green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
13.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…a timely objection ... is a requisite to a batson claim.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Robert Lee Willis
See United States v. Aramony, 88 F.3d 1369, 1379-81 (4th Cir.1996) (approving instruction allowing for conviction of co-conspirators’ crimes, without requiring foreseeability), petition for cert. filed, 65 U.S.L.W. 3381 (U.S. Nov. 12, 1996) (No. 96-752); United States v. Gonzalez, 933 F.2d 417, 443 (7th Cir.1991) (to the same effect); United States v. Troop, 890 F.2d 1393, 1399-1400 (7th Cir.1989) (same); but see United States v. Broadwell, 870 F.2d 594, 603-05 (11th Cir.) (finding error but holding lack of foreseeability language was not prejudicial), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. …
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Willis
Instr. 19. 13 752); United States v. Gonzalez, 933 F.2d 417, 443 (7th Cir. 1991) (to the same effect); United States v. Troop, 890 F.2d 1393, 1399-1400 (7th Cir. 1989) (same); but see United States v. Broadwell, 870 F.2d 594, 603-05 (11th Cir.) (finding error but holding lack of foreseeability language was not prejudicial), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 (1989).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Munoz Franco
misstatements or omissions alone do not justify dismissing an indictment that is facially valid.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Adanandus v. Johnson
a timely objection and the corresponding opportunity to evaluate the circumstances of the jury selection process are essential to a trial court's reasoned application of the limitations placed on peremptory challenges by the batson holding.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ronald Wallingford
harmless contact between a juror and a security officer is not grounds for reversal
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Finn
whether a particular substantive crime is foreseeable and in furtherance of the conspiracy is a factual question to be determined by the jury.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Doe v. Burnham
a timely objection ... is a requisite to a batson claim.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Doe v. Burnham
a timely objection ... is a requisite to a batson claim.
cited
Cited "see"
Scheuing v. State
See Thomas v. Moore, 866 F.2d 803, 804-05 (5th Cir.[1989]), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 124 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989); Munn v. Algee, 730 F.Supp. 21, 29 (N.D.Miss.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Floyd v. State
See Thomas v. Moore, 866 F.2d 803, 804-05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 124 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989); Munn v. Algee, 730 F.Supp. 21, 29 (N.D.Miss.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hamed
See United States v. Bruno, 873 F.2d 555, 560-61 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 86 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES v. WILLIAM SOTO-BENÍQUEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JUAN SOTO-RAMÍREZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDUARDO ALICEA-TORRES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAMON FERNÁNDEZ-MALAVÉ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARMELO VEGA-PACHECO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARMANDO GARCÍA-GARCÍA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE LUIS DE LEÓN MAYSONET, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RENE GONZALEZ-AYALA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JUAN ENRIQUE CINTRÓN-CARABALLO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIGUEL VEGA-COLÓN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIGUEL VEGA-COSME
See United States v. Maceo, 873 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 86 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Soto-Beniquez
See United States v. Maceo, 873 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 86 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES v. WILLIAM SOTO-BENIQUEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JUAN SOTO-RAMIREZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDUARDO ALICEA-TORRES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAMON FERNANDEZ-MALAVÉ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARMELO VEGA-PACHECO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARMANDO GARCIA-GARCIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE LUIS DE LEON MAYSONET, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RENE GONZALEZ-AYALA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JUAN ENRIQUE CINTRON-CARABALLO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIGUEL VEGA-COLON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIGUEL VEGA-COSME
See United States v. Maceo, 873 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Doran Dee Robinson
See United States v. Covos, 872 F.2d 805, 809-10 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Doran Dee Robinson, Also Known as Dee Robinson
See United States v. Covos, 872 F.2d 805, 809-10 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 124 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tokars
See United States v. Broadwell, 870 F.2d 594, 603-04 (11th Cir.) (kidnaping reasonably foreseeable in a drug conspiracy), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S. Ct. 125 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tokars
See United States v. Broadwell, 870 F.2d 594, 603-04 (11th Cir.) (kidnapping reasonably foreseeable in a drug conspiracy), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840, 110 S.Ct. 125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989); United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 , 847-49 & n. 21 (11th Cir.) (murder reasonably foreseeable in a drug conspiracy), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985), and cert. denied, 482 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 2489 , 96 L.Ed.2d 380 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcos Loinas Anderson, A/K/A Marcos Loynas Anderson, A/K/A T. Torrero, A/K/A Samuel Perez, United States of America v. Maria Berdecia, A/K/A Maria C. Depalacio, A/K/A Consuela, United States of America v. Norberto Garces, A/K/A Victorio Torres, Piro, United States of America v. Gabriel Ruperto Davis-Munoz, A/K/A Gabriel Davis, Gabelin, United States of America v. Alfredo Brathwaite, A/K/A Sealy, Alfredo West, Freddie, United States of America v. Beverly Elaine Nelson, A/K/A Beverly M. Nelson, United States of America v. Robert Luis Castillo, A/K/A Robert Luis Castillo-Garrido, United States of America v. Antonio Scott, A/K/A Tony Anderson, Tony, United States of America v. Leonard Lancelot Shand, A/K/A Steve, United States of America v. Vielka Dudley, A/K/A Vielka Dudley-Maynard, Vielka Davis, Benky, United States of America v. Antonio Scott, A/K/A Tony Anderson, Tony, United States of America v. Michael Jonathan Booze, United States of America v. Thomas Timothy Booze, A/K/A Timmy, United States of America v. Gregory Orlander Booze
See United States v. Bruno, 873 F.2d 555, 560-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 86 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anderson
See United States v. Bruno, 873 F.2d 555, 560-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 86 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pineda-Paz
See United States v. Maceo, 873 F.2d 1, 3 (1st ___ _____________ _____ Cir.) (district court finding of harmless error in respect to errors at the grand jury stage reviewed only for an abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pineda-Paz
See United States v. Maceo, 873 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.) (district court finding of harmless error in respect to errors at the grand jury stage reviewed only for an abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Buhl
See United States v. Broadwell, 870 F. 2d 594 , 601 n. 16 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 125 , 107 L.Ed. 2d 85 (1989); United States v. Hall, 587 F. 2d 177, 181 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric Dannenburg
See United States v. Covos, 872 F.2d 805, 809-10 (8th Cir.) (rejecting overt act requirement and holding, as a consequence, that government's failure to prove particular acts alleged in indictment did not preclude conspiracy conviction on other sufficient evidence), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 (1989). 8 Turning now to the primary thrust of the first question, numerous decisions recognize that a conspiracy conviction may be supported by evidence of predicate acts different from those specifically alleged in the indictment.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth J. Masat
See Thomas v. Moore, 866 F.2d 803, 804-06 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 124 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989) (explaining importance of timely objection for Batson claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Seals, William H.
See, e.g., United States v. Broadwell, 870 F.2d 594 , 601 & n.16 (11th Cir.) (holding that unlawful restraint began when victim was abducted and "continued" after he was transported across state lines even though crime "complete" upon trans- port), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William H. Seals, A/K/A Puddin, A/K/A William Brooks, United States of America v. Gary W. Sweatt
See, e.g., United States v. Broadwell, 870 F.2d 594 , 601 & n. 16 (11th Cir.) (holding that unlawful restraint began when victim was abducted and “continued” after he was transported across state lines even though crime “complete” upon transport), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Seals, William H.
See, e.g., United States v. Broadwell, 870 F.2d 594 , 601 & n.16 (11th Cir.) (holding that unlawful restraint began when victim was abducted and "continued" after he was transported across state lines even though crime "complete" upon trans- port), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Floyd Alvin England, United States of America v. Chris A. Terrell, United States of America v. Myles Curtis, United States of America v. David L. Mosby, United States of America v. Ronnie D. Peacock
See, e.g., United States v. Covos, 872 F.2d 805, 810 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 124 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Snipe, A/K/A Michael Martin, A/K/A John Doe, A/K/A Mike
See also United States v. Maceo, 873 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 (1989) (upholding marshal's examination of a criminal defendant's teeth and gums while in defendant's cell to validate the detective's description of the defendant's teeth). 21 This case is analogous to other situations where courts have upheld orders requiring nontestimonial cooperation.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. England
See, e.g., United States v. Covos, 872 F.2d 805, 810 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 124 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wayne Olderbak
See also United States v. Covos, 872 F.2d 805, 807 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 124 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terry Wayne Quarles, United States of America v. Lamont Alberto Brown
(2×)
A conspiracy conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 846 does not require proof of an act in furtherance of the conspiracy; the statute only requires proof that the defendant "entered into an agreement with at least one other person and that the agreement had as its objective a violation of the law." United States v. Foote, 898 F.2d 659, 663 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 112 , 112 L.Ed.2d 81 (1990); see also United States v. Covos, 872 F.2d 805, 810 (8th Cir.) (holding that section 846 does not require proof of an overt act in addition to proof of an agreement), cert. denied, 493 U.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Watson, United States of America v. Tracy Watson
The evidence must only show that he “entered into an agreement with at least one other person and that the agreement had as its objective a violation of the law.” United States v. Foote, 898 F.2d 659, 663 (8th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, -, 111 S.Ct. 112 , 342, 112 L.Ed.2d 81 , 307 (1990); see also United States v. Covos, 872 F.2d 805, 810 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 124 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown
v.
Thomas, Superintendent, Georgia State Prison
v.
Thomas, Superintendent, Georgia State Prison
No. 88-7518.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.