green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1996 ·
…new york courts have consistently looked to federal case law in expounding the human rights law
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Garcia v. Henry Street Settlement
the defendant's task is merely to articulate (not prove), via admissible evidence, a legitimate reason for the employment decision.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Joann S. Reed, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. A.W. Lawrence & Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
(2×)
new york courts have consistently looked to federal case law in expounding the human rights law
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Andrew Bartlik v. United States Department of Labor and Tennessee Valley Authority
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
he various circuits have as many definitions of 'direct evidence' as they do employment discrimination cases.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bartolotta v. Human Resources Agency of New Britain, Inc.
A plaintiff’s initial burden under the mixed-motive model is not an insignificant one. ‘‘[T]he plaintiff’s initial burden in a [mixed-motive] case is heavier than the de minimis showing required to establish a prima facie [case under the McDonnell Douglas-Burdine pretext model] . . . .’’ Raskin v. Wyatt Co., 125 F.3d 55, 60 (2d Cir. 1997); accord Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1181 (2d Cir.) (‘‘[i]n . . . a ‘mixed-motives’ case, the plaintiff must initially show more than the ‘not onerous’ McDonnell Douglas-Burdine factors’’), cert. denied, 506 U.S. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Lara v. Delta International Machinery Corp.
Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 146 , 118 S.Ct. 512 , 139 L.Ed.2d 508 (1997); see Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 959 F.2d 1349, 1360 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992); Peretz, 2009 WL 3124760 , at *1; Sorto-Romero, 2007 WL 2816191 , at *5.
discussed
Cited "see"
DeKenipp v. State
Gross also eliminated the mixed-motive approach in ADEA cases (Gross v FBL Financial Services, Inc., 557 US at 173-179 ; see Tyler v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F2d 1176, 1181 [2d Cir 1992], cert denied 506 US 826 [1992]; 2 NY PJI 9:1 Introductory Statement at 1518 [2011]).
discussed
Cited "see"
DeKenipp v. State
Gross also eliminated the mixed-motive approach in ADEA cases (Gross v FBL Financial Services, Inc., 557 US at 173-179 ; see Tyler v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F2d 1176, 1181 [2d Cir 1992], cert denied 506 US 826 [1992]; 2 NY PJI 9:1 Introductory Statement at 1518 [2011]).
cited
Cited "see"
Yolanda Peart v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
See Prud-homme v. Tenneco Oil Co., 955 F.2d 390, 392-96 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 48 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Xerox Corp. Securities Litigation
See Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1188 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Vanderwerf Ex Rel. Vanderwerf v. SmithKlineBeecham Corp.
See Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 959 F.2d 1349 , 1353 n. 1 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Christian v. Gray
See Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 959 F.2d 1349, 1360 (C.A.6), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Soldo v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.
See Daubert, 509 U.S. at 596 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 (“in the event the trial court concludes that the scintilla of evidence presented supporting a position is insufficient to allow a reasonable juror to conclude that the position more likely than not is true, the court remains free to ... grant summary judgment”) (citing Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 959 F.2d 1349 (6th Cir.) (holding that scientific evidence that provided foundation for expert testimony, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, was not sufficient to allow a jury to find it more probable than not that defendant cau…
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. Domus Development Corp.
In a “mixed-motives” case, unlike a “pretext” case, “the burden is on the plaintiff to show that an illegitimate factor * * * played a motivating or substantial role in the defendant’s employment decision * * * If the plaintiff presents sufficient evidence to support an inference of impermissible discrimination, the burden then shifts to the employer to show that the employment decision would have been reached in the absence of that impermissible motive” (Michaelis v State of New York, 258 AD2d 693, 694 , lv denied 93 NY2d 806 ; see, Tyler v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F2d 1176, 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kolanovic v. Gida
See Trump Taj Mahal Assoc. v. Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni, 761 F.Supp. 1143 (D.N.J.1991) (declining to adopt the tort of intentional spoliation prior to adoption by the New Jersey state courts.) [, aff'd 958 F.2d 365 (3d 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992) ]; PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police Dep’t, 832 F.Supp. 808 (D.N.J.1993) (noting that it is not entirely clear that New Jersey recognizes the tort of spoliation of evidence, but assuming it does, [it recognizes the tort] in the limited context of ruling on motion to amend to add a claim for sp…
cited
Cited "see"
Paramount Aviation v. Agusta
See Trump Taj Mahal Assoc. v. Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni Agusta, S.p.A., 761 F. Supp. 1143 (D.N.J. 1991), aff 'd mem., 958 F.2d 365 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paramount Aviation Corporation v. Gruppo Agusta Agusta Aerospace Corporation Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni, Augusta, S.P.A. Augusta, S.P.A
See Trump Taj Mahal Assoc. v. Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni Agusta, S.p.A, 761 F.Supp. 1143 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd mem., 958 F.2d 365 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Electric Co. v. Joiner
(2×)
See Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 959 F. 2d 1349, 1360 (CA6), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 826 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tanzini v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.
See Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1189 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992); Murphy v. American Home Products Corp., 136 A.D.2d 229 , 527 N.Y.S.2d 1, 4 (1st Dep’t 1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Pick v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
See Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 959 F.2d 1349, 1353, n. 1 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
See Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 959 F.2d 1349, 1360 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992) (finding no scientific basis for testimony of a causation expert who did “not testify on the basis of the collective view of his scientific discipline^ nor [did] he take issue with his peers and explain the grounds for his difference”); O’Conner v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 807 F.Supp. 1376, 1398 (D.Ill.1992), aff'd 13 F.3d 1090 (7th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2711 , 129 L.Ed.2d 838 (1994) (holding that “an expert opinion that …
cited
Cited "see"
Guillory v. Domtar Industries Inc.
See Prudhomme v. Tenneco Oil Co., 955 F.2d 390, 392-96 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 48 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Guillory v. Domtar Industries Inc.
See Prudhomme v. Tenneco Oil Co., 955 F.2d 390, 392-96 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 48 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Liberman v. Brady
See Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Patrick Perkins v. Brigham & Women's Hospital and George H. Kaye
See Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1182 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Perkins v. Brigham & Woman's
See Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1182 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 (1992). 8 analysis on our part supererogatory.
cited
Cited "see"
Perkins v. Brigham & Woman's
See Tyler ___ _____ v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1182 (2d Cir.), cert. _____________________ _____ denied, 506 U.S. 826 (1992). ______ 8 analysis on our part supererogatory.
cited
Cited "see"
Mary C. Quaratino v. Tiffany & Co., Michael Eiring, and David Wright
See Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1187 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jensen v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Where such testimony's factual basis, data, principles, methods, or their application are called sufficiently into question, the Court must determine whether the testimony has “a reliable basis in the knowledge and experience of [the relevant] discipline.” Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 149 (1999); see also Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 959 F.2d 1349, 1350 (6th Cir. 1992) (holding that scientific evidence that provided foundation for expert testimony, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, was not sufficient to allow a jury to find it more probable th…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stonehill College v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination
See also Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1181 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 959 F.2d 1349, 1360-61 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992) (“We do not mean to intimate that animal studies lack scientific merit or power when it comes to predicting outcomes in humans.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See, e.g., Pledger v. Featherlite Precast Corp., 308 Ark. 124 , 823 S.W.2d 852 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992). • The description of "illegal exaction" in this section includes a reference to "excessive" imposition, levying, assessment, or collection.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nakatomi Investments, Inc. v. City of Schenectady
See, e.g., Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1183 (2d Cir.) (“Despite the inarguable fact that only four justices in Price Waterhouse [v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 , 109 S.Ct. 1775 , 104 L.Ed.2d 268 (1989)] would have imposed a ‘direct evidence’ requirement for ‘mixed-motives’ cases, most circuits have engrafted this requirement into caselaw.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Padilla v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
See, e.g., Tyler v. Bethlehem, Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1189 (2d Cir.) (affirming front pay award for a period of 17 years in the total amount of $667,000), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
72 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1748, 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,403 Stephen M. Padilla and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
See, e.g., Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1189 (2d Cir.) (affirming front pay award for a period of 17 years in the total amount of $667,000), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diehl v. Xerox Corp.
See discussion infra; see also Tyler v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176, 1188-89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 82 , 121 L.Ed.2d 46 (1992) (soundness of methodology can go to weight, not admissibility, of expert opinion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grimes v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.
See also Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 959 F.2d 1349, 1360 (6th Cir.1992) (failure to indicate dose used in studies left analytical gap between evidence presented and inference to be drawn about whether therapeutic doses of medication caused the disease), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 , 113 S.Ct. 84 , 121 L.Ed.2d 47 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Featherlite Precast Corp.
v.
Pledger, Director, Department of Finance and Administration of Arkansas
v.
Pledger, Director, Department of Finance and Administration of Arkansas
No. 91-1974.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.