green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
9.3 score
“because only a fraction of financial deterioration reflect fraud, investors must point to some facts suggesting that the difference is attributable to fraud”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Renz v. Schreiber
But see Trump, 793 F.Supp. at 557 (stating that “[w]hile we are instructed to draw all reasonable inferences in favor of a complainant, we concur with the reasoning of DiLeo [v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990) ], that no reasonable inferences of fraud can be drawn from conclusory allegations devoid of factual basis”).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
E.W. Wylie Corp. v. Montgomery (In Re Montgomery)
ircumstances' must be pleaded in detail. this means the who, what, when, where, and how: the first paragraph of any newspaper story.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jakobe v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.
because only a fraction of financial deterioration reflect fraud, investors must point to some facts suggesting that the difference is attributable to fraud
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities Litigation
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
he complaint ... must afford a basis for believing that plaintiffs could prove scienter.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Decker v. Glenfed, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
he complaint ... must afford a basis for believing that plaintiffs could prove scienter.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Melder v. Morris
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
fees for two years' audits could not approach the losses e w would suffer from a perception that it would muffle a client's fraud.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Lit.
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 628 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca6 1997
See Bailey Farms, Inc. v. NOR-AM Chemical Co., 27 F.3d 188, 191 (6th Cir.1994) ("[t]o the extent that the state supreme court had not yet addressed the issue presented, it is our duty to anticipate how that court would rule") (citing Mahne v. Ford Motor Co., 900 F.2d 83, 87 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 349 , 112 L.Ed.2d 313 (1990)). 49 We believe the Tennessee Supreme Court, if faced with the facts of the plaintiffs' case, would require a showing of actual reliance as a condition of recovery for common law fraud or negligent misrepresentation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.
See Bailey Farms, Inc. v. NOR-AM Chemical Co., 27 F.3d 188, 191 (6th Cir.1994) (“[t]o the extent that the state supreme court had not yet addressed the issue presented, it is our duty to anticipate how that court would rule”) (citing Mahne v. Ford Motor Co., 900 F.2d 83, 87 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 349 , 112 L.Ed.2d 313 (1990)).
cited
Cited "see"
Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co.
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 628 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
ca10 1996
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 628 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Holland
See Mahne v. Ford Motor Co., 900 F.2d 83, 86 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 349 , 112 L.Ed.2d 313 (1990). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. ex rel. Hall v. Tribal Development Corp.
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 626 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990) 6 Contrast this with the typical citizens' suit provision such as the one at issue in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992), which provided, in pertinent part, that " 'any person may commence a civil suit on his own behalf (A) to enjoin any person, including the United States and any other governmental instrumentality or agency ... who is alleged to be in violation of any provision of this chapter.' " Lujan, 504 U.S. at 5…
cited
Cited "see"
Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.
Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 470 (2d Cir.1978); see DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627-28 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Acito v. Imcera Group
Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 470 (2d Cir.1978); see DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627-28 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Weisburgh v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Hall v. Tribal Development Corp.
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 626 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990). .
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. Comptronix Corp.
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 629-30 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Borow v. nVIEW Corp.
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990); Dubowski v. Dominion Bankshares Corp., 763 F.Supp. 169 (W.D.Va.1991) (though plaintiffs do not have to plead their evidence, they must do more than contrast quarterly and yearly statements presented over a two-year period). 7 Because only a fraction of financial deteriorations are the result of fraud, plaintiffs must allege facts indicating that the change in circumstances resulted from defendants’ fraudulent scheme.' DiLeo, 901 F.2d at 627 ; Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Westinghouse Securities Litigation
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Westinghouse Securities Litigation
See Dileo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990); cf. Seville Industrial Machinery, 742 F.2d at 791 (allegations of “date, place or time” fulfill the requirements of Rule 9(b)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Urcarco Securities Litigation
See DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990) ("The story in this complaint is familiar in securities litigation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Danbom v. Prewitt (In re Prewitt)
See also DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990) (although states of mind may be pleaded generally, the circumstances or the “who, what, when, where, and how” must be pleaded in detail).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marrari v. Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.
Lit., 89 F.Supp.2d 1326, 1338 (S.D.Fla.1999); see also DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 629 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990) (stating that pleading with particularity “[m]eans the who, what, when, where, and how: the first paragraph of any newspaper story.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opn. No.
No. 7147; see also Matter of Greene v. Town Board, Town of Warrensburg , 159 A.D.2d 781 (3d Dep't) ("Town Law § 81 provides a vehicle for citizens to have specified issues submitted for referendum."), appeal dismissed , 76 N.Y.2d 771 , cert. denied , 498 U.S. 941 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Florida State Board of Administration v. Green Tree Financial Corp.
See, e.g., DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990); Weisburgh, 158 F.R.D. at 641 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Digi International, Inc. Securities Litigation
See, e.g., DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990); Weisburgh, 158 F.R.D. at 641 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Comercia Bank v. Suburban Trust and Savings Bank and Columbia National Bank of Chicago
When that court has not yet ruled on the issue at hand, however, a federal court must ascertain the state law from "all relevant data." Bailey v. V & O Press Co., 770 F.2d 601, 604 (6th Cir.1985); see also Mahne v. Ford Motor Co., 900 F.2d 83, 87 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 (1990) (to the extent the state supreme court has not yet addressed the present issue it is our duty to anticipate how that court would rule).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Discovery Zone Securities Litigation
See Sears v. Likens, 912 F.2d 889, 893 (7th Cir.1990); Reshal, 754 F.Supp. at 1230 ; see also DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Detrick v. Daniel F. Young, Inc.
See, e.g., Borow v. nVIEW Corp., 829 F.Supp. 828, 831 (E.D.Va.1993) (citing DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990)). 35 Nor did his precom-plaint inquiry yield anything beyond a suspicion or hunch that D.F.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fry v. UAL Corp.
See also Serabian v. Amoskeag Bank Shares, 24 F.3d 357 (1st Cir.1994) (noting that securities laws “ ‘do not guarantee sound business practices’” and that “plaintiffs must plead more than that defendants acted irresponsibly or unwisely”) (quoting DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990)); Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 948 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); Craftmatic Sec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tribune Co. v. Purcigliotti
Id. (citing Wilson v. Saintine Exploration and Drilling Corp., 872 F.2d 1124 (2d Cir.1989)); see also DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 629 (7th Cir.) (“[F]ees for two years’ audits could not approach the losses E & W would suffer from a perception that it would muffle a client’s fraud.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laker v. Freid
See also DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 629 (7th Cir.) (“Although Rule 9(b) does not require ‘particularity’ with respect to the defendants’ mental state, the complaint still must afford a basis for believing that plaintiffs could prove scienter.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pasternak v. Colonial Equities Corp.
IIT v. Cornfeld, 619 F.2d 909, 925 (2d Cir.1980) (accountant not liable as an aider and abettor for failure to disclose general “wrongs” not dependent on or tied to its role as an accountant); see also DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 625 (7th Cir.) (Easterbrook, J.) (“Although accountants must exercise care in giving opinions on the accuracy and adequacy of firms’ financial statements, they have no broader duty to search and sing.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Colonial Ltd. Partnership Litigation
IIT v. Cornfeld, 619 F.2d 909, 925 (2d Cir. 1980) (accountant not liable as an aider and abettor for failure to disclose general "wrongs" not dependent on or tied to its role as an accountant); see also DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 625 (7th Cir.) (Easterbrook, J.) ("Although accountants must exercise care in giving opinions on the accuracy and adequacy of firms' financial statements, they have no broader duty to search and sing."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.I. Credit Corp. v. Hartford Computer Group, Inc.
See also DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 626 (7th Cir.1990) (the Seventh Circuit held that plaintiffs must plead the circumstances constituting fraud in detail — the “who, what, when, where, and how ...”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990); Graue Mill Dev.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Douglas v. Tonigan
June 5, 1987); see also DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 627 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 941 , 111 S.Ct. 347 , 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990).
Khan
v.
Jenkins
v.
Jenkins
No. 90-414.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1990.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.