discussed Cited "see" James E. Rhodenizer v. United States See Schlup v. Armontrout, 941 F.2d 631, 639 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 909 (1992); Cox v. Wyrick, 642 F.2d 222, 226 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1021 (1981). -2- Assuming arguendo that Rhodenizer’s counsel misrepresented that the gun charges had been dismissed, we agree with the District Court that Rhodenizer was not thereby prejudiced, because he must have known that the representation was not accurate.