green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Torricellas v. Core
See Miller v. Vasquez, 868 F.2d 1116 , 1118–12 (9th 16 Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 963 (1991); Middleton v. Cupp, 768 F.2d 1083 , 1085 17 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1021 (1986); Sturm v. California Adult Authority, 18 395 F.2d 446 . 448 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 947 (1969); see also Wilson v. 19 Corcoran, 562 U.S. 1 . 5 (2010) (“[I]t is only noncompliance with federal law that renders 20 a State’s criminal judgment susceptible to collateral attack in the federal courts.”). 21 In accordance with these authorities, courts in this circuit have held that a…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Benson
(2×)
See U.S. v. Moore, 917 F.2d 215, 228-230 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 1590 , 113 L.Ed.2d 654 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Giampa
“The decision whether to grant a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial court____” United States v. Saldarriaga, 987 F.2d 1526, 1531 (11th Cir.1993); see United States v. Clair, 934 F.2d 943, 945 (8th Cir.1991); United States v. Rocha, 916 F.2d 219, 234 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 934 , 111 S.Ct. 2057 , 114 L.Ed.2d 462 (1991); United States v. Bertoli, 854 F.Supp. 975, 1047 (D.N.J.1994), aff'd in part, sentencing vacated, 40 F.3d 1384 (3d Cir.1994); United States v. Crosley, 634 F.Supp. 28, 32 (E.D.Pa.1985), aff 'd, 787 F.2d 584 (3d Cir.1986). “[T]he single most …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glenn E. Wortman
See United States v. Moore, 917 F.2d 215 (6th Cir. 1990) (holding if government violates Brady obligation and the defendant is seriously prejudiced, a mistrial must be granted), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 963 (1991). 12 Defendant further contends that he is entitled to a two-level reduction in sentence for acceptance of responsibility.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth A. Selby (93-1424), Thomas C. Dix (93-1451), Mark C. Shinaberry (93-1455)
See United States v. Moore, 917 F.2d 215, 222 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 963 (1991). 47 After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the records of the deposits into evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bertoli
“The decision whether to grant a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial court....” United States v. Saldarriaga, 987 F.2d 1526, 1531 (11th Cir.1993); see United States v. Clair, 934 F.2d 943, 945 (8th Cir.1991); United States v. Rocha, 916 F.2d 219, 234 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom., Hinojosa v. United States, 500 U.S. 934 , 111 S.Ct. 2057 , 114 L.Ed.2d 462 (1991); United States v. Crosley, 634 F.Supp. 28, 32 (E.D.Pa.1985), aff'd mem., 787 F.2d 584 (3d Cir.1986). “[T]he single most important factor in making [this] determination is the extent to which the defendant …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Evanoff
See United States v. Sahhar, 917 F.2d 1197, 1207 (9th Cir.1990) (remoteness of activity but one factor for court to consider in finding dangerousness under § 4246), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 1591 , 113 L.Ed.2d 655 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Michael Apelt
See State v. Hinchey, 165 Ariz. 432, 439-40 , 799 P.2d 352, 359-60 (1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 1589 , 113 L.Ed.2d 653 (1991); State v. Fierro, 166 Ariz. 539, 548 , 804 P.2d 72, 81 (1990) (absent a showing to the contrary, we presume the trial court considered only relevant information and disregarded anything irrelevant or inflammatory). 16.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bible
See State v. Hinchey, 165 Ariz. 432, 438 , 799 P.2d 352, 358 (1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 1589 , 113 L.Ed.2d 653 (1991); State v. Libberton, 141 Ariz. 132, 139 , 685 P.2d 1284, 1291 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jimmie Wayne Jeffers v. Samuel Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections Donald Wawrzaszek, Superintendent, Arizona State Prison
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Hinchey, 165 Ariz. 432, 440 , 799 P.2d 352, 360 (1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 1589 , 113 L.Ed.2d 653 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re the Detention of P.S.
See also United States v. Sahhar, 917 F.2d 1197, 1207 (9th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 963 (1991) (finding of substantial risk of bodily injury or serious property damage may be based on any activity that displays a genuine possibility of future harm to persons or property; whether that activity occurred recently is but one factor for the district court to consider in weighing the evidence).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hinchey
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
No. 90-5946.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1991.
499 U.S. 963
Published
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.