green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Urbino v. Pan American Life Insurance
without a remedy, the availability of a federal remedy is not a prerequisite for federal pre 1561 emption
cited
Cited "see"
Krawczyk v. Harnischfeger Corp.
See Lister v. Stark, 890 F.2d 941, 946 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1011 , 111 S.Ct. 579 , 112 L.Ed.2d 584 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Jacob v. SmithKline Beecham
See Lister v. Stark, 890 F.2d 941, 943, n. 1 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1011 , 111 S.Ct. 579 , 112 L.Ed.2d 584 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sandler v. Marconi Circuit Technology Corp.
See Lister v. Stark, 890 F.2d 941, 946 (7th Cir.1989) (affirming dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) because “ERISA does not recognize the validity of an oral modification of a pension plan”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1011 , 111 S.Ct. 579 , 112 L.Ed.2d 584 (1990); Cefalu v. B.F.
cited
Cited "see"
Barkdoll v. H & W Motor Express Co.
See Lister v. Stark, 890 F.2d 941, 945 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1011 , 111 S.Ct. 579 , 112 L.Ed.2d 584 (1990) (Seventh Circuit declines to follow Green-blatt).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington v. Humana Health Plan, Inc.
See, e.g., Lister v. Stark, 890 F.2d 941 , 943-44 & n. 1 (7th Cir 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1011 , 111 S.Ct. 579 , 112 L.Ed.2d 584 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Snyder v. Elliot W. Dann Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Lister v. Stark, 890 F.2d 941, 946 (7th Cir.1989) (“ERISA does not recognize the validity of an oral modification of a pension plan[.]”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1011 , 111 S.Ct. 579 , 112 L.Ed.2d 584 (1990); Degan v. Ford Motor Co., 869 F.2d 889, 895 (5th Cir.1989) (“ERISA precludes oral modifications to benefit plans and [] claims of promissory estoppel are not cognizable in suits seeking to enforce rights to pension benefits.”); Musto v. American Gen.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sheriff v. Steward
See United States v. Acosta, 963 F.2d 551, 554-55 (2nd Cir. 1992) (creme liqueur in which cocaine was transported not included because cocaine was not marketable unless separated from creme liqueur); United States v. Rolande-Gabriel, 938 F.2d 1231, 1234, 1237 (11th Cir. 1991) (liquid in which cocaine transported not included because cocaine not marketable unless extracted from liquid); Sheriff v. Hughes, 99 Nev. 541, 542-43 , 665 P.2d 242, 243 (1983) (cut used to dilute heroin included because heroin marketed this way); see also Chapman v. United States, 498 U.S. 1011 , 111 S.Ct. 1919, 1926 (1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Air Line Pilots Assn., International
v.
O'Neill
v.
O'Neill
No. 89-1493.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 10, 1990.
498 U.S. 1011
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Florida (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 806.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument denied.