Price v. North Carolina, 498 U.S. 802 (1990). · Go Syfert
Price v. North Carolina, 498 U.S. 802 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
82 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Rollins (ncctapp, 2012-05-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Rollins
N.C. Ct. App. · 2012 · confidence medium
I have already instructed you that your recommendation must be unanimous, that is, each of you must agree on the recommendation.’ ” Id. at 90, 388 S.E.2d at 104 .
discussed Cited "see" State of Minnesota v. Hugh Alexander Larson
Minn. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Larson, 453 N.W.2d 42 , 47–48 (Minn. 1990) (Larson I) (holding that out-of-court statement of identification by preschool-aged victim of sexual abuse was “independently admissible” under medical- diagnosis exception), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 801 , 111 S. Ct. 29 (1990).3 A child’s statements to medical personnel “are admissible [under the medical-diagnosis exception] only if the evidence suggests that the child knew she was speaking to medical personnel and that it was important she tell the truth.” State v. Salazar, 504 N.W.2d 774, 777 (Minn. 1993).
examined Cited "see" State v. Lopez (3×)
N.C. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56, 83 , 388 S.E.2d 84, 99 , sentence vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 802 , 111 S.Ct. 29 , 112 L.Ed.2d 7 (1990) cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1124 , 115 S.Ct. 1993 , 131 L.Ed.2d 879 (1995)("[C]ounsel's argument should not be impaired without good reason....").
examined Cited "see" State v. Haselden (3×)
N.C. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56, 83 , 388 S.E.2d 84, 99-100 , sentence vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 802 , 112 L.
examined Cited "see" Price v. North Carolina (3×)
SCOTUS · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See 498 U.S. 802 , 111 S.Ct. 29 , 112 L.Ed.2d 7 (1990) (vacated and remanded in light of McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U.S. 433 , 110 S.Ct. 1227 , 108 L.Ed.2d 369 (1990)); 506 U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 955 , 122 L.Ed.2d 113 (vacated and remanded in light of Morgan v. Illinois, 501 U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 2222 , 119 L.Ed.2d 492 (1992)).
cited Cited "see" State v. Yelverton
unknown court · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56, 69 , 388 S.E.2d 84, 91 , judgment vacated on other grounds and remanded, 498 U.S. 802 , 112 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Oslund
Minn. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Larson, 453 N.W.2d 42, 45-46 (Minn.), cert. granted and judgment vacated, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 29 , 112 L.Ed.2d 7 (1990) (remanded for reconsideration in light of Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 3139 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990)). 2 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Prevatte
N.C. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
App. P. 10(c)(1); see also State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56, 87 , 388 S.E.2d 84, 101-02 , sentence vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 802 , 112 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gianakos (2×)
Minn. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 514 N.W.2d 551, 553-54 (Minn.1994) (stating that "[d]etermination of procedural matters is a judicial function."); State v. Willis, 332 N.W.2d 180, 184 (Minn.1983) (noting that the court has inherent authority to establish the rules of evidence); see also State v. Larson, 453 N.W.2d 42 , 46 n. 3 (Minn.1990) (opposing the lower courts' characterization of the legislature as the "primary regulator of evidentiary matters"), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 801 , 111 S.Ct. 29 , 112 L.Ed.2d 7 (1990); State v. Leecy, 294 N.W.2d 280, 283 (Minn.1980) (observing that the …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. McDowell
N.C. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985), the United States Supreme Court held that a prospective juror may be removed for cause due to *209 his views about the death penalty if those views would "`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Id. at 424 , 105 S.Ct. at 852 , 83 L.Ed.2d at 851 (quoting Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 45 , 100 S.Ct. 2521, 2526 , 65 L.Ed.2d 581, 589 (1980)); see also State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56 , 388 S.E.2d 84 , vacated on other grounds, ___ U.S. ___, 11…
Price
v.
North Carolina
No. 90-5045.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
498 U.S. 802
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published

Sup. Ct. N. C. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U. S. 433 (1990).