green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.9 score
“appellate determination of sufficiency must be constrained by trial court's instructions; 'otherwise . . . would be sustaining a conviction on appeal on a theory upon which the jury not instructed below”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Pfeiffer
appellate determination of sufficiency must be constrained by trial court's instructions; 'otherwise . . . would be sustaining a conviction on appeal on a theory upon which the jury not instructed below
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holmes
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1190-92 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S. Ct. 130 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Julio-Cardales
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1208 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 *557 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher D. MacKey
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1190 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Classic Communications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
See Oberndorf v. City & County of Denver, 900 F.2d 1434, 1440 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 129 , 112 L.Ed.2d 97 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carter v. United States
(2×)
However, “[e]very court of appeals which has considered the question [of court granted immunity] has rejected the Third Circuit’s Smith holding as being a violation of the doctrine of separation of powers.” Capozzi, supra, 883 F.2d at 614 (citing cases); accord United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1191 (1st Cir.) (“[t]his theory has been rejected by virtually every other court that has considered the issue” (citing cases)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990). 2 y.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Haworth
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1180 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990); United States v. Coiro, 922 F.2d 1008, 1017 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2826 , 115 L.Ed.2d 996 (1991); United States v. Woods, 915 F.2d 854, 863-64 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947 , 111 S.Ct. 1413 , 113 L.Ed.2d 466 (1991); United States v. Bennett, 984 F.2d 597, 606-07 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 945 , 113 S.Ct. 2428 , 124 L.Ed.2d 649 (1993); United States v. Krout, 66 F.3d 1420, 1432 (5th Cir.1995); United States v. Glecier, …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angiulo
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169 (1st ___ _____________ _______ Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990). _____ ______ On December 18, 1990, the appellants filed substantially identical motions for sentence reduction in the district court.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Angiulo
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1195 (1st Cir.) (collecting cases in which we have denied severance despite “sharply antagonistic defense theories”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990). “[T]he tension between defenses must be so great that a jury would have to believe one defendant at the expense of the other.” Yefsky, 994 F.2d at 897 (citing United States v. Arruda, 715 F.2d 671, 679 (1st Cir.1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
Zannino v. United States
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1176, 1216 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Cedric Renfroe
See United States v. Portac, Inc., 869 F.2d 1288, 1295 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990) (holding that the district court enjoys great latitude in deciding whether to grant the jury's readback request).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ortiz v. Dubois
(2×)
We have recognized, consistent with Cole, that "[a]n appellate court may not lawfully sustain a conviction on a theory entirely different from the theory upon which the jury was charged." United States v. Gomes, 969 F.2d 1290, 1295 (1st Cir.1992); see United States v. Anguilo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1197 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990). 53 An appellate court may not go outside of the prosecution's trial theory to affirm a conviction because a criminal defendant must have notice of the charges against him and an opportunity to be heard in a trial on the is…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ortiz v. Dubois
The Supreme ___ Court found that the defendants "were clearly tried and convicted by the jury for promoting an unlawful assemblage made an offense by 2, and were not tried for the offense of using force and violence as described in 1." Id. at 199 . ___ The Court added that, "without completely ignoring the judge's charge, the jury could not have convicted petitioners for having committed the separate, distinct, and ____________________ 7In effect, on this claim appellant argues that the jury instructions were not defective, but rather, embodied a valid theory of felony-murder which did not req…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brandon
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1201-02 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990). -79- with the possibility of providing curative instructions because "instructions would only magnify the problem." Under these circumstances, we do not think that the trial court's actions constitute reversible error despite the possible inappropriateness of the testimony.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brandon
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 ___ _____________ _______ F.2d 1169, 1201-02 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990). ____ ______ -79- with the possibility of providing curative instructions because "instructions would only magnify the problem." Under these circumstances, we do not think that the trial court's actions constitute reversible error despite the possible inappropriateness of the testimony.
cited
Cited "see"
KRW Sales, Inc. v. Kristel Corp.
See Triad Assoc., Inc. v. Chicago Housing Authority, 892 F.2d 583 , 586 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 129 , 112 L.Ed.2d 97 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brandon
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1201-02 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Brandon, United States of America v. Charles D. Gauvin, United States of America v. Marvin Granoff, United States of America v. Ronald R. Hagopian, United States of America v. Momi A. Kumalae, United States of America v. Owen B. Landman, United States of America v. Norman D. Reisch, United States of America v. John Ward
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1201-02 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990) 65 There is also sufficient testimony, quite apart from the disputed comment, that Landman agreed to look after Reisch's interests.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. De La Cruz
See United States ___ _____________ v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1191 (1st Cir.) (collecting _______ cases), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Efrain De La Cruz, United States v. Luis Torres
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1191 (1st Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. De La Cruz
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1191 (1st Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990).
examined
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Angiulo
(4×)
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1176 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Moreno, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1197 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams-Davis
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1185 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patriarca
See United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990); United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1814 , 108 L.Ed.2d 944 (1990); United States v. Angiulo, 847 F.2d 956 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 138 , 102 L.Ed.2d 110 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Philip Chism
See also United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1181 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990) (no presumption of prejudice despite frequent characterization of defendant as mafia crime boss).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stevens
The Fifth Circuit analyzed the appellant’s challenge, explaining the burden placed on him: In bringing his constitutional contention to us, Fryar is apparently overlooking the principle that “outside the First Amendment context, a party has standing to raise a vagueness challenge only insofar as the statute is vague as applied to his or her specific conduct.” United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1104 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2010 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); see also United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1179 (1st Cir.1990) (in absence of First Amendment…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Feaster
See also United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1192 (1st Cir.) (noting that when prosecution "intimidate[s] or harass[es] potential defense witnesses to discourage them from testifying — for example, by threatening them with prosecution for perjury or other offenses” and witness consequently refuses to testify for defendant, "a court may order the prosecutor to grant immunity to the witness or face a judgment of acquittal”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990); United States v. Patterson, 819 F.2d 1495, 1506 (9th Cir.1987) (noting that ”[i]f a prima fa…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Jesse Ramirez
Id.; see also United States v. Portac, Inc., 869 F.2d 1288, 1294 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied by Wolf v. United States, 498 U.S. 845 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cuevas-Burgos v. United States
See, e.g., United ___ ____ ______ States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1181-83 (1st Cir.), cert. _________________ _____ denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990); United States v. Moreno Morales, ______ _______________________________ 815 F.2d 725, 730-36 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 966 ____________ (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cuevas-Burgos v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1181-83 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990); United States v. Moreno Morales, 815 F.2d 725, 730-36 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 966 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edgar Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edward W. Welch, Jr., United States of America v. Arline S. Welch, United States of America v. Kevin Cullinane, United States of America v. Cheryl T. Johnson, United States of America v. Richard F. Labrie, United States of America v. Tony Rood, United States of America v. William D. Wallace, United States of America v. Ernest F. Langlois
See, e.g., United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1188-89 (1st Cir.) (allowing veteran FBI agent to offer opinions, based mainly on information presented at trial, about defendants' roles in gambling ring), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990); Ladd, 885 F.2d at 959 (allowing experienced police officer to testify about methods of packaging and processing heroin, and relationship to distribution venture); United States v. Angiulo, 847 F.2d 956, 973-75 (1st Cir.) (allowing suitably credentialed agent to offer expert opinions about structure and operation of La Cos…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sepulveda
See, e.g., United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1188-89 (1st Cir.) (allowing veteran FBI agent to offer opinions, based mainly on information presented at trial, about defendants’ roles in gambling ring), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 130 , 112 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990); Ladd, 885 F.2d at 959 (allowing experienced police officer to testify about methods of packaging and processing heroin, and relationship to distribution venture); United States v. Angiulo, 847 F.2d 956, 973-75 (1st Cir.) (allowing suitably credentialed agent to offer expert opinions about structure and operation of La C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Computer Associates International, Inc. v. American Fundware, Inc.
Under this doctrine, “[those who petition government for redress are generally immune from antitrust liability.” Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc., — U.S. at-, 113 S.Ct. at 1926 ; see also Oberndorf v. City & County of Denver, 900 F.2d 1434, 1440 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 , 111 S.Ct. 129 , 112 L.Ed.2d 97 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Linton
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 89-7876.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
498 U.S. 845
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.