green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Sital v. Burgio
See Mendoza v. Blodgett, 960 F.2d 1425 , 1430 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1063 , 113 S.Ct. 1005 , 122 L.Ed.2d 154 (1993); Cann v. Hayman, No. 07-2416, 2008 WL 2276006 , at *7 (D.N.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Staula
See United States v. Ortiz, 966 F.2d 707 , 711 ___ _____________ _____ (1st Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1063 (1993). _____ ______ During the early evening of September 13, 1993, officer David Tyrie of the Hanover police department stopped a pickup truck for patent violations of the state motor vehicle code.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Staula
See United States v. Ortiz, 966 F.2d 707, 711 (1st Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 1063 , 113 S.Ct. 1005 , 122 L.Ed.2d 154 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonilla v. Volvo Car Corp.
However, the inference in London was permissible only because “evidence of mutual interest” was coupled with “know[ledge] that the property involved ... represented] the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity.” Id. at 1242 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1)(A)(i)); see also United States v. Ortiz,. 966 F.2d 707, 713-14 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1063 , 113 S.Ct. 1005 , 122 L.Ed.2d 154 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Houlihan
See, e.g., United States v. Ortiz, 966 F.2d 707 , ___ ____ _____________ _____ 711 (1st Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1063 (1993). _____ ______ For nearly four years Michael Fitzgerald and John Houlihan ran a ruthlessly efficient drug ring from an unlikely 4 command post: Kerrigan's Flower Shop, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Houlihan
See, e.g., United States v. Ortiz, 966 F.2d 707, 711 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1063 , 113 S.Ct. 1005 , 122 L.Ed.2d 154 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. Doe
Nonpunitive placement in IMU requires only an “informal nonadversary review of the information supporting [plaintiffs IMU placement], including whatever statement [plaintiff] wished to submit, within a reasonable time after confining him to [IMU].” Hewitt, 459 U.S. at 472 , 103 S.Ct. at 871-72 ; see also Mendoza v. Blodgett, 960 F.2d 1425, 1431 (9th Cir.1992) (to comport with due process, placement in dry-cell watch required notice and opportunity to respond in writing within a reasonable time), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1063 , 113 S.Ct. 1005 , 122 L.Ed.2d 154 (1993); Toussaint v. McCarthy, 8…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chaney
v.
Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 92-6543.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1993.
506 U.S. 1063
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.