green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
14.6 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 2 distinct cases ·
"McKinney II"
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Frank R. Lapena v. Vernon Kissel, Correctional Officer Eldon K. McDaniel Warden Does I Through Xx
mckinney ii
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
(PS) Horn v. Experis US, Inc.
(ECF No. 34.) “Production of the transcript at government expense for an 19 appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial judge certifies 20 that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial question.” McKinney v. Anderson, 924 21 F.2d 1500 , 1511 (9th Cir.), overruled on other grounds by Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 22 (1991).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Singleton v. Kernan
See 28 U.S.C. § 753 (f); McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500 , 23 1511-12 (9th Cir.1991), overruled on other grounds by Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 24 (1991) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion and noting that “[p]roduction of the transcript 25 at government expense for an appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case is proper under 28 26 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a 27 1 Plaintiff was represented by counsel in his trial.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Freeman R. Davis v. Burvant, Md Shedier, Md Turella, Md Myers, Md Sheppard, Cmo, Textor Shedler, Mta Middleton Janzam Astorga Mundull, Md
Cf. McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1510-11 (9th Cir.), vacated on other grounds sub nom., Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903, 903 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harth v. Mississippi Department of Correction
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991); Webster v. Sowders, 846 F.2d 1032 , 1038–39 (6th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trueblood v. Cappola
See 22 McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 23 502 U.S. 903 (1991). 24 1 At this point in the proceedings, no dispositive motions have been filed, and the Court 2 has not yet had the opportunity to review the parties’ evidence and arguments in the context of a 3 summary judgment motion.
cited
Cited "see"
Arvie Carroll v. K. Dutra
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir.1991), overruled on other grounds by Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991) (standard of review).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tommy James Gillentine v. Correctional Medical Services
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir.) (concluding that Rule 706 permits a district court to apportion all of the cost to one side in an appropriate case), vacated on other grounds, Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991), judgment reinstated, McKinney v. Anderson, 959 F.2d 853 (9th Cir.1992); Webster v. Sowders, 846 F.2d 1032, 1038-39 (6th Cir.1988) (concluding that the district court "has authority to apportion costs under this rule, including excusing impecunious parties from their share"); U.S. Marshals Serv. v. Means, 741 F.2d 1053 , 10…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald Foster v. Sandra Cole
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511-12 (9th Cir.1991), overruled on other grounds by Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion and noting that “[production of the transcript at government expense for an appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial question”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis Gieck v. Romero
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511-12 (9th Cir.1991), overruled on other grounds by Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion and noting that “[production of the transcript at government expense for an appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial question”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Amando Sanders v. M. York
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds sub.nom., Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991); see also Gupta v. Terhune, 262 Fed.Appx. 772, 773 (9th Cir.2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. Crawford
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir. 1991), vacated on other grounds sub. nom., Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Sosa
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds sub. nom., Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Gupta v. Terhune
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir. 1991), vacated on other grounds sub. nom., Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Los Angeles Police Department
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds sub. nom., Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Santos v. Gates
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511-12 (9th Cir.1991), overruled on other grounds by Hell ing v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pedraza v. Jones
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991); Webster v. Sowders, 846 F.2d 1032, 1038-39 (6th Cir.1988).
examined
Cited "see"
Joseph Serfecz and First Chicago Trust v. Jewel Food Stores
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Nelson v. Monroe Regional Medical Ctr., 925 F.2d 1555, 1563-65 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 285 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991) (holding that patients who were denied medical treatment on non-emergency basis had standing to bring antitrust action against medical center); Ball Memorial Hosp., Inc. v. Mutual Hosp., Inc., 784 F.2d 1325 , 1334 (7th Cir.1986) (“When the plaintiff is a poor champion of consumers, a court must be especially careful not to grant relief that may undercut the proper functions of antitrust.”); see also II Phillip E.
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Unified School District No. 501
See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1510-11 (9th Cir.) vacated on other grds, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 291 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Baxter v. Vigo County School Corporation
See Nelson v. Monroe Medical Ctr., 925 F.2d 1555, 1559 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 285 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991); 5A Charles A. Wright & Arthur R.
cited
Cited "see"
Baxter ex rel. Baxter v. Vigo County School Corp.
See Nelson v. Monroe Medical Ctr., 925 F.2d 1555, 1559 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 285 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991); 5A Charles A. Wright & Arthur R.
cited
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. Children's Service Society
See Nelson v. Monroe Regional Medical Ctr., 925 F.2d 1555, 1559 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 285 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Michelle Kennedy v. Children's Service Society Of Wisconsin
See Nelson v. Monroe Regional Medical Ctr., 925 F.2d 1555, 1559 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 285 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
(HC) (DP) Espinoza v. Ornoski
See, e.g., 18 McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511 (9th Cir.), judgment vacated on other grounds, 19 502 U.S. 903 (1991), reinstated, 959 F.2d 853 (9th Cir. 1992), and aff’d, 509 U.S. 25 (1993). 20 The Ninth Circuit and other federal courts have held, however, that Rule 706 is not so inflexible. 21 District courts have ample tools at their disposal if an independent expert’s opinion is necessary 22 but one party is indigent.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connell v. East River Savings Bank
(2×)
Causation is “a necessary element of any claim for relief under ... the Clayton Act.” Argus, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 801 F.2d at 41 . “[L]ack of causation in fact is fatal to the merits of any antitrust claim.” Ibid.; see also Nelson v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, 925 F.2d 1555, 1562-63 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 285 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvey J. Sanner, Warren D. Jones, Also Known as Corky, H. Dean Adkins v. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Patrick H. Arbor, Donald G. Andrew
(2×)
See also Nelson v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, 925 F.2d 1555, 1562 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 903 , 112 S.Ct. 285 , 116 L.Ed.2d 236 (1991); Southwest Suburban Board of Realtors, 830 F.2d at 1377 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Monroe Clinic
v.
Nelson
v.
Nelson
No. 91-61.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1991.
Cited by 29 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.