green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“legislators' immunity is absolute, and extends to injunctive as well as to damages suits.”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hall v. Louisiana
legislators' immunity is absolute, and extends to injunctive as well as to damages suits.
cited
Cited "see"
Opala v. Watt
See Risser v. Thompson, 930 F.2d 549, 551 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 860 , 112 S.Ct. 180 , 116 L.Ed.2d 142 (1991); Alia v. Michigan Supreme Court, 906 F.2d 1100, 1102 (6th Cir. 1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Cassel v. Kolb
See In re Atchison, 925 F.2d 209 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied sub nom, Jones v. Atchison, 502 U.S. 860 , 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas J. Maloney
(2×)
"This section of RICO is capable of providing for the linkage in one proceeding of a number of otherwise distinct crimes and/or conspiracies through the concept of enterprise conspiracy." United States v. Neapolitan, 791 F.2d 489, 501 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940 , 107 S.Ct. 422 , 93 L.Ed.2d 372 (1986); see United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1540 (11th Cir.) ("The notion of 'enterprise conspiracy' ... has made much of the old distinction between 'single conspiracy' and 'multiple conspiracy' irrelevant to RICO conspiracy charges."), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Walter Starrett, Timothy Kevin Duke, Michael Lee Cave, Donald Joe Sears, James Thomas Nolan, Frederick Joseph Hegney, United States of America v. Donald Joe Sears, James Thomas Nolan
Sec. 1962 (d), the government must prove that the defendants "objectively manifested, through words or actions, an agreement to participate in the conduct of the affairs of the enterprise through the commission of two or more predicate crimes." Russo, 796 F.2d at 1455 (citation and quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1540 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 860 , 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991); United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d 880, 902 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 349 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Starrett
The RICO Conspiracy Count To establish a RICO conspiracy violation under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d), the government must prove that the defendants “objectively manifested, through words or actions, an agreement to participate in the conduct of the affairs of the enterprise through the commission of two or more predicate crimes.” Russo, 796 F.2d at 1455 (citation and quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1540 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 860 , 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991); United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d 880, 902 (5th Cir.), cert. denied…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ryan
v.
Colorado
v.
Colorado
No. 91-77.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: M.D. Louisiana (1)
Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.