green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pancan International Management Consultants, Inc. v. STS Microscan, Inc.
a corporation organized under the laws of a foreign nation remains an alien corporation under 1332(c), even if its principal place of business is in one of the states
discussed
Cited "see"
Astra Oil Trading NV v. PRSI Trading Co. LP
See Int’l Shipping Co. v. Hydra Offshore, 875 F.2d 388 , 391 (2d Cir.1989) (upholding Rule 11 sanctions against attorney for arguing alien corporation’s sole citizenship was U.S. State of its principal place of business), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); see also Universal Licensing Corp. v. Paola del Lungo S.p.A, 293 F.3d 579 (2d Cir.2002); Franceskin v. Credit Suisse, 214 F.3d 253 (2d Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carr v. Fischer
See Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. at 278 , 92 S.Ct. 509 ; accord Waterhouse v. Rodriguez, 848 F.2d 375, 381 (2d Cir.1988) (noting that “[t]he legal theory relied upon in the federal court need not ... be identical to the legal theory presented to the state courts, provided that the essential factual allegations and the ultimate constitutional question raised in the federal petition were presented to the state courts”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 564 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Savino v. Computer Credit, Inc.
See Note on Advisory Committee to Rule 11, 1993 Amendments; accord International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 392 (2d Cir.) (Rule 11 empowers a court with broad discretion to award that portion of an attorney’s fee thought reasonable to serve the sanctioning purpose of the Rule), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Gatto v. Board of Zoning Appeals, No. 394247 (Sep. 3, 1997)
Accord Burns v. Barrett, 212 Conn. 176 , 182 , 561 A.2d 1378 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Photocircuits Corp. v. Marathon Agents, Inc.
See Note on Advisory Committee to Rule 11, 1993 Amendments; accord International Shipping Co., S.A v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 392 (2d Cir.) (Rule 11 empowers a court with broad discretion to award that portion of an attorney’s fee thought reasonable to serve the sanctioning purpose of the Rule), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curtis L. Wrenn v. Vanderbilt University Hospital John C. Callison U.S. Department of Justice Secretary of Health and Human Services Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
See International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 392 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 (1989); Donaldson v. Clark, 819 F.2d 1551, 1560 (11th Cir.1987) (en banc), INVST Financial Group, Inc. v. Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc., 815 F.2d 391, 405 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 927 (1987). 12 Finally, we note that past sanctions against Wrenn's vexatious litigation in the form of monetary awards have had less than the desired effect.
discussed
Cited "see"
Louisiana Debating and Literary Ass'n v. City of New Orleans
See Moore v. City of Kilgore, Tex., 877 F.2d 364, 390 (5th Cir.) (court will not consider a facial challenge to a regulation when plaintiff has succeeded in an as-applied challenge and when he failed to assert the rights of third parties), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 562 , 107 L.Ed.2d 557 (1989). 14 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirschner v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Incorporated Village of Valley Stream
See Notes on Advisory Committee to Rule 11, 1993 Amendments; accord International Shipping v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388 , 392 (2d Cir.) (Rule 11 empowers a court with broad discretion to award that portion of an attorney’s fee thought reasonable to serve the sanctioning purpose of the Rule), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Treasury Employees Union v. United States of America, National Treasury Employees Union v. United States of America, Peter G. Crane v. United States of America, National Treasury Employees Union v. United States of America, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. United States of America, Peter G. Crane v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Moore v. City of Kilgore, 877 F.2d 364, 390-92 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 562 , 107 L.Ed.2d 557 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cento Group, S.P.A. v. OroAmerica, Inc.
See International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 390 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Golub v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); Oliveri v. Thompson, 803 F.2d 1265, 1274-75 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 918 , 107 S.Ct. 1373 , 94 L.Ed.2d 689 (1987); Quadrozzi v. City of New York, 127 F.R.D. 63, 79 (S.D.N.Y.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Daly v. DelPonte
See Burns v. Barrett, 212 Conn. 176, 184 , 561 A.2d 1378 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S. Ct. 563 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Treasury Employees Union v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Moore v. City of Kilgore, 877 F.2d 364, 390-92 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 562 , 107 L.Ed.2d 557 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Efferson v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
See Kelly v. Smith, 485 F.2d 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Chicot Land Co. v. Kelly, 416 U.S. 969 , 94 S.Ct. 1991 , 40 L.Ed.2d 558 (1974), Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co., 826 F.2d 1419 (5th Cir.1987), and Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co., 872 F.2d 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Columbus-McKinnon v. Gearench, Inc., 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Daly v. DelPonte
See Burns v. Barrett, 212 Conn. 176, 184 , 561 A.2d 1378 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S. Ct. 563 , 107 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Empire State Pharmaceutical Society, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Greater New York
See Int’l Shipping Co. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388 , 390 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Neat-N-Tidy Co., Inc. v. Tradepower (Holdings) Ltd.
See International Shipping Co. S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 391 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-Cio
See International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 390-91 (2d Cir.) (court will not tolerate " 'post hoc sleight of hand' "), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 -64, 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989). 29 If Rule 11 has been violated, sanctions are mandatory.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
See International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 390-91 (2d Cir.) (court will not tolerate “ ‘post hoc sleight of hand’ ”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 -64, 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony Armienti v. United States
See also Waterhouse v. Rodriguez, 848 F.2d 375 , *824 383 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 564 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989) (refusing to extend per se rule “beyond the sort of egregious conduct present in Soli-na and Cancilla”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gordon v. Mendelsohn (In Re Who's Who Worldwide Registry, Inc.)
See also Int’l Shipping Co. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388 , 390 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spetalieri v. Kavanaugh
See, e.g., Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm’n., 518 U.S. 727 , 116 S.Ct. 2374, 2416 , 135 L.Ed.2d 888 (1996) (indecent cable programming entitled to marginal free speech protection); New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 , 102 S.Ct. 3348, 3367 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (1982) (marginal speech not entitled to full protection of the First Amendment) (Stevens, J. concurring); compare Moore v. City of Kilgore, 877 F.2d 364, 369 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 562 , 107 L.Ed.2d 557 (1989). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Askir v. Boutros-Ghali
See, e.g., International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 391-92 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v Pubrat
(2×)
Once someone has overcome the hurdles to gain admission to the bar of this state, we will not lightly set aside that admission. [2] See, e.g., Solina v. United States, 709 F.2d 160 (C.A.2, 1983) (the outright violation of a defendant's right to counsel when counsel was never admitted to the bar, despite a reasonably competent performance); State v. Smith, 476 N.W.2d 511 (Minn., 1991) (the Sixth Amendment requires reversal per se when counsel was never admitted to the bar); People v. Felder, 47 N.Y.2d 287 , 418 N.Y.S.2d 295 , 391 N.E.2d 1274 (1979) (automatic reversal was limited to representat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kusek v. Family Circle, Inc.
See also Banner Indus. v. Central States Pension Fund, 875 F.2d 1285 , 1294 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); and Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, *531 Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 693-94 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981). “[W]here the claimant [fails] to exercise due diligence in preserving [her] legal rights, courts are reluctant to apply principles of equitable tolling to extend a federal limitation.” de Casenave v. United States, 991 F.2d 11, 13 (1st Cir.1993), citing Irwin v. Veterans A…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silver Star Enterprises, Inc. v. M/v Saramacca, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Etc., in Rem
Bank, 69 F.2d 491, 492 (5th Cir.1934); see also Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co., 872 F.2d 1221, 1227 (5th Cir.) (stating that in a diversity suit, jurisdiction is ordinarily "determined at the commencement of the lawsuit, such that subsequent occurrences will not divest the court of subject-matter jurisdiction"), cer t. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989). 7 ., The district court's order was not set forth in a separate document. 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silver Star Enterprises, Inc. v. M/V Saramacca
Bank, 69 F.2d 491, 492 (5th Cir. 1934); see also Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co., 872 F.2d 1221, 1227 (5th Cir.) (stating that in a diversity suit, jurisdiction is ordinarily "determined at the commencement of the lawsuit, such that subsequent occurrences will not divest the court of subject-matter jurisdiction"), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S. Ct. 563 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Powers v. British Vita, P.L.C.
If a court determines that a pleading, motion, or other paper is not well-grounded in fact, the court “shall impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction____” Fed.R.Civ.P. 11; see also International Shipping Co., S.A v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 390 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); Eastway Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Belyeu v. Coosa County Board of Education
See, e.g., Moore v. City of Kilgore, 877 F.2d 364, 369-76 (5th Cir.) (fire department impermissibly applied rule forbidding unauthorized discussion of department policy to discipline employee’s speech), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 562 , 107 L.Ed.2d 557 (1989); Luethje, 872 F.2d at 354-56 (rule prohibiting discussion of school problems with anyone other than principal unconstitutional); Anderson v. Central Point School Dist., 746 F.2d 505 , 507 (9th Cir.1984) (per curiam) (upholding injunction against policy forbidding direct communication by teachers to school board); Czurlanis v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Belyeu v. Coosa County Board Of Education
See, e.g., Moore v. City of Kilgore, 877 F.2d 364, 369-76 (5th Cir.) (fire department impermissibly applied rule forbidding unauthorized discussion of department policy to discipline employee's speech), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 562 , 107 L.Ed.2d 557 (1989); Luethje, 872 F.2d at 354-56 (rule prohibiting discussion of school problems with anyone other than principal unconstitutional); Anderson v. Central Point School Dist., 746 F.2d 505 , 507 (9th Cir.1984) (per curiam) (upholding injunction against policy forbidding direct communication by teachers to school board); Czurlanis v. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lavon R. Kent
(2×)
Id. at 425 , 105 S.Ct. at 2088 ; see also United States v. Nofziger, 878 F.2d 442, 454 (D.C.Cir.) (interpreting an ambiguous subsection of the Ethics in Government Act as requiring the government to demonstrate that the defendant had knowledge of the facts that made his conduct criminal), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 564 , 107 L.Ed.2d 559 (1989); United States v. Sherbondy, 865 F.2d 996, 1009 (9th Cir.1988) (rule of lenity requires that "[w]here the language of a penal statute admits of more than one interpretation, courts should choose least harsh construction"). 38 I disagree with…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Kilgore, Texas
v.
Moore
v.
Moore
No. 89-630.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1989.
493 U.S. 1003
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.