green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 7×
10.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1998 ·
…the fact that an international transaction may be subject to laws and remedies different and less favorable than those of the united states is not a valid basis to deny enforcement, provided that the law of the chosen forum is not inherently unfair.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
R.A. Argueta, Husband Mary Argueta, Wife Grupo Sal Corporation v. Banco Mexicano, S.A. Francisco Suarez Davila Alonso Cuevas Del Villar
But cf. Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., 969 F.2d 953, 956 (10th Cir.) (“A motion to dismiss based on a forum selection clause frequently is analyzed as a motion to dismiss for improper venue under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3).”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 658 , 121 L.Ed.2d 584 (1992).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cambridge Biotech Corp. v. Pasteur Sanofi Diagnostics
the fact that an international transaction may be subject to laws and remedies different or less favorable than those of the united states is not a valid basis to deny enforcement , provided that the law of the chosen forum is not inherently unfair
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Amundson & Associates Art Studio, Ltd. v. National Council on Compensation Insurance
this principle, which is central to the filed rate doctrine . . . , applies with equal force to preclude recovery under rico whether the rate at issue has been set by a state rate-making authority or a federal one
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,257, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1670 Irmgard Lipcon Mitchell Lipcon Charles R. Lipcon Barbara Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, A.K.A. Corporation of Lloyd's, A.K.A. Society of Lloyd's, A.K.A. Lloyd's of London
the fact that an international transaction may be subject to laws and remedies different and less favorable than those of the united states is not a valid basis to deny enforcement, provided that the law of the chosen forum is not inherently unfair.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the fact that an international transaction may be subject to laws and remedies different and less favorable than those of the united states is not a valid basis to deny enforcement, provided that the law of the chosen forum is not inherently unfair.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Destec Energy, Inc. v. Southern California Gas Co.
this principle, ..., applies with equal force to preclude recovery under rico whether the rate at issue has been set by a state rate-making authority or a federal one
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McCall v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
where such party shows the kind of conflict of interest that could realistically be expected to bias the decision makers, counsels in favor of withholding deference
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rizzo v. Paul Revere Insurance Group
anyone urging that a court disregard has the burden of showing some reason to believe the exercise of discretion has been tainted
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hubbard v. United States
(2×)
Cf. Rowland, 506 U. S., at 199 (construing 1 U. S. C. § 1 , which is generally applicable to any Act of Congress). [5] In addition, itis debatable at best whether the Court was correct in asserting that, but for its expansive interpretation of § 1001, Bramblett's fraud would necessarily have gone unpunished.
cited
Cited "see"
Boaz Rafaeli v. State of MO
See Rayes v. Johnson, 969 F.2d 700, 703 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 658 , 121 L.Ed.2d 584 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Jack Babcock v. Carl White
See Rayes v. Johnson, 969 F.2d 700, 702-03 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 658 , 121 L.Ed.2d 584 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Parton Donald Yates Terry Walls William Leonard James Bridgewater Robert Smith Ronald L. Boyer James King, Jack Babcock William Cooper Larry Schaal Gerald Bereuter v. Carl White, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent and Chief Administrative Officer at Missouri Training Center for Men at Moberly, Missouri Clarence D. Smith, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Division of Adult Institutions, Missouri Department of Corrections W. David Blackwell, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Division of Adult Institutions, Missouri Department of Corrections Lee Roy Black, in His Official Capacity as the Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections and Human Resources
See Rayes v. Johnson, 969 F.2d 700, 702-03 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Women's Medical Center of NW Houston v. Archer
See Barnes v. Moore, 970 F.2d 12, 14 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 656 , 121 L.Ed.2d 582 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Holland
Id. at 863; accord United States v. Poindexter, 951 F.2d 369, 373 (D.C.Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 656 , 121 L.Ed.2d 583 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Pedini v. Bowles
See Zal v. Steppe, 968 F.2d 924, 927 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 656 , 121 L.Ed.2d 582 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tufts v. Corporation of Lloyd's
See Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., 969 F.2d 953, 960 (10th Cir.) (involving claim against Lloyd’s by Name alleging fraud with respect to choice clauses), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 *813 S.Ct. 658, 121 L.Ed.2d 584 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Fund v. Arthur Straus Dawna Straus
See Zal v. Steppe, 968 F.2d 924, 932 (9th Cir.) (Trott, J., concurring) (First Amendment rights in the courtroom do not exceed the speaker's trial rights), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Purdham v. Fairfax County Public Schools
The Supreme Court has held that, in order to expedite the manner in which collective actions under the FLSA are assembled, “district courts have discretion in appropriate cases to implement ... § 216(b) ... by facilitating notice to potential plaintiffs.” Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Sperling, 493 U.S. 165, 169 , 110 S.Ct. 482 , 107 L.Ed.2d 480 (1989); see also Shaffer v. Farm Fresh, Inc., 966 F.2d 142, 147 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 657 , 121 L.Ed.2d 583 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Modanlo v. Ahan (In Re Modanlo)
See also Shaffer v. Farm Fresh, Inc., 966 F.2d 142 , 145 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, *238 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 657 , 121 L.Ed.2d 583 (1992); Aetna Cas. & Sur.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mezibov v. Allen
See, e.g., Zal, 968 F.2d 924 (upholding against First Amendment challenge attorney’s contempt citations for attempting to present excluded defenses to the jury and for using words forbidden by the judge, such as “abortion,” “fetus,” and “rights of the unborn”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 (1992); FED.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marc D. Mezibov v. Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Ohio
(2×)
See, e.g., Zal, 968 F.2d 924 (upholding against First Amendment challenge attorney’s contempt citations for attempting to present excluded defenses to the jury and for using words forbidden by the judge, such as “abortion,” “fetus,” and “rights of the unborn”), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 656 , 121 L.Ed.2d 582 (1992); fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edwards v. Akzo Nobel, Inc.
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 952 F.Supp. 162, 164-65 (W.D.N.Y.1997) (citing Pagan v. NYNEX Pension Plan, 52 F.3d 438, 442 (2d Cir.1995)); see also Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried Employees, 970 F.2d 1165, 1173 (3d Cir.) (degree of deference afforded to plan administrators would properly be reduced in cases involving “unfunded plans where benefits come directly from the sponsor’s assets and funded plans where the sponsor’s contributions each year are determined by the cost of satisfying plan liabilities in the immediately preceding year”), cert. denied, 50…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chloe Z Fishing Co. v. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd.
II § 3 (“The court of a Contracting State ... shall ... refer the parties to arbitration, unless it finds that the [ ] agreement in null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed.”); Oriental Commercial and Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Rosseel, N.V., 609 F.Supp. 75 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (holding that Under Article II, § 3, an agreement to arbitrate is “null and void” only when it is subject to internationally recognized defenses such as duress, mistake, fraud, or waiver, or when it contravenes fundamental policies of the forum nation); see also Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
QCC, INC. v. Hall
See, also, Taffet v. Southern Co. , 967 F.2d 1483 (11th Cir.) ( en banc ), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 1021 (1992) (exclusive jurisdiction of APSC required dismissal of fraud claims arising from allegations of fraudulent accounting of spare parts in inventory that improperly affected charges to subscribers).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DFW Vending, Inc. v. Jefferson County, Tex.
Facial challenges are the “most difficult challenges to mount successfully since the challenger must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid.” United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 , 107 S.Ct. 2095, 2100 , 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987); see also, Barnes v. Moore, 970 F.2d 12, 14 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 656 , 121 L.Ed.2d 582 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Planned Parenthood Of The Blue Ridge v. Camblos
Compare Casey v. Planned Parenthood, 14 F.3d 848 , 863 n. 21 (3d Cir.1994) with Barnes v. Moore, 970 F.2d 12 , 14 & n. 2 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 656 , 121 L.Ed.2d 582 (1992). 31 The district court erred, however, in reasoning from its conclusion that the Eighth Circuit was correct in Miller that Casey overruled Salerno, that Bellotti II perforce establishes the proper standard of review for facial challenges to abortion regulation statutes and directly controls the inquiry as to the constitutionality of judicial bypass procedures within parental notification (and no…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Planned Parenthood of Blue Ridge v. Camblos
Compare Casey v. Planned Parenthood, 14 F.3d 848 , 863 n. 21 (3d Cir.1994) with Barnes v. Moore, 970 F.2d 12 , 14 & n. 2 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 656 , 121 L.Ed.2d 582 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Voicelink Data Services, Inc. v. Datapulse, Inc.
See also Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., 969 F.2d 953 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 (1992); Commerce Consultants Int'l v. Vetrerie Riunite, S.P.A., 867 F.2d 697 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York
See, e.g., Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., 969 F.2d 953, 960 (10th Cir.) (involving claim against Lloyd’s by Name alleging fraud with respect to COL clause), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 658 , 121 L.Ed.2d 584 (1992); Tufts, 1996 WL 533639 , at *5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marcus v. AT & T CORP.
Id. at 22; see also Taffet v. Southern Co., 967 F.2d 1483, 1488-90 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (filed rate barred RICO action because customers had suffered no legally cognizable injury), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 657 , 121 L.Ed.2d 583 (1992); H.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fawn Mining Corporation v. Marty D. Hudson
(2×)
“Receiving,” especially when used with some item as its direct object, means “tak[ing] possession,” “knowingly accepting],” or “tak[ing] in;” it does not mean “applying for.” See, e.g., Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 1894 (1961); see also United States v. Poindexter, 951 F.2d 369, 379 (D.C.Cir.) (suggesting the importance of considering the objects of a verb as an aid to interpretation), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 656 , 121 L.Ed.2d 583 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Thorpe
See, e.g., Taffet v. Southern Co., 967 F.2d 1483, 1485 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 657 , 121 L.Ed.2d 583 (1992) (stating that cases raised question whether a private suit under RICO may be brought against a utility to recover for excessive charges for electrical power).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carl Thomas Swope v. Dr. John K. Cameron, ph.d. Michele Flowers, Psychologist
See, e.g., Rayes v. Johnson, 969 F.2d 700 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1021 , 113 S.Ct. 658 , 121 L.Ed.2d 584 (1992); Johnson v. Williams, 788 F.2d 1319 (8th Cir.1986); and Nelson v. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F.2d 1003 (8th Cir.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zal
v.
Steppe, Warden
v.
Steppe, Warden
No. 92-578.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1992.
506 U.S. 1021
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.