green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cawthorn v. Circosta
See South Carolina, 720 F.3d at 527 (“We have also drawn a distinction between the commencement of ‘formal enforcement proceedings,’ at which point Younger applies, versus the period of time when there is only a ‘threat of enforcement,’ when Younger does not apply.”) (quoting Telco Commc’ns, Inc. v. Carbaugh, 885 F.2d 1225 , 1229 (4th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mazerolle v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
See Carlson v. General Motors, 883 F.2d 287 , 294-96 (4th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 , 910 (1990) (although unconscionability is an issue of law, § 2-302 provides that parties are entitled to offer evidence if unconscionability is adequately alleged).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Air Bag Products Liability Litigation
See Carlson v. General Motors Corp., 883 F.2d 287, 297 (4th Cir.1989) (“Cars are designed to provide transportation.”), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 , 110 S.Ct. 1923 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990); Taterka v. Ford Motor Co., 86 Wis.2d 140 , 271 N.W.2d 653, 655 (1978) (“The ordinary purpose for which a car is intended is to provide transportation.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Embery Jackson McBride v. Bob Sharpe, Warden, Dodge Correctional Institution
See Endress v. Dugger, 880 F.2d 1244, 1249 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 , 110 S.Ct. 1923 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anton/Bauer, Inc. v. Energex Systems Corp.
See Carlson v. G.M.C., 883 F.2d 287 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied 495 U.S. 904 , 910, 110 S.Ct. 1923 , 1936, 109 L.Ed.2d 287 , 299 (1990); Martin v. Joseph Harris Co., 767 F.2d 296 (6th Cir. 1985); State v. G.M.C., 120 Misc.2d 371 , 466 N.Y.S.2d 124 (Sup.Ct.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
210 East 86th Street Corp. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
See Carlson v. GM Corp., 883 F.2d 287 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied 495 U.S. 904 , 110 S.Ct. 1923 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990); Martin v. Joseph Harris Co., 767 F.2d 296 (6th Cir.1985); State v. GMC, 120 Misc.2d 371 , 466 N.Y.S.2d 124 (Sup.Ct.1983); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 551 (1979). 6 .Where extremely large retroactive financial burdens were imposed for nonpayment of overtime for time spent reaching a work site after entry onto the employer’s premises, Congress acted to block further impositions of such liability, a step upheld in Battaglia v. General Motors, 169 F.2d 254 (2d Cir.), ce…
discussed
Cited "see"
Independence Public Media of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network Commission
See Standard Alaska Production Co. v. Schaible, 874 F.2d 624, 629 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 , 110 S.Ct. 1923 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990) (bias exception inapplicable when plaintiff fails to utilize disqualification procedures). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sonia Jacobs A/K/A Sonia Linder v. Harry K. Singletary, Marta Villacorta and Jim Smith
The police subject a person to the functional equivalent of interrogation when they engage in conduct that they "should know [is] reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.” Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 301 , 100 S.Ct. 1682, 1689 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1979); see Endress v. Dugger, 880 F.2d 1244, 1249 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 , 110 S.Ct. 1923 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stokes v. Singletary
Therefore, the voluntariness of a confession is a legal conclusion to which the presumption of correctness does not attach. 21 In contrast, a presumption of correctness is accorded to factual findings of state trial and appellate courts following a hearing on the factual issues and an "adequate written indicia" of the factual determinations, "unless one of the conditions set forth in Section 2254(d)(1)-(7) is found to exist ... or unless the state-court determination is 'not fairly supported by the record.....' " 8 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d); Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940, 946 (11th Cir.) (quoting 28…
discussed
Cited "see"
Stokes v. Singletary
In contrast, a presumption of correctness is accorded to factual findings of state trial and appellate courts following a hearing on the factual issues and an “adequate written indicia” of the factual determinations, “unless one of the conditions set forth in Section 2254(d)(1) — (7) is found to exist ... or unless the state-court determination is ‘not fairly supported by the record.”’ 8 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d); Hance v. Zant, 696 F.2d 940, 946 (11th Cir.) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(8)), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 3544 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1393 (1983), overruled on other g…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nichols
(2×)
The question under Chapman , in that context, is not whether the legally admitted evidence was sufficient to support the death sentence, but rather, whether the State has proven “beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained.” Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249, 258-59 , 108 S.Ct. 1792, 1798-99 , 100 L.Ed.2d 284 (1988) (quoting Chapman, 386 U.S. at 24 , 87 S.Ct. at 828 ); see also State v. Cauthem, 778 S.W.2d 39 , 47 n. 1 (1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 , 110 S.Ct. 1922 , 109 L.Ed.2d 286 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Withrow v. Williams
See, e.g., Endress v. Dugger, 880 F. 2d 1244, 1246-1250 (CA11 1989) (defendant volunteered information without questioning), cert. denied, 495 U. S. 904 (1990); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patrick McBride and Sonya McBride v. Dwight Coleman, Lester Crowsheart, Sharon Crowsheart, Russel Folmer, Anna Mae Folmer, George Hatfield, June Hatfield, Donna McCabe Diane McCabe on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Gary A. Barrett, Rosemary K. Barrett, Richard L. Harmon, Betty J. Harmon, Larry L. Robertson, Nancy K. Robertson, Ross Wade and Maureen Wade v. Clayton Yeutter, Secretary of Agriculture, Charles W. Shuman, Administrator of the Farmers Home Administration, Ralph W. Leet, State Director of the Farmers Home Administration Harold T. Aasmundstad, Glen W. Binegar, Allen G. Drege, Dennis W. Larson, Odell O. Ottmar, and Joseph J. Schneider, as District Directors of the Farmers Home Administration of North Dakota Samuel Delvo, Lorace Hakanson, Larry Leier, Charles Schaefer and James Well as County Supervisors of the Farmers Home Administration in North Dakota, David Marshall, Dwight Sewell and Steve Taylor
See Hartman v. Lyng, 884 F.2d 1103, 1106 (8th Cir.1989) (reviewing a contempt holding by an abuse of discretion standard); see also Davis v. Bowen, 894 F.2d 271, 272 (8th Cir.1989) ("Our review of the denial of a contempt motion is limited to determining whether the district court abused its discretion."), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 , 110 S.Ct. 1922 , 109 L.Ed.2d 286 (1990). 23 On February 16, 1984, the McBrides met with Taylor.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McBride v. Coleman
See Hartman v. Lyng, 884 F.2d 1103, 1106 (8th Cir.1989) (reviewing a contempt holding by an abuse of discretion standard); see also Davis v. Bowen, 894 F.2d 271, 272 (8th Cir.1989) (“Our review of the denial of a contempt motion is limited to determining whether the district court abused its discretion.”), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 , 110 S.Ct. 1922 , 109 L.Ed.2d 286 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.
v.
Baily, Attorney General of Alaska
v.
Baily, Attorney General of Alaska
No. 89-1375.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 23, 1990.
495 U.S. 904
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.