green
Positive treatment
13.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Edwards
See State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 631 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 430-31 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
King v. JCS Enterprises, Inc.
Hourly Rate A reasonable hourly rate is one that is consistent with the “prevailing market rates in the relevant community,” that is, what similarly skilled attorneys in the area would charge for similar work. 8 Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 , 895 & n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1541 , 79 L.Ed.2d 891 (1984); see Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053, 1058-59 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990); Cohen v. West Haven Board of Police Comm’rs, 638 F.2d 496 , 506 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Garcia
(2×)
See Greene, 351 N.C. at 567 , 528 S.E.2d at 579 ("`The conflicting answers given by these prospective jurors illustrate clearly the United States Supreme Court's conclusion that a prospective juror's bias may, in some instances, not be provable with unmistakable clarity.'") (quoting State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 624 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 426 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Roache
See State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 628 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 429 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ward
(2×)
The test for determining whether a prospective juror's views on capital punishment may properly serve as the basis of a challenge for cause is whether such views would "`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" State v. Syriani, 333 N.C. 350, 369 , 428 S.E.2d 118, 128 (quoting Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841, 851-52 (1985)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 948 , 114 S.Ct. 392 , 126 L.Ed.2d 341 (1993); accord State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), ce…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Taylor
Ed. 2d 169 (1995)); accord State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 624 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 426 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue v. Chase Manhattan Bank
See Bizcap v. Olive, 892 F.2d 1163 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
I.B.E.W Local No. 910 Welfare, Annuity, & Pension Funds Ex Rel. Love v. Dexelectrics, Inc.
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053, 1058-59 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990); Onondaga County, 1992 WL 75051 , at *6.
discussed
Cited "see"
L.I. Head Start Child Development Services, Inc. v. Kearse
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 815 F.2d 869, 872 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990); Pagovich v. Moskow-itz, 865 F.Supp. 130, 139 (S.D.N.Y.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
LI HEAD START CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERV. v. Kearse
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 815 F.2d 869, 872 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990); Pagovich v. Moskowitz, 865 F.Supp. 130, 139 (S.D.N.Y.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
CENTEX-ROONEY CONST. CO. v. Martin County
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053, 1057-58 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Billings
Ed. 2d 581, 589 (1980)); accord State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert, denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Stephens
Ed. 2d 581, 589 (1980)); accord State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6651, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,897 United States of America v. Marvin Henson, United States of America v. Bruce L. Suiters
See United States v. Laykin, 886 F.2d 1534, 1542 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2586 , 110 L.Ed.2d 267 (1990) (reasoning that overt acts listed in indictment provided sufficient information for the defendant to prepare a defense).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Perkins
(2×)
Ed. 2d 581,589 (1980)); accord State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Berry v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilkinson
Ed. 2d 547 (1994); accord State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rowsey
(2×)
Ed. 2d 581, 589 (1980)); accord State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Ralph Archer
See United States v. Laykin, 886 F.2d 1534 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 (1990) (open-ended indictment not defective because it listed overt acts).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sikorski v. Sikorski
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 815 F.2d 869, 872 (2d Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990); Pagovich v. Moskowitz, 865 F.Supp. 130, 139 (S.D.N.Y.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louise Han PEREZ; Joseph E. Perez; And John Velasco Cruz, Defendants-Appellants
See United States v. Laykin, 886 F.2d 1584 , 1542 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2586 , 110 L.Ed.2d 267 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Alliance Insurance v. Eagle Insurance
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 697 F.Supp. 642 , 644—45 (S.D.N.Y.1988), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 885 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smart
See State v. Lonergan, 16 Conn. App. 358 , 548 A.2d 718 (1988), aff'd, 213 Conn. 74 , 566 A.2d 677 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S. Ct. 2586 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Conaway
Ed. 2d 581, 589 (1980)); accord State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
People of the Territory of Guam v. Juan Mafnas Atoigue
See United States v. Laykin, 886 F.2d 1534, 1543 (9th Cir.1989) (dates of conspiracy), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kent Harper
Sec. 1709-2 ; see United States v. Laykin, 886 F.2d 1534, 1537 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2586 , 110 L.Ed.2d 267 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Skipper
(2×)
The standard for determining whether a prospective juror may be properly excused for cause for his views on capital punishment is whether those views would "prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath." State v. Syriani, 333 N.C. 350, 369 , 428 S.E.2d 118, 128 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 392 , 126 L.Ed.2d 341 (1993), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 745 , 126 L.Ed.2d 707 (1994); accord State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jibson v. Michigan Education Association-Nea
See Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Ass'n-MEA-NEA, 707 F.Supp. 1473 (W.D.Mich.1988), further proceedings, 707 F.Supp. 1482 (W.D.Mich.1988), and 707 F.Supp. 1490 (W.D.Mich.1989) ("Lehnert I "), aff'd, 893 F.2d 111 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2586 , 110 L.Ed.2d 267 (1990). 2 9 The MEA procedure--which is reprinted as an appendix to the district court's opinion in Lehnert I, 707 F.Supp. at 1496-98--sets forth a comprehensive system for the collection of service fees from nonmember employees who are represented by local associations affiliated with MEA.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sexton
Ed. 2d 841, 851-52 (1985); accord, State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Green
Ed. 2d 841, 851-52 (1985); accord, e.g., State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Felix-Rodriguez
See id. (indictment did not allege overt acts conducted in furtherance of conspiracy). 23 In United States v. Laykin, 886 F.2d 1534 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 (1990), we held that an indictment was not fatally defective, even though it contained open-ended dates, because it listed eighteen overt acts which limited the time frame covered by the indictment and gave the defendants notice of the scope of charges against them.
examined
Cited "see"
Martin Trowery v. United States
(3×)
See United States v. Laykin, 886 F.2d 1534, 1542 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 (1990). 9 Here, the indictment charged Trowery with a conspiracy beginning on a date unknown to the grand jury, and ending on or about January 27, 1897.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Adams
(2×)
Supp.1985); see State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 617-18 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 423 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990); State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 477-78 , 356 S.E.2d 279, 293 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 918 , 108 S.Ct. 269 , 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987); State v. McDougall, 308 N.C. 1, 9 , 301 S.E.2d 308, 314 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 197 , 78 L.Ed.2d 173 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gibbs
Ed. 2d 841, 851-52 (1985); accord, State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sawyer
See State v. Lonergan, 213 Conn. 74 , 566 A.2d 677 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S. Ct. 2586 , 110 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Louis Washington
See United States v. Quintero, 872 F.2d 107 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2586 , 110 L.Ed.2d 267 (1990); United States v. Lowe, 860 F.2d 1370 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1005 , 109 S.Ct. 1639 , 104 L.Ed.2d 155 (1989); United States v. Pirovolos, 844 F.2d 415 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jennings
(2×)
The test for determining whether a prospective juror may be properly excused for cause for his views on the death penalty is whether those views would "prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath." Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct. 844, 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841, 851-52 (1985); accord, e.g., State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 *195 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ositadima Igbo, and Phillip Chukwurah
See United States v. Laykin, 886 F.2d 1534, 1542 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Raymond
See State v. Lonergan, 16 Conn. App. 358, 363-64 , 548 A.2d 718 (1988), aff’d, 213 Conn. 74 , 566 A.2d 677 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S. Ct. 2586 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Syriani
Ed. 2d 841, 851-52 (1985); accord, State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 621-22 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 425 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , *370 110 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Huntington Branch, National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Town of Huntington
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053, 1060 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Huntington Branch, National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People v. Town Of Huntington
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053, 1060 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dunn
See State v. Lonergan, 213 Conn. 74 , 566 A.2d 677 (1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S. Ct. 2586 , 110 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kimmel v. State of New York
Co., Inc., 526 F Supp 1324, 1327-1328 [1981]; see also Chambless v Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F2d 1053, 1059 [1989], cert denied 496 US 905 [1990]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. United States Currency in the Sum of Six Hundred Sixty Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars
Under the "lodestar” method, attorneys' fees are determined by taking "the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 433 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 ; see also Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kingvision Pay-Per-View Ltd. v. Lalaleo
Under the “lodestar” method, attorney fees are determined by taking “the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation [multiplied] by a reasonable hourly rate.” Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983); see also Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053, 1058-59 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tlacoapa v. Carregal
See, e.g., Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053, 1058-59 (2d Cir.1989) (noting that the size of an attorney’s firm is relevant in determining the relevant community’s “prevailing market rates” and that “smaller firms may be subject to their own prevailing market rate”), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990); Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc., 891 F.Supp. 875, 895 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (“If the movant is represented by a small or medium-size firm, the appropriate rates are those typically charged by such firms, whereas a …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.
See also Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 885 F.2d 1053 , 1058 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 2587 , 110 L.Ed.2d 268 (1990) (stating that “the Supreme Court instructs us that the same standards apply to other fee-shifting statutes where an award is made to the prevailing party”) (citing Hensley, 461 U.S. at 433 n. 7, 103 S.Ct. 1933 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nobles
Ed. 2d 935 (1988); see also State v. Davis, 325 N.C. 607, 628 , 386 S.E.2d 418, 429 (1989) (ascertaining no abuse of discretion in judge’s decision to replace juror who had child-care problems, after both parties had presented all their evidence in guilt-innocence phase), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 , 110 L.
Carter
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-7307.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1990.
496 U.S. 905
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.