green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…as used in , a 'procedural' defect is any defect that does not go to the question of whether the case originally could have been brought in federal district court ...
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Cross v. Bell Helmets, USA
But see Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, 932 F.2d 1540 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 430 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991) (stating that a procedural defect within the meaning of section 1447(c) is "any defect that does not go to the question whether the case originally could have been brought in federal district court”); Williams v. AC Spark Plugs, 985 F.2d 783 (finding that wrongful removal under § 1445(c) in the Fifth Circuit just as wrongful removals under §§ 1445(a) and 1441(b) are procedural defects that can be waived); Pavone v. Mississippi Riverboat Amusement Corp., 52 F.3d 56…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward Trucking Corp.
as used in , a 'procedural' defect is any defect that does not go to the question of whether the case originally could have been brought in federal district court ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Ward Trucking Corp.
as used in , a 'procedural' defect is any defect that does not go to the question of whether the case originally could have been brought in federal district court ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Chestnut-Adams Ltd. Partnership v. Bricklayers & Masons Trust Funds
erisa preempts new state-law causes of action for the collection of contributions because . . . erisa itself provides the remedies
discussed
Cited "see"
Allgaier v. Microbiologics, Inc.
See Duke v. Uniroyal, Inc., 928 F.2d 1413, 1418 (4th Cir.) (explaining that in reduction-in-force suits determining the employee that replaced the plaintiff may prove difficult, often because jobs have been eliminated or combined), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawrence J. Mathieu v. Gopher News Company
See Newhouse, 110 F.3d at 641-42 (“If a plaintiff is close to retirement, front pay may be the only practical approach.") (citing Duke v. Uniroyal, Inc., 928 F.2d 1413, 1424 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 429 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Superior-FCR Landfill, Inc. v. County of Wright
See Paragould Cablevision v. City of Paragould, 930 F.2d 1310 , 1313 (8th Cir.1991) (stating that local governments can "defeat antitrust challenges only if the anticompetitive consequence necessarily and reasonably results from engaging in the authorized activity”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 430 , 116 L.Ed.2d 450 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leary v. Hobet Mining, Inc.
See Duke v. Uniroyal, Inc., 928 F.2d 1413, 1418-19 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 429 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991)(acknowledging the legitimacy of discharging plaintiffs because “they were the least qualified for the existing and future needs of Uniroyal”); Page v. Bolger, 645 F.2d 227, 230 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 892 , 102 S.Ct. 388 , 70 L.Ed.2d 206 (1981)(accepting as legitimate a business’s weighing its future needs and the relative qualifications of each employee, even though such weighing necessarily involved some subjective factors).
discussed
Cited "see"
73 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1496, 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,644 Richard Newhouse, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. McCormick & Co., Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee
See Duke v. Uniroyal, Inc., 928 F.2d 1413, 1424 (4th Cir.) ("If a plaintiff is close to retirement, front pay may be the only practical approach."), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 429 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Newhouse v. McCormick & Co.
See Duke v. Uniroyal, Inc., 928 F.2d 1413, 1424 (4th Cir.) (“If a plaintiff is close to retirement, front pay may be the only practical approach.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 429 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc.
(2×)
See Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., 932 F.2d 1540 , 1543 & n. 3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 430 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991) (“Baris I").
cited
Cited "see"
Hilliard v. Manitowoc Co.
See Duke v. Uniroyal, Inc., 928 F.2d 1413, 1417 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
James O'COnnOr v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corporation, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae
(2×)
See Duke v. Uniroyal, Inc., 928 F.2d 1413, 1418 (4th Cir.) (explaining that in reduction-in-force suits determining the employee that replaced the plaintiff may prove difficult, often because jobs have been eliminated or combined), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 429 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Dynegy, Inc.
See, e.g., Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., 932 F.2d 1540, 1551 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 430 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Dynegy, Inc. Securities Litigation
See, e.g., Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., 932 F.2d 1540, 1551 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 430 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dao v. Knightsbridge International Reinsurance Corp.
See, e.g., Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., 932 F.2d 1540, 1543 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 430 , 116 L.Ed.2d 449 (1991); Nielsen v. Weeks Marine Inc., 910 F.Supp. 84, 86 (E.D.N.Y.1995) (holding that improper removal of Jones Act case did not strip district court of subject matter jurisdiction); Benjamin v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Am., 793 F.Supp. 729, 732-33 (S.D.Tex.1992); see generally 1 Benedict on Admiralty § 132 at 8-83 to 8-64 & n. 11; 1 Thomas J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Four T's Inc. v. Little Rock
See also Paragould Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Paragould, Ark., 930 F.2d 1310, 1312 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Four T's, Inc., Doing Business as Dollar Rent a Car of Little Rock v. Little Rock Municipal Airport Commission
See also Paragould Cablevision, Inc. v. City of *914 Paragould, Ark., 930 F.2d 1310, 1312 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 430 , 116 L.Ed.2d 450 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forest Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Mercy Ambulance of Richmond, Inc.
See, e.g., Paragould Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Paragould, Ark., 930 F.2d 1310, 1313 (8th Cir.1991) (holding that the exception is not a rule of law), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 430 , 116 L.Ed.2d 450 (1991); Allright Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 937 F.2d 1502, 1510 (10th Cir.1991) (same), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 983 , 112 S.Ct. 587 , 116 L.Ed.2d 612 (1993); Limeco, Inc. v. Div. Of Lime of Mississippi Dept. of Agric. and Commerce, 778 F.2d 1086, 1087 (5th Cir.1985) (no commercial exception to Parker doctrine).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of College Station, Tx v. City of Bryan, Tx
In order to obtain this exemption from the antitrust laws, a municipality must establish that it acts pursuant to a “clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed” state policy to displace competition with regulation. 8 Town of Hallie, 471 U.S. at 39 , 105 S.Ct. at 1716 ; see also Paragould Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Paragould, Arkansas, 930 F.2d 1310, 1312 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 963 , 112 S.Ct. 430 , 116 L.Ed.2d 450 (1991) (finding state action immunity as to a city’s statutorily authorized entry into the cable televisions business).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Siben
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 91-312.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 1991.
502 U.S. 963
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.