green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Jason Spence, Individually and as Heir and Representative of the Estate of David Spence, Joel Spence, Individually and as Heir and Representative of the Estate of David Spence, And Estate of Anthony Melendez v. State
See id. at 746 n.1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Franklin v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Spence v. State, 758 S.W.2d 597, 599-600 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 932 , 111 S.Ct. 1339 , 113 L.Ed.2d 271 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
William Van Poyck v. Florida Department of Corrections, Michael W. Moore, Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections
See Van Poyck v. State, 564 So.2d 1066 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, Van Poyck v. Florida, 499 U.S. 932 , 111 S.Ct. 1339 , 113 L.Ed.2d 270 (1991) (hereinafter "Van Poyck I").
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. State
See Spence v. State, 758 S.W.2d 597, 599-600 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 932 , 111 S.Ct. 1339 , 113 L.Ed.2d 271 (1991); Rivera v. State, 981 S.W.2d 336, 341 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prystash v. State
(2×)
See Spence v. State, 795 S.W.2d 743, 758-59 (Tex.Cr.App.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 932 , 111 S.Ct. 1339 , 113 L.Ed.2d 271 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kuchinskas v. Broward County
See Abshire v. County of Kern, 908 F.2d 483, 484 (9th Cir.1990) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1068 , 111 S.Ct. 785 , 112 L.Ed.2d 848 , rehearing denied, 499 U.S. 932 , 111 S.Ct. 1341 , 113 L.Ed.2d 272 (1991); Atlanta Professional Firefighters Union v. Atlanta, 920 F.2d 800 , 805 (11th Cir.1991) (“the ‘short test’ requires that an employee be paid on a ‘salary basis’ and have a ‘primary duty’ as an administrator”). 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinson
See, e.g., Spence v. State, 795 S.W.2d 743, 752 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 932 , 111 S.Ct. 1339 , 113 L.Ed.2d 271 (1991) (bite-mark evidence admitted); Reed v. State, 644 S.W.2d 479, 482 (Tex.Crim.App.1983) (amytol sodium test rejected); Crawford v. State, 617 S.W.2d 925, 930 (Tex.Crim.App.1980) (polygraph results rejected); Wilson v. State, 697 S.W.2d 83, 84 (Tex.App.— El Paso 1985, pet. ref'd) (enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique to detect controlled substance rejected); Sosa v. State, 841 S.W.2d 912, 916-17 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no pet.) (graphoanalys…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Parker
v.
Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Winchester v. County of San Diego County of Kern, California v. Abshire Stem v. Ahearn Truesdale v. South Carolina Payne v. Middleton Armstrong v. Frank, Postmaster General Sandlin v. Ellis Diaz v. Miles, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility Henthorn v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia Veale v. New Hampshire In re Mulville In re Mulville Sandlin v. Allen Abiff v. Georgia
v.
Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Winchester v. County of San Diego County of Kern, California v. Abshire Stem v. Ahearn Truesdale v. South Carolina Payne v. Middleton Armstrong v. Frank, Postmaster General Sandlin v. Ellis Diaz v. Miles, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility Henthorn v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia Veale v. New Hampshire In re Mulville In re Mulville Sandlin v. Allen Abiff v. Georgia
No. 89-5961.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1991.
499 U.S. 932
Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar