green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1997 ·
…even assuming that right to petition was implicated, the pickering/connick balancing test is equally applicable in deciding whether the state's interest as an employer outweighs the irst mendment interest of the employee.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robin Joy Shahar v. Michael J. Bowers, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Georgia
even assuming that right to petition was implicated, the pickering/connick balancing test is equally applicable in deciding whether the state's interest as an employer outweighs the irst mendment interest of the employee.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Shahar v. Bowers
even assuming that right to petition was implicated, the pickering/connick balancing test is equally applicable in deciding whether the state's interest as an employer outweighs the irst mendment interest of the employee.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Classic Chemical and Supply Co.
See In re GLK, Inc., 921 F.2d 967 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1205 , 111 S.Ct. 2797 , 115 L.Ed.2d 971 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Chicago Club
See United States v. Columbus Country Club, 915 F.2d 877, 881-82 (3d Cir. 1990) (defendant has burden to show it is a private or religious club excepted from Title VIII fair housing laws), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1205 , 111 S.Ct. 2797 , 115 L.Ed.2d 971 (1991); United States v. Lansdowne Swim Club, 894 F.2d 83, 85 (3d Cir.1990) (defendant must prove it is a private club excepted from Title II); Singleton v. Gendason, 545 F.2d 1224, 1226 (9th Cir.1976) (defendant must demonstrate it is excepted from Title VIII as a single-family dwelling); Nesmith v. Young Men’s Christian Ass’n, 397 F.2d 96 ,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Woods v. Foster
See United States v. Columbus Country Club, 915 F.2d 877 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1205 , 111 S.Ct. 2797 , 115 L.Ed.2d 971 (1991); Baxter v. City of Belleville, 720 F.Supp. 720 (S.D.Ill.1989); Patel v. Holley House Motels, 483 F.Supp. 374 (S.D.Ala.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. City of Hayward, United States of America v. City of Hayward
“Exemptions from the Fair Housing Act are to be construed narrowly, in recognition of the important goal of preventing housing discrimination.” Massaro v. Mainlands Section 1 & 2 Civic Ass’n, 3 F.3d 1472, 1475 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 56 , 130 L.Ed.2d 15 (1994); accord United States v. Columbus Country Club, 915 F.2d 877, 882-83 (3d Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1205 , 111 S.Ct. 2797 , 115 L.Ed.2d 971 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez v. Ever Fresh Co.
See, e.g., United States v. Columbus Country Club, 915 F.2d 877 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1205 , 111 S.Ct. 2797 , 115 L.Ed.2d 971 (1991); Woods v. Foster, 884 F.Supp. 1169 (N.D.Ill.1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duyck
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 90-1526.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)
App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 9th and 10th Jud. Dists. Certiorari denied.