discussed Cited "see" Polewsky v. Bay Colony Railroad See Action Alliance of Senior Citizens v. Heckler, 789 F.2d 931, 942-43 (D.C.Cir.1986), vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 1329 , 108 L.Ed.2d 469 (1990) (Action to compel administrative action on proposed regulations submitted for review was mooted when defendants acted on all proposed regulations.

cited Cited "see" United States v. Schweitzer See, Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Philadelphia v. Bowen, 846 F.2d 1449 (D.C.Cir.1988), vacated and remanded, 494 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 1329 , 108 L.Ed.2d 469 (1990).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." James E. Akins v. Federal Election Commission (2×) Compare Scientists’ Inst. for Public Info., Inc. v. Atomic Energy Comm’n, 481 F.2d 1079 , 1086 n. 29 (D.C.Cir.1973) (the Atomic Energy Commission’s decision not to provide an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on a reactor program established Article III injury because the Institute’s main function was to distribute such information to the public), and Action Alliance of Senior Citizens v. Heckler, 789 F.2d 931, 937-38 (D.C.Cir.1986) (Article III injury where new government regulations restricting the availability of information on services for the élderly impaired AASC’s ability …