Guerrero v. United States, 494 U.S. 1082 (1990).

discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Baerga-Suárez v. United States

D.P.R. · 2014 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low

it is not enough merely to mention a possible argument in the most skeletal way, leaving the court to do counsel's work ... 'judges are not expected to be mind readers.

discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."

6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low

judges are not expected to be mindreaders. consequently, a litigant has an obligation "to spell out its arguments squarely and distinctly," or else forever hold its peace.

discussed Cited "see" Muhammad Rais v. Eric Holder, Jr.

6th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Elder, 90 F.3d 1110, 1118 (6th Cir.1996) (“[I]t is a ‘settled appellate rule that issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived.’”) (quoting United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1814 , 108 L.Ed.2d 944 (1990)).

discussed Cited "see" Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Jackson

D. Mass. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.1990) (“It is not enough merely to mention a possible argument in the most skeletal way, leaving the court to do counsel’s work.”), cert, denied, 494 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1814 , 108 L.Ed.2d 944 (1990).

cited Cited "see" Berkshire Medical Center, Inc. v. U.W. Marx, Inc.

1st Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1814 , 108 L.Ed.2d 944 (1990).

cited Cited "see" Tayag v. Lahey Clinic Hospital, Inc.

1st Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 494 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1814 , 108 L.Ed.2d 944 (1990).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Santiago-Vazquez (2×)

1st Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 (1990).

discussed Cited "see" Nollet v. Justices, Trial

1st Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.) (reciting that "issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived"), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 (1990).

discussed Cited "see" United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.) (noting the “settled appellate rule that issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived”), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1814 , 108 L.Ed.2d 944 (1990).

discussed Cited "see" Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.

8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See Oakley v. City of Longmont, 890 F.2d 1128, 1133 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1814 , 108 L.Ed.2d 944 (1990). 6 Scrutinizing the disputed language "in light of the entire legislative scheme" enacted by Congress, id. at 1132-33, the Tenth Circuit concluded that the statute "contemplates continuation coverage to remain available to the covered employee despite a spouse's preexisting insurance policy," id. at 1133.

discussed Cited "see" Noonan v. Rauh

1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.) ("issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived"), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 (1990). 8 trial testimony that the Rauhs always paid their household expenses from their joint accounts (i.e. the accounts were mere "convenience" accounts), and argues that her testimony conclusively rebutted any presumption that the Debtor intended to give Mrs. Rauh a beneficial interest in the deposited funds.

discussed Cited "see" Noonan v. Rauh

1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.) ("issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived”), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1814 , 108 L.Ed.2d 944 (1990). 5 .

discussed Cited "see" Bonnie L. Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.

8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See Oakley v. City of Longmont, 890 F.2d 1128, 1133 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1814 , 108 L.Ed.2d 944 (1990). 6 Scrutinizing the disputed language “in light of the entire legislative scheme” enacted by Congress, id. at 1132-33, the Tenth Circuit concluded that the statute “contemplates continuation coverage to remain available to the covered employee despite a spouse’s preexisting insurance policy,” id. at 1133.

discussed Cited "see" Kerrigan v. Commissioner

1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. ___ _____________ Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.) ("[I]issues adverted to in _______ a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived."), cert. denied, ____________ 494 U.S. 1082 (1990).

discussed Cited "see" Kerrigan v. Commissioner

1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.) ("[I]issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived."), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 (1990). 2 Dismissed in part; affirmed in part.

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Hardy