green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Young
(3×)
See id. at 983. ___ ___ In addition, when "a defendant has possession of the transcript and tape prior to trial and raises no pretrial objection, the district court is not obliged to interrupt the trial to screen the transcript for accuracy prior to its use by the jury." United States v. Font-Ramirez, 944 F.2d 42 , 48 _____________ ____________ (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 (1992). _____ ______ Instead, the district court may simply listen to the tape as it is played for the jury, follow the transcript, and rule on specific objections as they arise.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Salisbury
See United States v. Devine, 934 F.2d 1325, 1348 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mario Chalarca, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See United States v. Font-Ramirez, 944 F.2d 42, 48-49 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 , 112 S.Ct. 954 , 117 L.Ed.2d 122 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Broussard
See United States v. Devine, 934 F.2d 1325, 1345-46 (5th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 , 112 S.Ct. 954 , 117 L.Ed.2d 121 (1992) (determining that the defendant’s prior cocaine dealing was admissible in trial for conspiracy to manufacture and sell methamphetamine).
discussed
Cited "see"
Geralds v. State
An expert is permitted to express an opinion on matters in which the witness has expertise when the opinion is in response to facts disclosed to the expert at or before the trial. § 90.704, Fla.Stat. (1993); see Capehart v. State, 583 So.2d 1009 (Fla.1991) (holding chief medical examiner, who based her opinion on autopsy report, toxicology report, evidence receipts, photographs of body, and all other paperwork filed in case, could testify regarding cause of death and condition of victim's body, although she did not perform autopsy), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 , 112 S.Ct. 955 , 117 L.Ed.2d 12…
discussed
Cited "see"
McIntosh v. State
See Capehart v. State, 583 So.2d 1009 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 (1992); Delvalle v. State, 653 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), review denied, 662 So.2d 931 (Fla.1995); Wilcoxson v. State, 577 So.2d 1388 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United ___ ______ States v. Font-Ramirez, 944 F.2d 42, 46-47 (1st Cir. 1991), ______ ____________ cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. Font-Ramirez, 944 F.2d 42, 46-47 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Geraldo Rodriguez, A/K/A Jose Rodriguez
See United States v. Font-Ramirez, 944 F.2d 42, 46-47 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 , 112 S.Ct. 954 , 117 L.Ed.2d 122 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Walter Weaver
See United States v. Beltran-Felix, 934 F.2d 1075 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 (1992)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramiro Mesa-Farias
See United States v. Beltran-Felix, 934 F.2d 1075 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 , 112 S.Ct. 955 , 117 L.Ed.2d 123 (1992) (sentencing error harmless where defendant was subject to statutory minimum even without the error).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BEN EARSAL SALISBURY
See United States v. Devine, 934 F.2d 1325, 1348 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foley v. Commonwealth
Collins v. Commonwealth, Ky., 951 S.W.2d 569, 576 (1997); see also, Epperson v. Commonwealth, Ky., 809 S.W.2d 835, 841 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1065 , 112 S.Ct. 955 , 117 L.Ed.2d 122 (1992); Commonwealth v.. Littrell, Ky., 677 S.W.2d 881 (1984); Combs v. Commonwealth, Ky., 356 S.W.2d 761 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Ortega, Jesus Mancinas
See, e.g., United States v. Font-Ramirez, 944 F.2d 42, 49 (1st Cir.1991) (burden on government to prove sufficient facts for enhancements for, e.g., ... possession of firearms), cert. denied, [ 502 U.S. 1065 , 112 S.Ct. 954 , 117 L.Ed.2d 122 ] (1992).”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 480 , 121 L.Ed.2d 386 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector FUENTES-MONTIJO and Ruben Campoy-Silva Defendants-Appellants
Pena-Espinoza, 47 F.3d at 360 (no showing that transcripts were “substantially inaccurate”); United States v. Armijo, 5 F.3d 1229, 1234-35 (9th Cir.1993) (no showing at trial that translation was inaccurate); Taghipour, 964 F.2d at 910 (parties stipulated to accuracy; no showing of prejudice); see also United States v. Font-Ramirez, 944 F.2d 42, 48 (1st Cir.1991) (“Because [appellant] did not offer an alternative transcript and did not point out any specific inaccuracies in the government’s transcript, the district court was within its discretion in allowing its use.”), cert. denied,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hill
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 91-6529.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1992.
502 U.S. 1065
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.