green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“including” may be defined as “in addition to”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Perry
including" may be defined as "in addition to
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hedges
See State v. William, 248 Kan. 389, 407-08 , 807 P.2d 1291 , cert. denied 502 U.S. 837 (1991) (citing Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 , 93 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Baston
See State v. William, 248 Kan. 389, 411 , 807 P.2d 1292 , cert. denied 502 U.S. 837 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Sumter Tours, Inc. v. Babbitt
See Adams v. Dole, 927 F.2d 771, 774 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 837 , 112 S.Ct. 122 , 116 L.Ed.2d 90 (1991) (If the language of a statute is clear, a court must give effect to the intent of Congress as expressed in the statute; “[i]f the statute is ambiguous, however, the question then becomes one of whether the interpretation by the agency charged with its administration is a permissible one.” (citing Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-44 , 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781-82 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Sumter Tours, Inc. v. Babbitt
See Adams v. Dole, 927 F.2d 771, 774 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 837 , 112 S.Ct. 122 , 116 L.Ed.2d 90 (1991) (If the language of a statute is clear, a court must give effect to the intent of Congress as expressed in the statute; "[i]f the statute is ambiguous, however, the question then becomes one of whether the interpretation by the agency charged with its administration is a permissible one." (citing Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-44 , 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781-82 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984))). 25 H.R. 2091, the bill which ultimately became …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Holmes
See also State v. William, 248 Kan. 389, 410 , 807 P.2d 1292 , cert. denied 502 U.S. 837 (1991) (confession was voluntary where the defendant did not ask for sleep and the evidence did not indicate that the officers promised the defendant he could go to sleep as soon as he confessed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lane
See also State v. William, 248 Kan. 389 , Syl. ¶ 15, 807 P.2d 1292 (holding that when a defendant initiates contact with the police after an assertion of a Sixth Amendment right to counsel, defendant waives that right and his or her statements are admissible), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 837 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tuilaepa v. California
(2×)
See, e. g., People v. Kaurish, 52 Cal. 3d 648, 717 , 802 P. 2d 278, 316 (1990) (trial judge concluded that factor (h), dealing with a defendant's impaired capacity to appreciate the criminality of his actions, was an aggravating factor because defendant did not have diminished capacity or other impairment), cert. denied, 502 U. S. 837 (1991); People v. Hamilton, 48 Cal. 3d 1142, 1186 , 774 P. 2d 730, 757 (1989) (trial court concluded that 10 of 11 factors were aggravating, including factors (d)(h) and (j)), cert. denied, 494 U. S. 1039 (1990). [19] The factors that can serve only as mitigato…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-8192.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.