green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2000 ·
…it is for the district court to determine what departures from its rules may be overlooked.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Eleven Vehicles
it is for the district court to determine what departures from its rules may be overlooked.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and Accessories
it is for the district court to determine what departures from its rules may be overlooked.
cited
Cited "see"
Blinzler v. Marriott Int'l
See ___ United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 47 (1st Cir.), ______________ ______________ cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.
See United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 47 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43 (1st Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d ___ _____________ ______________ 43 (1st Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Geraldo Rodriguez, A/K/A Jose Rodriguez
See United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 48 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. BAKER MATERIAL HANDLING CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee
The appropriate remedy for parties who uncover discovery violations is “not to seek reversal after an unfavorable verdict but a request for continuance at the time the surprise occurs.” Szeliga v. General Motors Corp., 728 F.2d 566, 568 (1st Cir.1984); see United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 47 (1st Cir.) (criminal case), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
US Fidelity v. Baker Material
Beatri- ce Foods Co., 900 F.2d at 391-92 . 11 who uncover discovery violations is "not to seek reversal after an unfavorable verdict but a request for continuance at the time the surprise occurs." Szeliga v. General Motors Corp., 728 F.2d 566, 568 (1st Cir. 1984); see United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 47 (1st Cir.) (criminal case), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rostoff
(2×)
See United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 52 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rostoff
See United States v. Diaz- ___ _____________ _____ Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 52 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 _________ _____ ______ (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Parkinson
See _______ ___ generally United States v. D az-Villafa e, 874 F.2d 43, 49 (1st _________ _____________ ______________ Cir.), cert. denied 493 U.S. 862 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Parkinson
See generally United States v. Díaz-Villafañe, 874 F.2d 43, 49 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosales
We review a sentencing court's decision to depart by examining "(1) whether the reasons the court gave for departing are the sort that might permit a departure in an appropriate case; (2) whether the record supports a finding -15- 15 of facts demonstrating the existence of such reasons; and (3) whether, given the reasons, the degree of departure [from about four years to ten] is reasonable." United States v. _____________ Mendez-Colon, No. 93-1346, slip op. at 3 (1st Cir. Jan. 19, ____________ 1994); see United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43 , 49 ___ ______________ ______________ (1st C…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosales
We review a sentencing court’s decision to depart by examining “(1) whether the reasons the court gave for departing are the sort that might permit a departure in an appropriate case; (2) whether the record supports a finding of facts demonstrating the existence of such reasons; and (3) whether, given the reasons, the degree of departure [from about four years to ten] is reasonable.” United States v. Mendez-Colon, 15 F.3d 188, 189 (1st Cir.1994); see United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 49 (lst Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989); Rivera, 9…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence C. Duso, Susan C. Duso, Michael A. Mercier
See United States v. Joan, 883 F.2d 491, 494 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 (1989). 41 The district court made two other statements which tend to explain the court's conduct, and we comment briefly on these.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roberts
See United ___ ______ States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 46 (1st Cir.), cert. ______ ______________ _____ denied, 493 U.S. 862 (1989); Aggarwal v. Ponce School of ______ ________ _________________ Medicine, 745 F.2d 723, 726 (1st Cir. 1984); Hawes v. Club ________ _____ ____ ____________________ 4We think it is equally plain that the district court's local rule should be clarified.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie Roberts
See United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 46 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989); Aggarwal v. Ponce School of Medicine, 745 F.2d 723, 726 (1st Cir.1984); Hawes v. Club Ecuestre El Comandante, 535 F.2d 140, 143-44 (1st Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yolanda C. Lara
See United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 49-50 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989) (Reasonableness of length of departure is "quintessentially a judgment call.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Edward Watts, United States of America v. David Henry Ritcherson, United States of America v. Mary Catherine Ritcherson F/k/a Mary Catherine Luter
See United States v. Jones, 875 F.2d 674, 675 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (acquittal of some defendants of a multi-count, multi-defendant indictment demonstrates the jury was able to compartmentalize the evidence of various charges against various defendants), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martha Tabares, United States v. Ramiro Ramirez
See United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 49-52 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989). 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Watts
See United States v. Jones, 875 F.2d 674, 675 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (acquittal of some defendants of a multi-count, multi-defendant indictment demonstrates the jury was able to compartmentalize the evidence of various charges against various defendants), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burns v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F. 2d 43, 49 (CA1), cert. denied, 493 U. S. 862 (1989); United States v. Lara, 905 F. 2d 599, 602 (CA2 1990); United States v. Ryan, 866 F. 2d 604, 610 (CA3 1989); United States v. Chester, 919 F. 2d 896, 900 (CA4 1990); United States v. Rodriguez, 882 F. 2d 1059, 1067 (CA6 1989), cert. denied, 493 U. S. 1084 (1990); United States v. Williams, 901 F. 2d 1394, 1396 (CA7 1990), cert. pending, No. 90-5849; United States v. Whitehorse, 909 F. 2d 316, 318 (CA8 1990); United States v. Singleton, 917 F. 2d 411, 412 (CA9 1990); United States v. Dean, 908 F. 2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edgar Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edward W. Welch, Jr., United States of America v. Arline S. Welch, United States of America v. Kevin Cullinane, United States of America v. Cheryl T. Johnson, United States of America v. Richard F. Labrie, United States of America v. Tony Rood, United States of America v. William D. Wallace, United States of America v. Ernest F. Langlois
See, e.g., United States v. Osorio, 929 F.2d 753, 758 (1st Cir.1991); see also United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 47 (1st Cir.) (concluding, in an analogous context, that a defendant's cry of unfair surprise "is severely undermined, if not entirely undone, by his neglect to ask the district court for a continuance to meet the claimed exigency"), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sepulveda
See, e.g., United States v. Osorio, 929 F.2d 753, 758 (1st Cir.1991); see also United States v. Diaz-Villa-fane, 874 F.2d 43, 47 (1st Cir.) (concluding, in an analogous context, that a defendant’s cry of unfair surprise “is severely undermined, if not entirely undone, by his neglect to ask the district court for a continuance to meet the claimed exigency”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Claude Paul Tardiff
See, e.g., United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 47 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kelvin Harrington
(2×)
Compare United States v. Montenegro-Rojo, 908 F.2d 425, 429-30 (9th Cir.1990) (upward departure justified by defendant’s use of aliases, disciplinary problems while incarcerated and repeated misconduct on public trolley) and United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 50-52 (1st Cir.) (upholding sentence four times greater than Guideline range based on defendant’s status as important drug supplier, use of adolescent couriers, and other factors), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989) with United States v. Pozzy, 902 F.2d 133, 138-39 (1st Cir.) (reversing down…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moore
v.
Brown
v.
Brown
No. 89-5138.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
493 U.S. 862
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.