green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Portalatin v. Cavalie
See Stewart v. Parish of Jefferson, 951 F.2d 681, 684 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Sutton v. Fitch
See Stewart v. Parish of Jefferson, 951 F.2d 681, 684 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Sutton v. Fitch
See Stewart v. Parish of Jefferson, 951 F.2d 681, 684 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Z. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Prong One: Whether the state-law causes of action address an area of ex- clusive federal concern Under the first prong of the conflict preemption test, a cause of action implicates an area of exclusive federal concern when the very essence of the cause of action is premised on the ex- istence of an employee benefit plan: See Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corp., 950 F.2d 1209, 1220 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Humana, Inc. v. Shrader & Assocs., LLP
See Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corp. , 950 F.2d 1209 , 1220 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S. Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992) (recognizing that *686 a claim "relates to a plan" when the very essence of the claim is premised on the existence of an employee benefit plan); Franks v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc. , 164 F.Supp.2d 865 , 874 (W.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wechsler v. Hunt Health Systems, Ltd.
See Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. v. National Mediation Board, 956 F.2d 1245, 1254 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 67 , 121 L.Ed.2d 34 (1992) (affirming Rule 11 sanctions even though district court erred in denying original motion to dismiss, because district court did not impose sanctions for substance of defendant’s motion, but rather because making the subsequent motion at that juncture, given Local Rule 3(j) and the law of the case doctrine, was not justified by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law). *358 The…
discussed
Cited "see"
Franks v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.
In this Circuit, a claim “relates to a plan” when the very essence of the claim is premised on the existence of an employee benefit plan: See Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corp., 950 F.2d 1209, 1220 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sam & Ali, Inc. Aleb, Inc. Mallough, Inc. And Murib, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Liquor Control and William A. Vasil
(2×)
See Brookpark Entertainment, Inc. v. Taft, 951 F.2d 710, 714 (6th Cir.1991) (mandating that no real issues of material fact are presented for resolution upon a facial challenge to a statute or ordinance), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Teresa Marie Pantani and Edmund L. Pantani v. Shirley D. Peterson, Commissioner of Irs and United States of America
See Virginia Atlantic Airways v. National Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245 , 1254 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 (1992) (applying abuse of discretion standard to appellate review of Rule 11 sanctions) (citing Cooter & Gell v. Harmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384 (1990)).
cited
Cited "see"
International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen v. Gallante
See Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. v. National Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245 , 1255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 67 , 121 L.Ed.2d 34 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. EI duPONT De NEMOURS & CO.
See Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corp., 950 F.2d 1209, 1215 (5th Cir.) (equitable tolling and equitable estoppel provide for tolling of the limitations period "when a plaintiff's unawareness of his ability to bring a claim either unawareness of the facts necessary to support a discrimination charge or unawareness of his legal rights is due to defendant's misconduct"), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992); Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools Div., 927 F.2d 876, 879 (5th Cir.) (because of company's statements, plaintiff was without sufficient facts to be aware of possibl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
See Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corp., 950 F.2d 1209, 1215 (5th Cir.) (equitable tolling and equitable estoppel provide for tolling of the limitations period “when a plaintiffs unawareness of his ability to bring a claim— either unawareness of the facts necessary to support a discrimination charge or unawareness of his legal rights — is due to defendant’s misconduct”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992); Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools Div., 927 F.2d 876, 879 (5th Cir.) (because of company’s statements, plaintiff was without sufficient facts to be aware of…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Palm Beach Cruises, S.A.
See Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. v. National Mediation Board, 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 67 , 121 L.Ed.2d 34 (1992); Z.K.
cited
Cited "see"
Aronoff v. Dwyer
See Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. v. National Mediation Board, 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 67 , 121 L.Ed.2d 34 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Davon, Inc. v. Shalala
See Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. Madigan, 956 F.2d 670, 673 (7th Cir.1992), certiorari denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 34 .
cited
Cited "see"
Davon, Inc. v. Shalala
See Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. Madigan, 956 F.2d 670, 673 (7th Cir.1992), certiorari denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 34 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quintana v. Lightner
Under ERISA’s conflict preemption provi sion, § 514(a), “any and all State laws [are displaced or superseded] insofar as they ... relate to any employee benefit plan.” 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a); see also Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 950 F.2d 1209 , 1217 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McSperitt v. Hartford Life Insurance
Under ERISA’s conflict preemption provision, § 514(a), “any and all State laws [are displaced or superceded] insofar as they ... relate to any employee benefit plan.” 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a); see also Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 950 F.2d 1209 , 1217 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baylor University Medical Center v. Epoch Group, L.C.
Under ERISA’s conflict preemption provision, § 514(a), “any and all State laws [are displaced or superceded] insofar as they ... relate to any employee benefit plan”. 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a); see also Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 950 F.2d 1209 , 1217 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Erlandson v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of Boston
Under ERISA’s conflict preemption provision, § 514(a), “any and all State laws [are displaced or superceded] insofar as they ... relate to any employee benefit plan.” 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a); see also Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 950 F.2d 1209 , 1217 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baylor University Medical Center v. Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield
Under ERISA’s conflict preemption provision, § 514(a), “any and all State laws [are displaced or superceded] insofar as they ... relate to any employee benefit plan”. 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a); see also Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 950 F.2d 1209 , 1217 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Union Corp.
Id. (citing United States v. Pollution Abatement Services of Oswego, Inc., 763 F.2d 133, 134 (2d Cir.1985) (corporate officers and shareholders individually liable for company discharging refuse into creek in violation of Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act of 1899); Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d at 664-66 (employees criminally liable for RCRA violations)); see also United States v. Production Plated Plastics, Inc., 742 F.Supp. 956 (W.D.Mich.1990), adopted 955 F.2d 45 , cert. denied 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 67 , 121 L.Ed.2d 34 (1990) (majority stockholder of corporation which owned hazard…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation
See also Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. Madigan, 956 F.2d 670, 673-74 (7th Cir.) (reversing grant of injunctive relief against enforcement of federal regulation because of availability of just compensation under Tucker Act (citing Monsanto and Preseault)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 34 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington Leg Fdn v. Texas Equal Access, e
See also Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. Madigan, 956 F.2d 670, 673-74 (7th Cir.) (reversing grant of injunctive relief against enforcement of federal regulation because of availability of just compensation under Tucker Act (citing Monsanto and Presault)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 (1992). 48 Other circuits have held otherwise.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Constantine v. American Airlines Pension Benefit Plan
See, e.g., Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corp., 950 F.2d 1209 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 68 , 121 L.Ed.2d 35 (1992) (holding ERISA preempts any state law cause of action which relates to an employee benefit claim); Lee v. E.I.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Goode
See, e.g., Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. v. Nat’l Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245 , 1254-55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 820 , 113 S.Ct. 67 , 121 L.Ed.2d 34 (1992) (upholding the imposition of sanctions on a defendant who resubmitted a motion that had been previously denied); Green v. Kadilac Mortgage Bankers, Ltd., 936 F.Supp. 108, 118 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (imposing sanctions on plaintiffs who “are intent on litigating the same issues over and over again” when they were previously decided); Siderpali S.P.A. v. Judal Indus., Inc., 833 F.Supp. 1023, 1029 (S.D.N.Y.1993) (imposing sanctions whe…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bridges
v.
Secretary of the Air Force
v.
Secretary of the Air Force
No. 91-1868.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
506 U.S. 820
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.