” United States v. Keith, 754 F.2d 1388, 1392 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 93 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985); see also United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846 , 855 n. 11 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989) (“[N]othing in the text or legislative history of the VWPA [] indicated] that Congress intended the sentencing hearing to be transformed into a second trial on the issue …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reich v. ABC/York-Estes Corp.
See also Howard v. McLucas, 782 F.2d 956 (11th Cir.1986) (although petitioners had long been aware of discrimination suit against their employer, intervention to oppose a proposed settlement was timely because petitioners could not have anticipated that the settlement would affect their interests), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989); South v. Rowe, 759 F.2d 610 (7th Cir.1985) (although motion to intervene to enforce a consent decree between former prison inmate and state was made only one day before decree was scheduled to expire, motion was timely because pet…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alan Speights Luster
See also United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846, 855 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Newman v. Comprehensive Care Corp.
See e.g., Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 857 F.2d 646, 649 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 561 , 107 L.Ed.2d 556 (1989); In re Fin.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
District No. 1, Pacific Coast District, Marine Engineers' Beneficial Assn.
v.
Finnie
v.
Finnie
No. 89-193.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1989.
493 U.S. 1002
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.