green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
“a utility has the burden to prove the prudence and reasonableness of its expenditures before a rate increase can be approved.”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Texas Industrial Energy Consumers, Cities Advocating Reasonable Deregulation, and Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and Southwestern Electric Power Company
a utility has the burden to prove the prudence and reasonableness of its expenditures before a rate increase can be approved.
cited
Cited "see"
in Re: Rigney Construction & Development, LLC
See, Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, 798 S.W.2d 560, 564 (Tex. 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1641 , 113 L.Ed.2d 736 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vincent Properties, Inc. v. Five Star Partners, L.P. (In Re Five Star Partners, L.P.)
Lincoln Savings Bank, FSB v. Suffolk Co. Treasurer (In re Parr *612 Meadows Racing Assoc., Inc.), 880 F.2d 1540, 1544-45 (2nd Cir.1989), cert. denied sub nom., Suffolk Co. Treasurer v. Barr, 493 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 869 , 107 L.Ed.2d 953 (1990); Accord, Makoroff v. City of Lockport, N.Y., 916 F.2d 890 , 895-96 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom., City of Lockport, N.Y. v. U.S., 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1640 , 113 L.Ed.2d 735 (1991) (city permitted to perfect tax lien post-petition only where it had performed all other acts necessary to attachment of lien before filing of petition).
cited
Cited "see"
Crossman v. Crosson
See Tolliver v. Xerox Corp., 918 F.2d 1052, 1057 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1641 , 113 L.Ed.2d 736 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryson v. Fluor Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Tolliver v. Xerox Corp., 918 F.2d 1052, 1058 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1641 , 113 L.Ed.2d 736 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Reuters America, Inc. v. Sharp
See Hearst v. Iowa Dep’t of Revenue & Fin., 461 N.W.2d 295, 303 (Iowa 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1639 , 113 L.Ed.2d 735 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Messino
See United States v. Hope, 906 F.2d 254, 258 (7th Cir.1990) (“The officer’s subjective reasons, or ‘motive’, for stopping the defendant are relevant, if at all, only in establishing what facts the officer actually had knowledge of at the time of the arrest.” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1640 , 113 L.Ed.2d 735 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Reuters America, Inc. v. John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, Martha Whitehead, Treasurer of the State of Texas, and Dan Morales, Attorney General of the State of Texas
See Hearst v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue & Fin. , 461 N.W.2d 295, 303 (Iowa 1990), cert. denied , 499 U.S. 983 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Qualitex Company v. Jacobson Products Company, Inc.
See NutraSweet Co. v. Stadt Corp., 917 F.2d 1024, 1027 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1640 , 113 L.Ed.2d 735 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Peltz v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
See, e.g., Makoroff v. City of Lockport, 916 F.2d 890 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1640 , 113 L.Ed.2d 735 (1991); Lincoln Sav.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
HJ Wilson Co. v. STATE TAX COM'N
See also Hearst Corp. v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue and Finance, 461 N.W.2d 295 (Iowa 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1639 , 113 L.Ed.2d 735 (1991) (holding that, while classification of the publication's writing as news was a consideration, its form and frequency of publication were the primary factors for determining its qualification for the tax exemption for newspapers).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
H. J. Wilson Company, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Commission
See also Hearst Corp. v. Iowa Dep 't of Revenue and Finance, 461 N.W. 2d 295 (Iowa 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 983 (1991) (holding that, while classification of the publication's writing as news was a consideration, its form and frequency of publication were the primary factors for determining its qualification for the tax exemption for newspapers).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Henry
See e.g., Makoroff v. City of Lockport, 916 F.2d 890 (3d Cir.1990), cert, denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1640 , 113 L.Ed.2d 735 (1991); Lincoln Savings Bank, FSB v. Suffolk County Treasurer (In re Parr Meadows Racing Assoc., Inc.), 880 F.2d 1540, 1547 (2nd Cir.1989), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 869 , 107 L.Ed.2d 953 (1990). 5 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Photaz Imports Ltd., Inc.
See, e.g., Nutrasweet Co. v. Stadt Corp., 917 F.2d 1024 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 1640 , 113 L.Ed.2d 735 (1991); Kodak v. Fotomat, 317 F.Supp. at 309 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commissioner of Revenue of Tennessee
v.
Newsweek, Inc. and Commissioner of Revenue of Tennessee v. Southern Living, Inc.
v.
Newsweek, Inc. and Commissioner of Revenue of Tennessee v. Southern Living, Inc.
No. 90-273.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1991.
Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.Reported below: 789 S. W. 2d 247 (first case) and 251 (second case).