green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.2 score
G Cite
cited 7× by 3 distinct cases ·
"Columbia Gas II "
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
columbia gas ii
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. FERC, 895 F.2d 791 , 797 (D.C.Cir.) ("Columbia II"), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 907 , 111 S.Ct. 279 , 112 L.Ed.2d 233 (1990) (‘‘[W]e have found no support for the Commission’s contention that ... it has the authority ... to waive the filed rate doctrine.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafael Alvarez Pena
See United States v. Dyer, 910 F.2d 530, 533 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 907 , 111 S.Ct. 276 , 112 L.Ed.2d 232 (1990), and 498 U.S. 949 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Util. L. Rep. P 14,056 Northwest Pipeline Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, Northwest Natural Gas Company, Intervenors. Northwest Pipeline Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Section 5, therefore, simply finds no application in this case. 49 Nor do we accept Northwest's argument that the Commission's refund order violates the filed rate doctrine. 14 "The filed rate doctrine simply does not extend to cases in which buyers are on adequate notice that resolution of some specific issue may cause a later adjustment to the rate being collected at the time of service." Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. F.E.R.C., 965 F.2d 1066 , 1075 (D.C.Cir.1992); see Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. F.E.R.C., 895 F.2d 791 , 797 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 907 , 111 S.Ct. 278 , 279, …
discussed
Cited "see"
Northwest Pipeline Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Nor do we accept Northwest’s argument that the Commission’s refund order violates the filed rate doctrine. 14 “The filed rate doctrine simply does not extend to cases in which buyers are on adequate notice that resolution of some specific issue may cause a later adjustment to the rate being collected at the time of service.” Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. F.E.R.C., 965 F.2d 1066 , 1075 (D.C.Cir.1992); see Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. F.E.R.C., 895 F.2d 791 , 797 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 907 , 111 S.Ct. 278 , 279, 112 L.Ed.2d 233 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Columbia Gas Systems Inc.
See Associated Gas Distribs. v. FERC, 893 F.2d 349, 355 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 907 , 111 S.Ct. 277 , 112 L.Ed.2d 232 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Columbia Gas Systems Inc. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Columbia Gas Systems Inc. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Thomas E. Ross, Trustee, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Intervenor-Defendant, Meridian Oil Production Inc. (\Meridian Oil\")
See Associated Gas Distribs. v. FERC, 893 F.2d 349, 355 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 907 , 111 S.Ct. 277 , 112 L.Ed.2d 232 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Giles
v.
Green, Warden
v.
Green, Warden
No. 90-5696.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1990.
498 U.S. 907
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.